Deconstructing the Tower of Babel: a design method to improve empathy and teamwork competences of informatics students
- 480 Downloads
The competence-based education recently launched in Spanish universities presents a set of abilities and skills that are difficult to teach to students in higher and more technologically-oriented grades. In this paper, a teaching intervention that is based on design methodologies is proposed, to upgrade the competitive capacities of computer engineering students. In particular, this intervention targets those aspects relating to working in multidisciplinary teams and to defining requirements based on the user’s empathy and knowledge. The main idea inspiring this technique is that the underlying challenge is a communication problem. As Brooks (1995) states in his book The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, even a project having all of the prerequisites for success (a clear mission, manpower, materials, time and adequate technology) could fail as a Tower of Babel. The proposed technique through mixed methods has been evaluated with students enrolled in different courses, confirming the repeatability and validity of this method from quantitative measurement, from observation of the results, and from ascertaining the value perceived by students and their attitudes.
KeywordsDesign Creative thinking User empathy Requirements definition Teamwork Interdisciplinary Shared understanding Human computer interaction Collaborative learning
This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Government (Project TIN2012-37826-C02-01).
- Aoyama, M. (2005). Persona-and-scenario based requirements engineering for software embedded in digital consumer products. In Requirements engineering, proceedings. 13th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering (pp. 85–94). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Batchelor, R., & Bobrowicz, A. (2014). Empathic and ethical design of technology. In C. Stephanidis & M. Antona (Eds.), Universal access in human–computer interaction: Design and development methods for universal access (pp. 3–10). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Blanco, E., Pourroy, F., & Arikoglu, S. (2014). Role of personas and scenarios in creating shared understanding of functional requirements: An empirical study. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition’12 (pp. 61–78). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bologna Declaration. (1999). The European higher education area. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education, 19. Retrieved from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/MDC/BOLOGNA_DECLARATION1.pdf.
- Brooks, F. P, Jr. (1995). The mythical man-month, anniversary edition: Essays on software engineering. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Chappell, C., Gonczi, A., & Hager, P. (1995). Competency-based education. In G. Foley (Ed.), Understanding adult education and training (pp. 175–187). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. (1997). Convention on the recognition of qualifications concerning higher education in the European Region. Lisbon, 11.IV.1997. Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/165.htm.
- Curricula, C. (2001). Computer Science, Final Report, The joint task force on computing curricula. In IEEE computer society and association for computing machinery, IEEE computer society. Retrieved from http://www.acm.org/education/education/education/curric_vols/cc2001.pdf.
- Da Silva, T. S., Martin, A., Maurer, F., & Silveira, M. S. (2011). User-centered design and agile methods: A systematic review. In AGILE Conference (pp. 77–86). doi: 10.1109/AGILE.2011.24.
- Faily, S., & Fléchais, I. (2010). Barry is not the weakest link: Eliciting secure system requirements with personas. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (pp. 124–132). British Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Fowler, T. C. (1990). Value analysis in design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Fruchter, R. (2001). Dimensions of teamwork education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4/5), 426–430.Google Scholar
- Granollers, T., Oliva, M., García, R., & Gil, R. (2008). Project-based learning applied to a master in HCI. Magazine of Interaction Design & Architecture, 3, 59–66.Google Scholar
- Guðjónsdóttir, R. & Lindquist, S. (2008). Personas and scenarios: Design tool or a communication device? In Proceedings of COOP’, Carry Le Rouet, France, (pp. 165–176).Google Scholar
- López, J. M., Manchado, E., Casas, R., López-Forniés, I., & Blanco-Bascuas, T. (2013). Professional competences acquisition through interdisciplinary projects. In M. P. Sánchez & M. L. Sein-Echaluce (Eds.), II international conference on learning, innovation and competitiveness-CINAIC (pp. 385–390). Madrid: Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.Google Scholar
- Matthews, T., Judge, T., & Whittaker, S. (2012). How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1219–1228). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Miller, G., & Williams, L. (2006). Personas: moving beyond role-based requirements engineering. Technical Reports (TR-2006-24). North Carolina: Microsoft and North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
- Newman, D. (2015). The process of design squiggle central office of design. Retrieved from http://v2.centralstory.com/about/squiggle/.
- Nielsen, L. (2004). Engaging Personas and Narrative Scenarios, Vol. 17, PhD Series. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, L. (2007). How can Personas be useful for developers? Retrieved from http://personas.dk/?p=45.
- Nielsen, L. Personas. (2013). In M. Soegaard & R. F. Dam (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (2nd ed.). Aarhus: The Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
- Openideo (2011). 7 tips on better brainstorming. Retrieved from https://openideo.com/blog/seven-tips-on-better-brainstorming.
- Platt, D. S. (2007). Why software sucks–and what you can do about it. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
- Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: practice and theory. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences (pp. 1–15). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Randolph, G. (2004). Use-cases and personas: a case study in light-weight user interaction design for small development projects. Informing Science: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 7, 105–116.Google Scholar
- Sorbonne Joint Declaration (1998). Joint declaration on harmonisation of the architecture of the European higher education system. Paris, the Sorbonne. Retrieved from http://www.eees.es/pdf/Sorbona_EN.pdf.
- Tulsi, P. K., & Poonia, M. P. (2015). Expectations of industry from technical graduates: Implications for curriculum and instructional processes. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special Issue, 19–24. doi: 10.16920/ijerit/2015/v0i0/59339.
- Tuning Project (n.d.), Tuning methodology. In Tuning educational structures in europe. Retrieved from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/tuning-methodology.html#outcomes.
- Wikipedia (2015). European credit transfer and accumulation system. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Credit_Transfer_and_Accumulation_System.
- Wilhelm, W. J., Logan, J., Smith, S. M., & Szul, L. F. (2002). Meeting the demand: Teaching “Soft” skills. Information analyses (070). Little Rock, Arkansas: Delta Pi Epsilon Publishers.Google Scholar
- Unizar (n.d). Official bachelor website from the University of Zaragoza. Retrieved from http://titulaciones.unizar.es/ing-informatica.