Interdisciplinarity in design education: understanding the undergraduate student experience
- 423 Downloads
Interdisciplinarity is becoming a critical issue of concern for design schools across East Asia in their attempts to provide industry graduates with the skills and competences to make creative contributions in a global economy. As a result, East Asian higher education institutions are aggressively endeavouring to provide interdisciplinary undergraduate curriculum that combine traditional designerly skills with engineering knowledge and methods. The current study takes an interdisciplinary undergraduate course as case-study to examine how the pedagogic strategy of team teaching influences student learning experience. Two surveys of student learning were conducted for this research purpose. The first provided an indication of the holistic student learning experience, while the second explored the conditions of team and non-team teaching as influence upon learning experiences specifically. Results showed how students taught by a single instructor provided a more positive overall opinion of course quality and experienced significantly more encouragement to participate compared to team taught respondents. However, findings also indicated how team teaching significantly increased the students’ experience of a balanced contribution from different disciplinary perspectives and how the team teaching approach was significantly more effective in providing students with greater opportunities to understand the relevance of the different disciplines to the course subject. We conclude with a discussion of results in terms of the effective use of team teaching at undergraduate level as strategy for interdisciplinary learning experiences.
KeywordsInterdisciplinarity Student experience Team teaching Design thinking
We would like to extend our gratitude to all the students who took the time to respond to our call for participation and our institution in supporting opportunities for interdisciplinarity to prosper. This work was supported by the UNIST Creative and Innovative Project fund 1.150129.01.
- Affairs, Educational. (2013). UNIST 2013 course catalog. In UNIST (Ed.), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST).Google Scholar
- Carulli, M., Bordegoni, M., & Cugini, U. (2013). An intergrated framework to support design & engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 291–303.Google Scholar
- Jaeger, A., Mayrhofer, W., Kuhlang, P., & Matyas, K. (2013). Total immersion: Hands and heads-on training in a learning factory for comprehensive industrial engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
- Kang, N. (2008). Activation plan for the convergence study of scientific technology & humanities and social sciences. Ministry of education, science and technology.Google Scholar
- Kim, K., Kim, N., Jung, S., Kim, D. Y., Kwak, Y., & Kyung, G. (2012). A radically assembled design-engineering education program with a selection and combination of multiple disciplines. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(4), 904–919.Google Scholar
- Klein, J., & Newell, W. (1998). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In W. Newell (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. (2014). The structure of knowledge experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed., pp. 153–192). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Lattuca, L. (2001a). Considering interdisciplinarity creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among College and University faculty. New York: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
- Lattuca, L. R. (2001b). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and University faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
- Lattuca, L, & Knight, D. (2010). AC 2010-1537: In the eye of the beholder: Defining and studying interdisciplinarity in engineering education.Google Scholar
- Lattuca, L., Knight, D., & Bergom, I. (2013). Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 726–739.Google Scholar
- Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (2003). Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration of “symptoms of quality”. In G. Origgi & C. Heintz (Eds.), Rethinking interdisciplinarity. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Mok, Y. H. (2009). Korea education in the age of knowledge convergence. Paper presented at the autumn conference of Korean educational research association.Google Scholar
- Newell, W. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. (2010) Why Design Education Must Change. Core77, Retrieved from http://www.core77.com/posts/17993/why-design-education-must-change-17993
- Norman, D, & Klemmer, S. (2014). State of design: How design education must change. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140325102438-12181762-state-of-design-how-design-educationmust-change.
- Oehlberg, L., Leighton, I., & Agogino, A. (2012). Teaching human-centred design innovation across engineering, humanities and social sciences. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 484–491.Google Scholar
- Repko, A. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (2nd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Strong, D. (2012). An approach for improving design and innovation skills in engineering education: The multidisciplinary design stream. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 339–348.Google Scholar
- Suh, S. G., & Park, S., J. (2009). The Korean Government’s Policies and Strategies to Foster World-Class Universities. In Cheng, Y., Wang, Q. & Nian, C., L. (Eds.), How World-Class Universities Affect Global Higher Education. (pp. 65–83). Rotterdam: SensePublishes.Google Scholar
- The Korean Ministy of Education, Science and Technology. (2008). World Class University Project.Google Scholar
- Thompson, M. (2009). Increasing the rigor of freshman design education. Paper presented at the iasdr09, Seoul. http://www.iasdr2009.or.kr/index.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Thompson, M. K. (2009). ED100: Shifting paradigms in design education and student thinking at KAIST. Paper presented at the CIRP design conference 2009.Google Scholar
- Tolbert, D., & Daly, R. (2013). First-year engineering student perceptions of creative opportunities in design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 879–890.Google Scholar
- Yim, H, Lee, K, Brezing, A, Lower, M, & Feldhusen, J. (2011). Learning from an interdisciplinary and intercultural project-based design course. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering and product design education, City University, London, UK.Google Scholar