Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this research was to determine the long-term impact that selected instructional interventions, based on research in metacognition and learning theory, have on students’ creativity. The study builds off research that has been conducted documenting the impact of creative thinking based instructional interventions. The study tracked design students beginning their freshman year to determine if observed improvements have been maintained throughout 4 years of undergraduate study. Preliminary research statistically tested the introduction of structured metacognitive skills on the development of creative thinking ability for a diverse population of undergraduate design students. This research indicated that an approach to education influenced by research in learning theory and metacognition does, in the short-term, result in students who are more creative. By continuing testing throughout students’ education an equally important question was answered. To what degree do students maintain or improve this level of enhanced creative thinking ability over an extended period of time? The findings showed that students who participated in one or both interventions finished with significantly higher levels of creative thinking. The knowledge gained also demonstrated how newly structured educational interventions utilizing online blogs and other Internet based technologies were successful in enhancing and maintaining students’ creative thinking abilities. The goal was to provide educators with insight and guidance in the application of a metacognitive approach and to introduce available technologies to aid in this process. This study provides educators with a plan of action consisting of a toolbox of creative strategies and a framework for a reflective approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (2001). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Brigham: CAL Digest, April. Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, K. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studios. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, B. (1989). Metacognition in creativity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 172–182). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atman, C. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: An in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(12), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barell, J. (1985). You ask the wrong questions! Educational Leadership, 42(8), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E., & Mitgang, L. (1996). Building community: A new future for architectural education and practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Riser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research Foundations. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1078–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 319–337). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–32). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of the design ability. Design Studies, 11(3), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E., & Sternburg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in education theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., & Reid, A. (2000). Uncovering problematics in design education – learning and the design entity. Proceedings of international conference re-inventing design education in the university (pp. 178–184). http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/620/. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.

  • Davies, G. A., Houtman, S. E., Warren, T. F., Roweton, W. E., Mari, S., & Belcher, T. L. (1972). A program for training creative thinking: Inner city evaluation (Rep. No. 224). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.

  • Davies, M., Peter, H., Bernard, M., & Gertrude, S. (1997). Design as a catalyst for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1973). Lateral thinking. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity—Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York, NY: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, 8(2), 96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, D. (1974). Die kognitive Organisation beim Problemloesen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C., McCracken, M., & Newstetter, W. (2001). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehmann, D. (2004). Futuregraduate: The role of assessment within design education. Futureground. Monash University, VIC.

  • Feldhusen, J. H. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills a personality factors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: New area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: Something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. In J. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development (pp. 272–287). New York City: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. (1976). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, R. (2008). Creating creativity in the design studio: Assessing the impact of metacognitive skill development on creative abilities. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University.

  • Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huitt, W. (1997). Metacognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved February, 2006, from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/metacogn.html.

  • Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem solving. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., Schwennsen, D., Thomas, A., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2002). The redesign of studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architecture Students.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, T. (2001). The problem in studio teaching—revisiting the pedagogy of studio teaching. 1st ACAE conference on architectural education (pp. 95–105). In T. Milton (Ed.), Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture: National University of Singapore.

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, J. T. (1985). Design for human ecosystems. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, R. S., Busse, T. V., & Krepelka, E. J. (1978). The effectiveness of creative training. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 87–101). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnes, S. J. (1981). The magic of your mind. Buffulo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesut, D. J. (1990). Creative thinking as a self-regulatory metacognitive process—A model for education, training and research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A. (2005). New trends in architectural education: Designing the design studio. North Carolina, USA: Tailored text and unlimited potential publishing. Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A. (2008). A theory for integrating knowledge in architectural design education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 100–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). Child as a co-investigator: Helping children gain insight into their own mental processes. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 66–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Ealbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Temple-Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). On the development of adult metacognition. In C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning, development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 89–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Brooks, D. (1999). Helping students self-regulate in math and science courses: Improving the will and the skill. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-fact model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W. (1987). A high-tech high-touch concept of creativity—With its complexity made simple for wide adaptability. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers on creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 131–155). Buffulo, NY: Bearly.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (2000). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America. Washington D.C.: Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan A. Hargrove.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hargrove, R.A. Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 489–517 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6

Keywords

Navigation