Skip to main content
Log in

A pilot study of the epistemological beliefs of students in industrial-technical fields

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An investigation of the epistemological beliefs of apprentices in the commercial engineering sector is of interest for vocational training, both from the point of view of optimising vocational didactic processes as well as in terms of communicating suitable knowledge based beliefs about principles and performance in the commercial engineering field. This article reports on a seminal study, in which 50 apprentices in the occupational fields: construction, electrical engineering and mechanical engineering were interviewed about their knowledge-related beliefs. The results include explorative data and highlight difficulties encountered during the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomè, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for human- and social scientists]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 385–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Education Research, 45, 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, H. D. (1994). Pädagogisches Verstehen [Pedagogical understanding]. In: Verstehen: psychologischer Prozess und didaktische Analyse. Bern: Reusser, K. (Hrsg.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Epistemic dimensions of students`mathematics-related belief systems. International Journal of Education Research, 45, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Institute for Vocational Education (2009). Datenreport zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2009 [Data report on the vocational training report]. Retrieved on 03.01.2010 at http://datenreport.bibb.de/media2009/datenreport_bbb_090525_screen.pdf.

  • Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern [Attitudes towards mathematics of mathematics teachers]. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 19(1), 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, N., Wahl, D., Schlee, J. & Scheele, B. (1988). Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien. Eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflexiven Subjekts [Research program Subjective Theories. An indroduction to the psychology of the reflexive subject]. Francke.

  • Halloun, I. (1996). Views about Science and Physics Achievement. The VASS Story. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, A. (2003): Unterrichtsqualität—erfassen, bewerten, verbessern [Teaching quality—collect, evaluate, improve]. Kallmeyer: Seelze.

  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2005). The legacy and the challenge: Paul Pintrich’s contributions to personal epistemology research. Educational Psychologist, 40, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2006). Domain specifity of personal epistemology: Resolved questions, persistent issues, new models. International Journal of Education Research, 45, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2008). Personal epistemology and culture. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal Epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Neubrand, J. (2000). Epistemologische Überzeugungen und Fachverständnis im Mathematik- und Physikunterricht [Epistemological beliefs and understanding of science in mathematics and physics lessons]. In J. Baumert, W. Bos, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), TIMSS/III—Dritte Internationale Mathematik—und Naturwissenschaftsstudie—Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn. Band 2 (pp. 229–269). Leske, Budrich: Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limón, M. (2006). The domain generality-specificity of epistemological beliefs: A theoretical problem, a methodological problem or both? International Journal of Education Research, 45, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Zurlo, G. (2006). Epistemological understanding in different judgment domains: Relationships with gender, grade and curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken [Introduction to qualitative research. A guide to qualitative thinking]. Beltz: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2007). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis principles and techniques]. Beltz: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschner, B. & Gruber, H (2005). Epistemologische Überzeugungen [Epistemological beliefs]. (Forschungsbericht Nr. 18). Universität Regensburg, Institut für Pädagogik.

  • Müller, S. (2009). Methoden zur Erfassung epistemologischer Überzeugungen von Handelslehramtsstudierenden–eine empirische Vergleichsstudie [Methods for detection epistemological beliefs of student teachers trade–an empirical study comparing]. In K. Rebmann (Ed.), Schriften zur Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik. München: Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafson, L., & Schraw, G. (2006). Teachers`beliefs and practices within and across domains. International Journal of Education Research, 45, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priemer, B. (2006). Deutschsprachige Verfahren der Erfassung von epistemologischen Überzeugungen [German language method of detection of epistemological beliefs]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 12, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading Writing Q., 16, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI) (S. 261–275). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal Epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G. (2002). Epistemologische Grundüberzeugungen–verborgene Variablen beim Lehren und Lernen von Mathematik [Epistemological basic-beliefs–hidden variables in teaching and learning of mathematics]. Der Mathematikunterricht, 48, 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne, D. (2006). Die Bedeutung domänenspezifischer epistemologischer Überzeugungen für Motivation, Selbstkonzept und Lernstrategien von Studierenden [The importance of domain-specific epistemological beliefs, motivation, self-concept and learning strategies for students]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(3), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne, D., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2008). Welches Verständnis haben Jugendliche von der Natur der Naturwissenschaften? Entwicklung und erste Fortschritte zur Validierung eines Fragebogens [What do young people understand the nature of science? Development and initial progress to validate a questionnaire]. Unterrichtswissenschaften Zeitschrift für Lernforschung, 36(1), 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, B., & Tenberg, R. (2010). Forschungsprogramm: Epistemologische Überzeugungen in gewerblich-technischen Domänen [Research program: Epistemological beliefs in commercial and technical domains]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (ZBW), 106, 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Zinn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinn, B. A pilot study of the epistemological beliefs of students in industrial-technical fields. Int J Technol Des Educ 22, 361–375 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9153-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9153-9

Keywords

Navigation