Abstract
The goal of this research was to determine the long-term impact that selected instructional interventions, based on research in metacognition and learning theory, have on students’ creativity. The study builds off research that has been conducted documenting the impact of creative thinking based instructional interventions. The study tracked design students beginning their freshman year to determine if observed improvements have been maintained throughout 4 years of undergraduate study. Preliminary research statistically tested the introduction of structured metacognitive skills on the development of creative thinking ability for a diverse population of undergraduate design students. This research indicated that an approach to education influenced by research in learning theory and metacognition does, in the short-term, result in students who are more creative. By continuing testing throughout students’ education an equally important question was answered. To what degree do students maintain or improve this level of enhanced creative thinking ability over an extended period of time? The findings showed that students who participated in one or both interventions finished with significantly higher levels of creative thinking. The knowledge gained also demonstrated how newly structured educational interventions utilizing online blogs and other Internet based technologies were successful in enhancing and maintaining students’ creative thinking abilities. The goal was to provide educators with insight and guidance in the application of a metacognitive approach and to introduce available technologies to aid in this process. This study provides educators with a plan of action consisting of a toolbox of creative strategies and a framework for a reflective approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. (2001). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Anderson, N. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Brigham: CAL Digest, April. Brigham Young University.
Anthony, K. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studios. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Armbruster, B. (1989). Metacognition in creativity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 172–182). New York: Plenum Press.
Atman, C. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: An in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325–357.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(12), 3–38.
Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 381–401.
Barell, J. (1985). You ask the wrong questions! Educational Leadership, 42(8), 18–23.
Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 205–223.
Boyer, E., & Mitgang, L. (1996). Building community: A new future for architectural education and practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Riser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research Foundations. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1078–1089.
Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 319–337). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, R. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–32). New York: Plenum Press.
Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of the design ability. Design Studies, 11(3), 127–140.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternburg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in education theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davies, A., & Reid, A. (2000). Uncovering problematics in design education – learning and the design entity. Proceedings of international conference re-inventing design education in the university (pp. 178–184). http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/620/. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.
Davies, G. A., Houtman, S. E., Warren, T. F., Roweton, W. E., Mari, S., & Belcher, T. L. (1972). A program for training creative thinking: Inner city evaluation (Rep. No. 224). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
Davies, M., Peter, H., Bernard, M., & Gertrude, S. (1997). Design as a catalyst for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
De Bono, E. (1973). Lateral thinking. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity—Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, 8(2), 96–100.
Doerner, D. (1974). Die kognitive Organisation beim Problemloesen. Bern: Huber.
Eastman, C., McCracken, M., & Newstetter, W. (2001). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Ehmann, D. (2004). Futuregraduate: The role of assessment within design education. Futureground. Monash University, VIC.
Feldhusen, J. H. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills a personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255–268.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: New area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Flavell, J. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: Something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. In J. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development (pp. 272–287). New York City: Cambridge University Press.
Gordon, W. J. (1976). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Collier Books.
Hargrove, R. (2008). Creating creativity in the design studio: Assessing the impact of metacognitive skill development on creative abilities. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York: Plenum.
Huitt, W. (1997). Metacognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved February, 2006, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/metacogn.html.
Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem solving. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.
King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317.
Koch, A., Schwennsen, D., Thomas, A., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2002). The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architecture Students.
Kvan, T. (2001). The problem in studio teaching—revisiting the pedagogy of studio teaching. 1st ACAE conference on architectural education (pp. 95–105). In T. Milton (Ed.), Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture: National University of Singapore.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford UK: Architectural Press.
Lyle, J. T. (1985). Design for human ecosystems. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Mansfield, R. S., Busse, T. V., & Krepelka, E. J. (1978). The effectiveness of creative training. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 517–536.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 87–101). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.
Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.
Parnes, S. J. (1981). The magic of your mind. Buffulo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
Pesut, D. J. (1990). Creative thinking as a self-regulatory metacognitive process—A model for education, training and research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 105–110.
Salama, A. (2005). New trends in architectural education: Designing the design studio. North Carolina, USA: Tailored text and unlimited potential publishing. Raleigh.
Salama, A. (2008). A theory for integrating knowledge in architectural design education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 100–128.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). Child as a co-investigator: Helping children gain insight into their own mental processes. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 66–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Ealbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329–363.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Temple-Smith.
Schraw, G. (1998). On the development of adult metacognition. In C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning, development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 89–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schraw, G., & Brooks, D. (1999). Helping students self-regulate in math and science courses: Improving the will and the skill. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–373.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-fact model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Taylor, C. W. (1987). A high-tech high-touch concept of creativity—With its complexity made simple for wide adaptability. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers on creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 131–155). Buffulo, NY: Bearly.
The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (2000). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America. Washington D.C.: Department of Labor.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hargrove, R.A. Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 489–517 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6