Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering design module

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineering education focuses chiefly on students’ ability to solve problems. While most engineering students are proficient in solving paper questions, they may not be proficient at providing optimal solutions to pragmatic project-based problems that require systematic learning strategy, innovation, problem-solving, and execution. The present study aims to determine whether an enhanced Project-based learning (PBL) with appropriate innovative interventions leads to increased students’ ability to achieve better learning and project outcomes. The interventions refer to incorporating added learning and facilitating methods, namely, (1) use of mind-maps; (2) employment of analogies; and (3) use of round-table discussions. The study was conducted with a total number of 60 first-time PBL students equally divided into two classes with one serving as an experimental class and another as a control class. In addition, one class of students had a lower academic standing compared to the other (control). The rubric for the project-based module included a written knowledge test and a scenario-based oral examination to test knowledge and problem-solving skills, a artefact demonstration to evaluate artefact’s performance. A major finding of this study was that there were significant differences in knowledge scores, problem-solving ability and artefact performance between students undergoing conventional and enhanced PBL methods. It could also be inferred from this study that students who had undergone enhanced PBL method designed better systems and had better performing artefacts than those who were subjected to the conventional PBL approach. Finally, it was concluded that incorporating enhanced learning and facilitating methods to group-centric, project-based driven education provided a more fertile environment to promote better learning experience and improved problem-solving ability which could eventually lead to developing innovative and pragmatic solutions to real-world engineering problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., De Simone, C., d’Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto, Ontario: Harcourt-Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azer, S. A. (2009). Interactions between students and tutor in problem-based learning: The significance of deep learning. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Science, 25(5), 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budda, J. W. (2004). Mind-maps as classroom exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnowsky, P., Brown, H., Szajnman, A., & Realph, A. (2006). Developing knowledge landscapes through project-based learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(2), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, K. K., Lee, C. I., & Lu, P. C. (2009). A study of the effect of pupils’ learning achievement on project-based learning with context awareness technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 226, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danford, G. L. (2006). Project-based learning and international business education. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 18(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.

  • Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruchter, R. (2001). Dimensions of teamwork education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4–5), 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, I. S. (2003). From solo-run to mainstream thinking: Project-based learning in engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, G., Chelvier, R., Knoll, S. W., & Görs, J. (2011). Idea engineering: A case study of a practically oriented university course in innovation. System Sciences (HICSS), In: Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 4–7 Jan. 2011, pp 1–7.

  • Howard, J. (2002). Technology-enhanced project-based learning in teacher education: Addressing the goals of transfer. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. A. (1999). Project-based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, T. (1992). A procedure for stepwise regression analysis. Statistical Papers, 33(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centered active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louise, J. T. (2003). Instructor expectations in a project-based undergraduate mechanical engineering classroom. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project-based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused Project-based learning for middle and high school teachers. Buck Inst for Education; 2nd Rev Spl edition.

  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. E., & Treagus, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—is problem based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 11, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathans, L. L., Oswald, F. L., & Nimon, K. (2012). Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(9), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ríos, I., Cazorla, A., Díaz-Puente, J. M., & Yagüe, J. L. (2010). Project–based learning in engineering higher education: two decades of teaching competences in real environments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1368–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W., & Stronkhorst, H. (1984). Causal modelling in nonexperimental research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1974). Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 44(3), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socha, T. J., & Socha, D. M. (1994). Children’s task-group communication. In: L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol, Mohsen, & Dennick, Reg. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. PhD Thesis. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

  • Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasemin, G., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing project-based learning and e-portfolio assessment in an undergraduate course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasin, R., Mustapha, R., & Zaharim, A. (2009) Promoting creativity through problem oriented project based learning in engineering education at Malaysian polytechnics: Issues and challenges. In Proceedings of 8th WSEAS international conference on education and educational technology (EDU’09) p. 253.

  • Yasin, M. R., & Rahman, S. (2011). Problem oriented project based learning (POPBL) in promoting education for sustainable development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into problem and project-based learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore

    K. J. Chua & W. M. Yang

  2. Department of Bio-Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117576, Singapore

    H. L. Leo

Authors
  1. K. J. Chua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. M. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. L. Leo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. Chua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chua, K.J., Yang, W.M. & Leo, H.L. Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering design module. Int J Technol Des Educ 24, 437–458 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9255-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9255-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation