Educating ethical designers

Article

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on bringing sustainability into design education. The focus of such education, however, mainly concerns providing design students with the knowledge and skills needed to create sustainable design, which, so this paper argues, may not be enough. Thus, with a basis in Aristotelian virtue ethics, this paper shows that sustainable design education may apply a broader perspective by also focussing on how to stimulate design students’ desire to create sustainable solutions as well as providing them with the means to engage others in such ideas. As compared to the identified literature, the present paper represents a novel perspective on sustainability in design education that may constitute a basis for further discussions and educational developments.

Keywords

Design education Design ethics Sustainable design Design activism Socially responsible design 

References

  1. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, M., Edwards, S., & Massey, R. I. (2010). Toxic chemicals in toys and children’s products: Limitations of current responses and recommendations for government and industry. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(21), 7986–7991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman, D. B. (2009). Do good: How designers can change the world. Berkeley, CA: AIGA Design Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., & Tang, T. (2011). Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour. The Design Journal, 14(4), 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhamra, T., & Lofthouse, V. (2007). Design for sustainability: A practical approach. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. W. (2007). A review of compulsive buying disorder. World Psychiatry, 6(1), 14–18.Google Scholar
  7. Boks, C., & Diehl, J. C. (2006). Integration of sustainability in regular courses: Experiences in industrial design engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 932–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahoone, L. (2009). Hunting as a moral good. Environmental Values, 18(1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassim, F. (2013). Hands on, hearts on, minds on: Design thinking within an education context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, J. (2009). Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues, 24(4), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, J., & Gant, N. (2007). Design visionaries and other stories: A collection of sustainable design essays. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, J. (2013). Actions speak louder: Victor Papanek and the legacy of design activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cull, A. K. (2005). The education of undergraduate product designers in the principles and practice of sustainable design. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University.Google Scholar
  14. D’Anjou, P. (2010). Beyond duty and virtue in design ethics. Design Issues, 26(1), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreyfuss, H. (1955, reprinted 2012). Designing for people. New York: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
  16. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  17. Elliott, J. E., & Elliott, K. H. (2013). Tracking marine pollution. Science, 340(6132), 556–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ertekin, Z. O., & Atik, D. (2015). Sustainable markets: Motivating factors, barriers, and remedies for mobilization of slow fashion. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foulk, G. J. (1972). Plantinga’s criticisms of Sartre’s ethics. Ethics, 82(4), 330–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuad-Luke, A. (2007). Redefining the purpose of (sustainable) design: Enter the design enablers, catalysts in co-design. In J. Chapman & N. Gant (Eds.), Designers, visionaries and other stories (pp. 18–55). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  22. Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  23. Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grimm, H. (2012). Leaving the ivory tower or back into theory? Learning from paradigm cases in animal ethics. In T. Potthast & S. Meisch (Eds.), Climate change and sustainable development (pp. 441–446). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartelius, E. J. (2008). The rhetoric of expertise. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  26. IPCC. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change: Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jelsma, J., & Knot, M. (2002). Designing environmentally efficient services; A ‘script’ approach. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2(3), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Julier, G. (2013). From design culture to design activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kotler, P., & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lilley, D. (2009). Design for sustainable behaviour: Strategies and perceptions. Design Studies, 30(6), 704–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lofthouse, V. (2013). Social issues: Making them relevant and appropriate to undergraduate student designers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2), 8–23.Google Scholar
  34. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  35. Novotny, T. E., Lum, K., Smith, E., Wang, V., & Barnes, R. (2009). Communication cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(5), 1691–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Virtue ethics: A misleading category? The Journal of Ethics, 3(3), 163–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oak, A. (2000). It’s a nice idea, but it’s not actually real: Assessing the objects and activities of design. Journal of Art and Design Education, 19(1), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  39. Polak, P. (2007). Design for the other ninety percent. In C. E. Smith (Ed.), Design for the other ninety percent (pp. 19–25). New York: Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum.Google Scholar
  40. Ramirez, M. (2006). Sustainability in the education of industrial designers: The case for Australia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramirez, M. (2007). Sustainability integration in industrial design education: A worldwide survey. In C. Reidsema & R. Zehner (Eds.), Proceedings of ConnectED 2007: International conference on design education (pp. 1–5). Sidney: University of NSW.Google Scholar
  42. Ramirez, E. (2013). The consumer adoption of sustainability-oriented offerings: Toward a middle-range theory. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(4), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodríguez, E., & Boks, C. (2005). How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: The environmental implications. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing ecodesign 2005 (pp. 1–8). IEEE: Piscataway.Google Scholar
  44. Šálek, M., Svobodová, J., & Zasadil, P. (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landscape Ecology, 25(7), 1113–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2015). Global wealth report 2015. Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, C. R. (2004). Ethos dwells pervasively: A hermeneutic reading of Aristotle on credibility. In M. J. Hyde (Ed.), The ethos of rhetoric (pp. 1–19). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  48. Stegall, N. (2006). Designing for sustainability: A philosophy for ecologically intentional design. Design Issues, 22(2), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorpe, A. (2008). Design as activism: A conceptual tool. In C. Cipolla & P. P. Peruccio (Eds.), Proceedings of the changing the change conference (paper 127) (pp. 1–13). Turin: Allemandi Conference Press.Google Scholar
  50. Tillman, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  51. Tischner, U., & Charter, M. (2001). Sustainable product design. In M. Charter & U. Tischner (Eds.), Sustainable solutions: Developing products and services for the future (pp. 118–138). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Van Nes, N., & Cramer, J. (2005). Influencing product lifetime through product design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(5), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker, S. (2011). The spirit of design: objects, environment and meaning. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Webster, K., & Johnson, C. (2008). Sense & sustainability, educating for a circular economy. (n.p.): TerraPreta in association with Yorkshire Forward and InterfaceFLOR.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship ManagementUniversity of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark

Personalised recommendations