The origins and underpinning principles of e-scape

Article

Abstract

In this article I describe the context within which we developed project e-scape and the early work that laid the foundations of the project. E-scape (e-solutions for creative assessment in portfolio environments) is centred on two innovations. The first concerns a web-based approach to portfolio building; allowing learners to build their portfolios in real-time, directly from hand-held peripheral technologies in studios, workshops, laboratories, and from off-site settings. The second concerns the development of a radical web-based approach to the assessment of performance as captured in these portfolios. In many parts of the world, portfolios feature as part of school-based assessments—including those undertaken for school-leaving and certification purposes. In this setting assessment reliability is critical and (judged by practice in England & Wales) is typically far from satisfactory. The approach developed within e-scape has radically improved assessment reliability. Whilst these two innovations represent the most dramatic outcomes of the project, they arose from a set if principles held by the team of researchers in the Technology Education Research Unit (TERU) at Goldsmiths University of London. And central to these principles is that both the portfolio and the assessment approaches should be embedded in a view of active learning, such that engagement with them has a positive impact on classroom practice. As the title suggests, this paper outlines the origins, underlying principles and early development of project e-scape.

Keywords

Web-portfolio Performance assessment Creative Collaborative learning Hand-held-digital Comparative judgement 

References

  1. Black, P., & William, D. (2003). Assessment for learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Calvez, J. P., Wyche, A., & Edmundson, C. (1993). Embedded real-time systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Department for Education & Skills (DFES). (2005). Harnessing technology: Transforming learning and children’s services: DFES e-strategy. Available at www.dfes.gov.uk/publications/e-strategy.
  4. Drabble, G. (2000). The identification of factors contributing to the relative underachievement of boys in design and technology. Loughborough: Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (QCA) Moderators Conference.Google Scholar
  5. Hillary, N. (2005). Measuring performance for real-time systems. Document Number: GRNTEEPFRMNCWP 1-800-521-6274, 480-768-2130 Freescale Semiconductor Literature Distribution Center P.O. Box 5405 Denver, Colorado 80217.Google Scholar
  6. Ive, M. (2001). Design & technology: Lessons from the past—issues for the future. An address to the National Conference of the Advisers and Inspectors of Design & Technology (NAAIDT), Nottingham.Google Scholar
  7. Kimbell, R., Miller, S., Bain, J., Wright, R., Wheeler, T., & Stables, K. (2004). Assessing design innovation: A research and development project for the Department for Education & Skills (DfES) and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). London UK: Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths University of London.Google Scholar
  8. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wozniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design & technology. Schools Examination and Assessment Council (SEAC) Central Office of Information 6/91 HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Mason, R., Pegler, C., & Weller, M. (2004). e-portfolios: An assessment tool for on-line courses. In British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 35 No 6 29/10/2004.Google Scholar
  10. Mohd Adnan, M. (1993). The role of performance assessment in real-time system management. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 7(4), 224–236.Google Scholar
  11. Nesta Futurelab (Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead, D). (2005). Literature review of E-assessment Research Report 10 Nesta Futurelab. Available at http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/reviews/10_01.htm.
  12. Schulman, L. (1998). Teacher portfolios. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stables, K., & Kimbell, R. (2000). The unpickled portfolio: Pioneering performance assessment in design and technology’ D&T international millennium conference: Learning from experience: Modelling new futures, DATA, Wellesbourne, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goldsmiths University of LondonNew Cross, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations