Abstract
This case study examined team-based computer-game design efforts by children with diverse abilities to explore the nature of their collective design actions and cognitive processes. Ten teams of middle-school children, with a high percentage of minority students, participated in a 6-weeks, computer-assisted math-game-design program. Essential processes of collective design cognition and operation emerged from the data: (a) collective exploration of design constraints during problem framing, (b) aggregation of identity, experience, and memory for collective solution generation, and (c) development of coalition and task interdependence during design execution. Salient contexts supporting collective design included team-role fulfillment with presence of leadership and scaffolding for mutuality in design talk. The study findings also indicated perceived learning of school children during collaborative math-game design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Participants’ names in this paper are pseudonyms.
References
Barron, B. (2009). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.
Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2011). An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 765–782.
Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50, 25–56.
Bosch, M., Faber, M. J., Cruijsberg, J., Voerman, G. E., Leatherman, S., Grol, R. P., et al. (2009). Review article: Effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination a literature review. Medical Care Research and Review, 66(6), 5S–35S.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 85–92.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). Design problem solving: A task analysis (pp. 59–71). Winter issue: AI Magazine.
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
Doise, W., & Mugny, W. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568.
Gibbs, R. W, Jr, & Mueller, R. A. G. (1990). Conversation as coordinated, cooperative interaction. In S. P. Robertson, W. Z. Zachary, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Cognition, computing, and cooperation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gibson, C. B. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 121–134.
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: The via kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2), 158–174.
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.
Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Burke, W. Q. (2010). Entering the clubhouse: Case studies of young programmers joining the online Scratch communities. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 22(2), 21–35.
Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2011). Design expert’s participation in elementary students’ collaborative design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9172-6.
Keller, C., & Keller, J. (1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kolodner, J.L., Camp, P.J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1532–7809, 12(4), 495–547.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Liu, Y.-T. (1996). Is designing one search or two? A model of design thinking involving symbolism and connectionism. Design Studies, 17, 435–449.
Marshall, M., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publication.
Nagai, Y., & Noguchi, H. (2003). An experimental study on the design thinking process started from difficult keywords: Modeling the thinking process of creative design. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(4), 429–437.
Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16–27.
Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007). From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 149–166.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2000). Visualization and sketching in design process. The Design Journal, 3(1), 3–14.
Shaffer, D.W. (2005). Studio mathematics: The epistemology and practice of design pedagogy as a model for mathematics learning. Wisconsin Center for Education Research Working paper, No. 2005-3.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–204.
Sotamaa, O. (2005). Creative user-centered design practices: Lessons from game cultures. In L. Haddon (Ed.), Innovatory users and communication technologies (pp. 105–116). New York, NY: Springer.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaube, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams—an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23, 473–496.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.
West, G. P. (2007). Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 77–102.
Wetzstein, A., & Hacker, W. (2004). Reflective verbalization improves solutions. The effects of question-based reflection in design problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 145–156.
Wielinga, B. J., & Schreiber, A. T. (1997). Configuration design problem solving. IEEE Expert/Intelligent Systems and Their Application, 12(2), 49–56.
Yin, R.K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ke, F., Im, T. A case study on collective cognition and operation in team-based computer game design by middle-school children. Int J Technol Des Educ 24, 187–201 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9248-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9248-6