Abstract
The article examines how professionals within technical businesses describe their ways into their trade and why they have remained. Semi-structured interviews, analyzed by analysis of narratives, have been conducted with six informants within pipefitting and industrial work aiming to understand how technically oriented professions can attract young potentials into the field. The results from the study are thus a contribution within the field of vocational education, in order to understand why youths should consider to study the Energy Programme or the Industry Programme at upper secondary school. The results show that factors that influence people to start working within technically oriented trades are: (1) to use your hands to screw things together, (2) to get an income and (3) if relatives work in the branch. Based on the study it is not obvious to young people what they want to do when they have graduated. But the study also shows that even though the choice of careers is not obvious from the beginning people who chose the field of pipefitting or industry remain for many years. This implies that programmes for recruitment could use the advantages shown in this study for arguments to increase the amount of students who chose the technically oriented educations. The reasons for staying in the professions are: (1) variation and freedom, (2) creativity and influence and (3) you get to work with your hands. This significant content within the technically oriented trades contribute with specific arguments for promotion of the plumbing and industrial work in particular and also for the technical trades and technical education in general.
Notes
All names in the article are fictitious.
All quotes from the interviews are the author’s translations from Swedish and marked by quotation marks.
The Swedish royal Vasa ship sank in the middle of Stockholm harbor during the maiden voyage in 1628.
References
Achtenhagen, F., & Oldenbürger, H. (1996). Goals for further vocational education and training: The view of employees and the view of superiors. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(5), 387–401. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)81234-7.
Auyeung, P., & Sands, J. (1997). Factors influencing accounting students’ career choice: A cross-cultural validation study. Accounting Education, 6(1), 13–23. doi:10.1080/096392897331596.
Bengtsson, J. (Ed.). (2005). Med livsvärlden som grund: Bidrag till utvecklandet av en livsvärldsfenomenologisk ansats i pedagogisk forskning (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bjurulf, V., & Kilbrink, N. (2008). The importance of interweaving theoretical and practical tasks in technology education. In H. Middleton & M. Pavlova (Eds.), Exploring technology education: Solutions to issues in a globalised world. Australia: Griffith University.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
De Fina, A. (2009). Narratives in interview: The case of accounts. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 233–258. doi:10.1075/ni.19.2.03def.
Frost, F. (1992). The effect of promotion on career path choice amongst secondary school pupils. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 14(3), 295–314. doi:10.1080/10408347308003991.
Goodson, I. F. (1996). Att stärka lärarnas röster: Sex essäer om lärarforskning och lärar-forskarsamarbete (G. Arfwedson & I. Gerner Translator). Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Karlsson, M. (2006). Föräldraidentiteter i livsberättelser (Uppsala Studies in Education, nr. 112). Uppsala: Doktorsavhandling, Uppsala universitet.
Leung, A. S. (1998). Vocational identity and career choice congruence of giftes and talented high school students. Counselling Psychology Quarterby, 11(3), 325–335. doi:10.1080/09515079808254064.
Pérez Prieto, H. (1992). Skola och erfarenhet: Elevernas perspektiv (Uppsala Studies in Education, nr. 43). Uppsala: Doktorsavhandling, Uppsala universitet.
Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 5–23). London: Falmer Press.
Rhöse, E. (2003). Läraridentitet och lärararbete: Fem livsberättelser (Karlstad University studies, nr. 32). Karlstad: Doktorsavhandling, Karlstad universitet.
SFS 2003:460. Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor. Stockholm: Riksdagen.
Sveriges Riksdag. (2009). Förordning (2007:1349) om försöksverksamheten med gymnasial lärlingsutbildning. http://www.riksdagen.se/webbnav/index.aspx?nid=3911&bet=2007:1349 Accessed 9 July 2010.
Säljö, R. (2002). Lärande i det 21:a århundradet. In R. Säljö & J. Linderoth (Eds.), Utm@ningar och e-frestelser: IT och skolans lärkultur (pp. 13–29). Stockholm: Prisma.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 49, 13–14 (2006/962/EC).
Utbildningsdepartementet. (2008). Kommittédirektiv (dir. 2008: 96). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
Vásquez, C. (2009). Examining the role of face work in a workplace complaint narrative. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 259–279. doi:10.1075/ni.19.2.04vas.
Vetenskapsrådet. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Interview questions
-
How long have you been working for this company?
-
How come that you did start working here?
-
What did you do before you came here? (other jobs, education, etc.)
-
What would you work with if you were not working here?
-
What do you like the most about your job?
-
What do you like the least about it?
-
What do you think you will be doing in 5 years? 10 years?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bjurulf, V. Reasons for choosing a technically oriented education: an interview study within the fields of pipefitting and industry. Int J Technol Des Educ 22, 377–397 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9141-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9141-5