Abstract
This paper, based in Northern Ireland, is a case study of an innovative programme which places year 3 B.Ed. post-primary student teachers of Technology and Design into industry for a five-day period. The industrial placement programme is set in an international context of evolving pre-service field placements and in a local context defined by the Northern Ireland Curriculum (CCEA 2007); a rationale for the inclusion of Technology and Design within that curriculum; and the promotion of a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) agenda. Undertaken in collaboration with a range of industrial partners, the placements aim to give the student teachers an opportunity to spend time in industry. All the students concerned started their teacher education degree straight from school and therefore are without industrial experience. As a result of the placements the students gained valuable industrial experience and thereby further enhanced their working knowledge and understanding in their main subject area of Technology and Design, in particular, and other curricular areas, in general. The students report many benefits, both personally and professionally, to be gained from the placements typically the opportunity to see a range of industrial processes, many of which they are required to teach, and to gain a better understanding of the link between content of Technology and Design education and the activities of industry. This case study is based on feedback from the 2010 to 2011 cohort of students whose comments confirm the inherent value of exposing student teachers to industrial environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbott, I. (1991). Science and technology education. Education and Training, 33(1), 5–7.
Abbott, I., Huddleston, P., & Foley, M. (1993). Working with industry in initial teacher education. Education and Training, 35(5), 30–32.
Barlex, D. (2000). Preparing D&T for 2005—moving beyond the rhetoric: The DATA lecture. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(1), 5–15.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2001). How to research. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Brown, G., & Ahmed, Y. (2009) The value of work placements. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education, 1(1), 19–29.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Council for the Curriculum, Examinations, Assessment. (2007). The statutory curriculum at key stage 3: Rationale and detail. Belfast: CCEA.
CSFC. (2010). Transforming education outside the classroom: Sixth report of session 2009–10, children. House of Commons, HMSO: Schools and Families Committee.
Dahncke, H. (1993). Leadership styles in teacher education and industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(1), 21–39.
Davies, D. (2003). Paradigm? what paradigm? Journal of Design and Technology Education, 7(3), 157–164.
Dearden, G., (1989) Learning while earning: Work based learning—case study of learning contracts http://www.learningexperience.org.uk/downloads/learning-while-earning.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2011.
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2005) Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Learning in Everyday Life, 89(5), 745–778.
Donnelly, J. F. (1992). Technology in the school curriculum: A critical bibliography. Studies in Science Education, 20, 123–156.
Eggleston, J. (1993). The politics of technology education. Design and Technology Association Teaching, 3(2), 59–64.
EQUIPE (2009) Industrial placements for engineering students: A guide for academics, The Higher Educattion Academy—Engineering Subject Centre, http://www.engcetl.ac.uk/downloads/publications/RJN_EngSC_Guide_For_Academics. Accessed March 8, 2011.
Gibson, K. S. (2008). Technology and technological knowledge: A challenge for school curricula. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 3–14.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Lincoln & Y. S. Denzin (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Hendley, D., & Lyle, S. (1996). Pupils’ perceptions of design and technology: A case-study of pupils in South Wales. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(2), 141–151.
Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 1–36.
Ladd, H. L. (2007). Teacher labor markets in developed countries. The Future of Children, 17(1), 201–217.
Mawson, B. (2006). Designers as teachers and learner: Transferring workplace design practice into educational setting. Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 163–177.
McCormick, R. (1993). Technology education: What do we need to clear up the mess? Studies in Science Education, 22, 143–153.
McRobbie, C. J., Ginns, I. S., & Stein, S. J. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 81–101.
Medway, P. (1989). Issues in the theory and practice of technology education. Studies in Science Education, 16, 1–24.
Peacock, A. (2006) Changing minds: The lasting impact of school trips http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-schools-guardianships-changing_minds.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2011.
Penny, A. J., & Harley, K. (1995). Broadening the experiences of teachersin- training: A South African study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 21(2), 163–175.
Purdy, N. & Gibson, K. (2008) Alternative placements in initial teacher education: An evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8) 2076–2086.
Shore, S. (2002). Links with industry: to what extent is it possible to establish effective links to benefit all partners? In S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes (Eds.), Issues in design and technology teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Silverman, D. (2002). Interpreting qualitative data–methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Limited.
Solomon, J. (1995). Teaching STS: Games. Simulation and Role-play in Banks, F. (Ed) Teaching Technology, London: Routledge.
Stachowski, L. J., & Mahan, J. M. (1998). Cross-cultural field placements: Student teachers learning from schools and communities. Theory into Practice, 37(2), 155–162.
Stein, S. J., Ginns, I. S., & McDonald, C. V. (2007). Teachers Learning about technology and technology education: Insights from a professional development experience. Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 179–195.
Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. (2000). Recognising uniqueness in the technology key learning area: The search for meaning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 105–123.
STEM (2009) Report of the STEM review. Belfast: Department of Employment and Learning/Department of Education.
UKCES (2010) Employability: Incentivising improvement, UK Commission for Employment and Skills, http://www.ukces.org.uk/upload/pdf/424704_UKCES_Employability_AW_2.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2011.
Wallace, R., Murray, R. & Overton, T. (2009) Good practice in industrial work placement, learning and teaching support network, LTSN Physical Science Centre http://www.asetonline.org/documents/ps0077_good_practice_in_industrial_work_palcement_sept_2003.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2011.
Willard-Holt, C. (2001). The impact of a short-terminternational experience for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 505–517.
Williams, P. J. (2000). Design: The old methodology of technology. Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 48–60.
Williams, A., & Williams, P. J. (1997). Problem-based learning: An appropriate methodology for technology education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(1), 91–103.
Wright, R. (2001). The engineering council supporting curriculum debate and innovation. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 6(2), 116–124.
Yeomans, D. (1998). Vocationalising the design and technology curriculum: A case study from post-compulsory education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 281–306.
Young, J. (2002). Design and technology and the community in Owen-Jackson. G. (Ed) Design and Technology in the Secondary School, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Yu, J. -C., & Yang, H. -J. (2009). Incorporating museum experience into an in-service programme for science and technology teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 417–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, K. Student teachers of technology and design into industry: a Northern Ireland case study. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 289–311 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9179-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9179-z


