Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Educating ethical designers

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on bringing sustainability into design education. The focus of such education, however, mainly concerns providing design students with the knowledge and skills needed to create sustainable design, which, so this paper argues, may not be enough. Thus, with a basis in Aristotelian virtue ethics, this paper shows that sustainable design education may apply a broader perspective by also focussing on how to stimulate design students’ desire to create sustainable solutions as well as providing them with the means to engage others in such ideas. As compared to the identified literature, the present paper represents a novel perspective on sustainability in design education that may constitute a basis for further discussions and educational developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M., Edwards, S., & Massey, R. I. (2010). Toxic chemicals in toys and children’s products: Limitations of current responses and recommendations for government and industry. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(21), 7986–7991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D. B. (2009). Do good: How designers can change the world. Berkeley, CA: AIGA Design Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, T., Lilley, D., & Tang, T. (2011). Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour. The Design Journal, 14(4), 427–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, T., & Lofthouse, V. (2007). Design for sustainability: A practical approach. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. W. (2007). A review of compulsive buying disorder. World Psychiatry, 6(1), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boks, C., & Diehl, J. C. (2006). Integration of sustainability in regular courses: Experiences in industrial design engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 932–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoone, L. (2009). Hunting as a moral good. Environmental Values, 18(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassim, F. (2013). Hands on, hearts on, minds on: Design thinking within an education context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2009). Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues, 24(4), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J., & Gant, N. (2007). Design visionaries and other stories: A collection of sustainable design essays. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2013). Actions speak louder: Victor Papanek and the legacy of design activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, A. K. (2005). The education of undergraduate product designers in the principles and practice of sustainable design. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Anjou, P. (2010). Beyond duty and virtue in design ethics. Design Issues, 26(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfuss, H. (1955, reprinted 2012). Designing for people. New York: Allworth Press.

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. E., & Elliott, K. H. (2013). Tracking marine pollution. Science, 340(6132), 556–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertekin, Z. O., & Atik, D. (2015). Sustainable markets: Motivating factors, barriers, and remedies for mobilization of slow fashion. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulk, G. J. (1972). Plantinga’s criticisms of Sartre’s ethics. Ethics, 82(4), 330–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuad-Luke, A. (2007). Redefining the purpose of (sustainable) design: Enter the design enablers, catalysts in co-design. In J. Chapman & N. Gant (Eds.), Designers, visionaries and other stories (pp. 18–55). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design activism: Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, H. (2012). Leaving the ivory tower or back into theory? Learning from paradigm cases in animal ethics. In T. Potthast & S. Meisch (Eds.), Climate change and sustainable development (pp. 441–446). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartelius, E. J. (2008). The rhetoric of expertise. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014a). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014b). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change: Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelsma, J., & Knot, M. (2002). Designing environmentally efficient services; A ‘script’ approach. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2(3), 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julier, G. (2013). From design culture to design activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, D. (2009). Design for sustainable behaviour: Strategies and perceptions. Design Studies, 30(6), 704–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofthouse, V. (2013). Social issues: Making them relevant and appropriate to undergraduate student designers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2), 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, T. E., Lum, K., Smith, E., Wang, V., & Barnes, R. (2009). Communication cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(5), 1691–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Virtue ethics: A misleading category? The Journal of Ethics, 3(3), 163–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak, A. (2000). It’s a nice idea, but it’s not actually real: Assessing the objects and activities of design. Journal of Art and Design Education, 19(1), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, P. (2007). Design for the other ninety percent. In C. E. Smith (Ed.), Design for the other ninety percent (pp. 19–25). New York: Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M. (2006). Sustainability in the education of industrial designers: The case for Australia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M. (2007). Sustainability integration in industrial design education: A worldwide survey. In C. Reidsema & R. Zehner (Eds.), Proceedings of ConnectED 2007: International conference on design education (pp. 1–5). Sidney: University of NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, E. (2013). The consumer adoption of sustainability-oriented offerings: Toward a middle-range theory. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(4), 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, E., & Boks, C. (2005). How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: The environmental implications. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing ecodesign 2005 (pp. 1–8). IEEE: Piscataway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šálek, M., Svobodová, J., & Zasadil, P. (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landscape Ecology, 25(7), 1113–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A., Davies, J., & Lluberas, R. (2015). Global wealth report 2015. Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. R. (2004). Ethos dwells pervasively: A hermeneutic reading of Aristotle on credibility. In M. J. Hyde (Ed.), The ethos of rhetoric (pp. 1–19). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegall, N. (2006). Designing for sustainability: A philosophy for ecologically intentional design. Design Issues, 22(2), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, A. (2008). Design as activism: A conceptual tool. In C. Cipolla & P. P. Peruccio (Eds.), Proceedings of the changing the change conference (paper 127) (pp. 1–13). Turin: Allemandi Conference Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischner, U., & Charter, M. (2001). Sustainable product design. In M. Charter & U. Tischner (Eds.), Sustainable solutions: Developing products and services for the future (pp. 118–138). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nes, N., & Cramer, J. (2005). Influencing product lifetime through product design. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(5), 286–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2011). The spirit of design: objects, environment and meaning. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, K., & Johnson, C. (2008). Sense & sustainability, educating for a circular economy. (n.p.): TerraPreta in association with Yorkshire Forward and InterfaceFLOR.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management, University of Southern Denmark, Universitetsparken 1, 6000, Kolding, Denmark

    Anders Haug

Authors
  1. Anders Haug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Haug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haug, A. Educating ethical designers. Int J Technol Des Educ 27, 655–665 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9367-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9367-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation