The mediator effects of imagination between learning environment and academic performance: a comparison between science and engineering majors
- 408 Downloads
The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the mediator effects of imagination between learning environment and academic performance, and (2) to compare differences between the environment–imagination–performance structural models of science and engineering majors. A survey was administered at eight universities across different regions of Taiwan. The participants in this study were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 529 science majors, whereas the second group consisted of 523 engineering majors. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the structure of the measures employed in this study. A structural equation modeling was used to test all the hypotheses proposed. With respect to the science group, our results showed that, through the mediation of imagination, learning resources had a dominant impact on academic performance, whereas both human aggregate and organizational measure had moderate influences. In contrast, among the engineering group, both human aggregate and social climate had relatively strong effects on academic performance, whereas both learning resources and organizational measure had mild influence. These findings seem promising enough to warrant further inquiry. They also provide insights for fields in which imaginative talent and creative performance are essential. Finally, practical applications of the present study were suggested, limitations were acknowledged, and future research was discussed.
KeywordsAcademic performance Engineering education Imagination Learning environment Science education
The current study is part of the research Project (NSC102-2511-S-002-009-MY2) supported by Taiwan’s National Science Council. The authors would like to acknowledge Wei-Sheng Lin for his valuable contributions in statistical analysis. The authors would also like to extend their gratitude to the insightful suggestions of anonymous International Journal of Technology and Design Education reviewers.
- Association, American. College. Personnel. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.Google Scholar
- Beaney, M. (2005). Imagination and creativity. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
- Büscher, M., Eriksen, M. A., & Kristensen, J. F. (2004). Ways of grounding imagination. Retrieved December 26, 2012, from http://www.daimi.au.dk/Workspace/site/content/heading_07/papers/PDC2004.pdf.
- Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms: Understanding “A framework for K-12 science education”. Science Scope, 35(4), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, P., & Noone, L. (2006). Critical imagination: A pedagogy for engaging pre-service teachers in the university classroom. College Quarterly, 9(4). Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.senecac.on.ca/quarterly/2006-vol09-num04-fall/cartwright_noone.html. Accessed December 15, 2012.
- Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–335). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chen, S.-C., Huang, Y., & Liang, C. (2012). The combined effects of learning environment and personality traits on student imagination. Instructional Technology and Media, 102, 62–78.Google Scholar
- Chen, S.-F., Lin, C.-Y., Wang, J.-R., Lin, S.-W., & Kao, H.-L. (2013). A Cross-grade comparison to examine the context effect on the relationships among family resources, school climate, learning participation, science attitude, and science achievement based on TIMSS 2003 in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2089–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Esolen, A. (2010). Ten ways to destroy the imagination of your child. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.Google Scholar
- Folkmann, M. N. (2010, November 29-December 1). Enabling creativity. Imagination in design processes. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity ICDC 2010, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Holton, G. (1998). Scientific imagination: With a new introduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lawson, A. E. (2010). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94(2), 336–364.Google Scholar
- Liang, C., Chen, S.-C., & Huang, Y. (2012a). Awaken imagination: Effects of learning environment and individual psychology. Journal of Information Communication, 3(1), 93–115.Google Scholar
- Liu, E., & Noppe-Brandon, S. (2009). Imagination first: Unlocking the power of possibilities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- National Society of Professional Engineers. (2006). Frequently asked questions about engineering. Retrieved 2011-01-30, http://www.nspe.org/Media/Resources/faqs.html.
- Peterson, M. W., & Spencer, M. G. (1990). Understanding academic cultures and climate. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures (pp. 3–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Petroski, H. (2010). Engineers and scientists: Similarities and differences. The Bent of tau Beta Pi, C1(3), 22–26.Google Scholar
- Poser, H. (1998). On structural differences between science and engineering. Philosophy and Technology, 4(2), 81–92.Google Scholar
- Stone, M. (2010). Imagination in science. Yale Scientific Magazine, 83.3, Access December 25, 2012: http://www.yalescientific.org/2010/10/from-the-editor-imagination-in-science/.
- Strange, C. C. (2003). Dynamics of campus environments. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard Jr (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (4th ed., pp. 297–316). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus learning environments that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Swirski, T. (2010). Unleashing the imagination in learning, teaching and assessment: Design perspectives, innovative practices and meaning making. Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference. Australia: Australian Technology Network.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Mail/xmcamail.2008_03.dir/att-0189/Vygotsky__Imag___Creat_in_Childhood.pdf.