Kinds of designing and their functions in analyzing
In this paper, I mine the scholarly work of longtime MIT professor Donald Schön for a set of tactics which, having originated in his studies of the architectural design studio, are shown to be relevant to the architectural analysis of existing buildings. In this way, a specific and hitherto untapped potential of Schön’s work is developed, but more critically, I use the discussion to support a strategy of designerly analysis which suggests an expansion of studio pedagogy as a field for learning.
KeywordsSchon Pedagogy Architecture Studio
Student work in this paper was produced by Brett Barry and Lindsay Beukhof students in the M. Arch. degree program at North Dakota State University.
- Balfour, A. (Ed.). (1981). Architecture education study. New York: Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.Google Scholar
- Benedikt, M. (1991). Deconstructing the Kimbell: An essay on meaning and architecture. New York, NY: Sites Books.Google Scholar
- Borden, G. P. (2010). Material precedent: The typology of modern tectonics. Hoboken, NJ.: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice: A special report. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
- Christenson, M. (2007). Architectural knowledge and iterative mediating artifacts. In Flux: Design education in a changing world (Proceedings of the 5th international DEFSA Conference). Retrieved from http://www.defsa.org.za/papers/architectural-knowledge-and.
- Christenson, M. (2010). Digitally cultivating the accident in urban analysis. In E. M. Hemingway & A. Warren (Eds.), Architecture in the age of digital reproduction (Proceedings of the 2008 West Central ACSA conference). [CD-ROM] Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
- Christenson, M. (2011). Parametric variation revealing architectural untranslatability. In J. Cheon, S. Hardy, & T. Hemsath (Eds.), Parametricism (SPC): Proceedings of the 2011 ACADIA Regional Conference (pp. 267–273). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arch_facultyschol/21/.
- Christenson, M. (2012). Mixing algorithms in urban analysis and transformation. In Cities in transformation: Research and design (Proceedings of the EAAE/ARCC International Conference on Architectural Research) (pp. 578–581). Retrieved from http://www.arcc-arch.org/past-conferences/.
- Clark, R. H., & Pause, M. (1985). Precedents in architecture. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Corbusier, Le, Jeanneret, P., & Boesiger, W. (1946). OEuvre complète, 1938–1946. Erlenbach-Zurich: Éditions d’architecture.Google Scholar
- Cross, N. (2007a). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Eckert, C. M., Blackwell, A. F., Stacey, M. K., & Earl, C. F. (2004). Sketching across design domains. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Knight (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design III (pp. 79–101). Sydney: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.Google Scholar
- Eisenman, P. (2008). Ten canonical buildings: 1950–2000. New York, NY: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
- Gomez de Silva Garza, A., & Maher, M. L. (2001). Using evolutionary methods for design case adaptation. In W. Jabi (Ed.), Reinventing the discourse: How digital tools help bridge and transform research, education and practice in architecture (proceedings, 21st ACADIA conference) (pp. 180–191). Buffalo, NY: Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture.Google Scholar
- Graves, M. (1977). The necessity for drawing: Tangible speculation. Architectural Design, 47(6), 384–394.Google Scholar
- Herdeg, K. (1990a). Formal structure in Indian architecture. New York, NY: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
- Herdeg, K. (1990b). Formal structure in Islamic architecture of Iran and Turkistan. New York, NY: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1977a). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1977b). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459–482). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Lackney, J. A. (1999). A history of the studio-based learning model. Retrieved from http://edi.msstate.edu/work/pdf/history_studio_based_learning.pdf.
- Ordanova, I., Tidafi, T., & De Paoli, G. (2007). Is a digital model worth a thousand pictures? In A. A. Dong, A. E. Vande Moere, & J. S. Gero (Eds.), Computer-aided architectural design futures 2007: Proceedings of the 12th international CAAD futures conference (pp. 85–98). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Piotrowski, A. (2001). On the practices of representing and knowing architecture. In A. Piotrowski & J. Robinson (Eds.), The discipline of architecture (pp. 40–60). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1981). Learning a language, learning to design. In A. Balfour (Ed.), Architecture education study (pp. 339–471). New York: Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications Limited.Google Scholar
- Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Simmonds, R. P. (1978). Learning to learn and design: The development of effective strategies in a graduate school of architecture (Doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar