Social network-based engineering education (SNEE) is designed and implemented as a model of Education 3.0 paradigm. SNEE represents a new learning methodology, which is based on the concept of social networks and represents an extended model of project-led education. The concept of social networks was applied in the real-life experiment, considering two different dimensions: (1) to organize the education process as a social network-based process; and (2) to analyze the students’ interactions in the context of evaluation of the students learning performance. The objective of this paper is to present a new model for students evaluation based on their behavior during the course and its validation in comparison with the traditional model of students’ evaluation. The validation of the new evaluation model is made through an analysis of the correlation between social network analysis measures (degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and average tie strength) and the grades obtained by students (grades for quality of work, grades for volume of work, grades for diversity of work, and final grades) in a social network-based engineering education. The main finding is that the obtained correlation results can be used to make the process of the students’ performance evaluation based on students interactions (behavior) analysis, to make the evaluation partially automatic, increasing the objectivity and productivity of teachers and allowing a more scalable process of evaluation. The results also contribute to the behavioural theory of learning performance evaluation. More specific findings related to the correlation analysis are: (1) the more different interactions a student had (degree centrality) and the more frequently the student was between the interaction paths of other students (betweenness centrality), the better was the quality of the work; (2) all five social network measures had a positive and strong correlation with the grade for volume of work and with the final grades; and (3) a student with high average tie strength had a higher grade for diversity of work than those with low ties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594–607.
Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403–412.
Ai, J., Zhao, H., Carley, K., Su, Z., & Li, H. (2013). Neighbor vector centrality of complex networks based on neighbors degree distribution. The European Physical Journal B, 86(4), 1–7.
Bales, R. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. New York: Perseus Books.
Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564.
Borgatti, S. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. Connections, 18(1), 112–114.
Borgatti, S. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12(1), 21–34.
Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis (version 6). Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S., & Halgin, D. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.
Borgatti, S., & Li, X. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 5–22.
Cimenler, O., Reeves, K., & Skvoretz, J. (2014). A regression analysis of researchers’ social network metrics on their citation performance in a college of engineering. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 667–682.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daly, A., Moolenaar, N., Bolivar, J., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359–391.
Dewick, P., & Miozzo, M. (2004). Networks and innovation: Sustainable technologies in Scottish social housing. R&D Management, 34(3), 323–333.
Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., & Chilko, D. (2011). Statistics for research. New Jersey: Wiley.
Fernandes, S., Flores, M., & Lima, R. (2007). Project-led education in Engineering: Monitoring and assessing the learning process. In Joining forces in engineering education towards excellence—Proceedings of the SEFI and IGIP joint annual conference 2007. Miskolc, Hungary.
Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Flores, M., & Lima, R. (2014). Engaging students in learning: Findings from a study of project-led education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 55–67.
Fidalgo, P. (2012). Learning networks and moodle use in online courses: a social network analysis study. Doctoral thesis, New University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Fitzpatrick, B., & Lueck, J. (2010). The case against data lock-in. Queue, 8(10), 20.
Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
Giger, E., Pinzger, M., & Gall, H. (2012). Can we predict types of code changes? An empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Working conference on mining software repositories (MSR). Zurich, Switzerland.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. California: Riverside.
Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.
Hassan, I., Talib, N., Riaz, A., & Iqbal, M. (2014). Influence of national and engineering culture on team role selection. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 91–105.
Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87–93.
Hawe, P., Webster, C., & Shiell, A. (2004). A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(12), 971–975.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education—Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287–314.
Hong, J., Hwang, M., Wong, W., Lin, H., & Yau, C. (2012). Gender differences in social cognitive learning at a technological project design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(4), 451–472.
Jippes, E., Achterkamp, M., Brand, P., Kiewiet, D., Pols, J., & van Engelen, J. (2010). Disseminating educational innovations in health care practice: Training versus social networks. Social Science and Medicine, 70(10), 1509–1517.
Keats, D., & Schmidt, J. P. (2007). The genesis and emergence of Education 3.0 in higher education and its potential for Africa. First Monday, 12(3). doi:10.5210/fm.v12i3.1625.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87–103.
Lengel, J. G. (2013). Education 3.0: Seven steps to better schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Levin, D., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.
Liccardi, I., Ounnas, A., Pau, R., Massey, E., Kinnunen, P., Lewthwaite, S., et al. (2007). The role of social networks in students’ learning experiences. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(4), 224–237.
Lima, R., Carvalho, D., Assunção Flores, M., & Van Hattum-Janssen, N. (2007). A case study on project led education in engineering: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 337–347.
Lomi, A., Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Torló, V. (2011). Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1506–1520.
Martınez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers and Education, 41(4), 353–368.
Obreiter, P., & Gräf, G. (2002). Towards scalability in tuple spaces. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on applied computing. Madrid, Spain.
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill International.
Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2000). Patterns of interaction in computer supported learning: A social network analysis. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the learning sciences. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Powell, P. (2004). Assessment of team-based projects in project-led education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 221–230.
Powell, P., & Weenk, W. (2003). Project-led engineering education. Utrecht: Lemma.
Putnik, G., Costa, E., Alves, C., Manupati, V., & Castro, H. (2013). Social network analysis for social network-based projects in project-led education: A case study from an engineering course. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on virtual and networked organizations emergent technologies and tools (ViNOrg). Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal.
Rienties, B., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Understanding (in) formal learning in an academic development programme: A social network perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 123–135.
Russo, T., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254–261.
Tseng, K., Chang, C., Lou, S., & Chen, W. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102.
Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2013). Transfer of training: Adding insight through social network analysis. Educational Research Review, 8, 37–47.
van Hattum-Janssen, N., & Vasconcelos, R. (2008). The tutor in project-led education: Evaluation of tutor performance. In Proceedings of the 36th annual SEFI conference. Aalborg, Denmark.
Vercellone-Smith, P., Jablokow, K., & Friedel, C. (2012). Characterizing communication networks in a web based classroom: Cognitive styles and linguistic behavior of self-organizing groups in online discussions. Computers and Education, 59(2), 222–235.
Vrabič, R., Husejnagić, D., & Butala, P. (2012). Discovering autonomous structures within complex networks of work systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 61(1), 423–426.
Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. (1988). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, T. (2014). Using smart mobile devices in social-network-based health education practice: A learning behavior analysis. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 958–963.
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, through the Grants “Projeto Estratégico—UI 252—2011–2012” reference PEst-OE/EME/UI0252/2011, “Ph.D. Scholarship Grant” reference SFRH/BD/85672/2012, and the support of Parallel Planes Lda.
About this article
Cite this article
Putnik, G., Costa, E., Alves, C. et al. Analysing the correlation between social network analysis measures and performance of students in social network-based engineering education. Int J Technol Des Educ 26, 413–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9318-z
- Social network-based engineering education
- Education 3.0
- Project-led education
- Social networks
- Social network analysis
- Students’ grades