Abstract
This paper describes pedagogic research to instigate, support and understand a significant change in the education of undergraduate industrial design students. Design educators at Loughborough University, UK, have proposed that it will be critical for future industrial designers to learn new knowledge and abilities which will enable them to successfully operate at the ‘fuzzy front end’ of new product development. This is an arena before a traditional design brief exists (i.e. ‘pre-brief’), and typically involves in-depth investigation of such issues as users, experiences and brand, followed by exploitation of the findings. Curriculum development and new teaching, evolved over five annual cycles of implementation, reflection, planning and new implementation, is described. A model of the activities and processes of this ‘pre-brief’ arena is presented. Through structured investigation of the cycles of improvement and follow-up evaluation research, evidence gathered from stakeholders (students, educators, and industry) indicates that industrial design students can be taught to successfully operate at this fuzzy front end, and that this can be a highly effective strategy for students in their design project work. It also suggests that the students’ enhanced abilities will be in demand following their graduation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexis, J. (2006) Needs clusters: A research strategy for accelerating user centered design innovation. IIT Institute of Design http://trex.id.iit.edu/papers/alexis_needsclusters.pdf. Accessed 16 August 2007.
Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.
Brown, T. (2006). Innovation through design thinking. Presentation at MIT sloan school of management, 16 March 2006. http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/357. Accessed 28 March 2007.
Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. M. (2001). Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strengths. London: HM Treasury.
Deschamps, J.-P., & Nayak, P. R. (1995). Product Juggernauts: How companies mobilize to generate a stream of market winners. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Design Council. (2010). How to write a design brief. http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/About-Design/Design-Techniques/Briefing-by-Peter-L-Phillips/. Accessed 11 March 2010.
Industrial Design Society of America (IDSA). (2010). ID defined. http://www.idsa.org/. Accessed 11 March 2010.
Juratovac, J. (2005). Building a bridge to the end user: How industrial designers contribute to new product development. In K. B. Khan (Ed.), The PDMA handbook of new product development (2nd ed., pp. 389–405). New York: Wiley.
Khurana, A., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1997). Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. Sloan management review 1997. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Khurana, A., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1998). Toward holistic “Front Ends” in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 57–74.
Koen, P. A., Ajamian, G., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., et al. (2002). Fuzzy-front end: Effective methods, tools and techniques. In P. Belliveau, A. Griffen, & S. Sorermeyer (Eds.), The PDMA toolbook for new product development (pp. 2–35). New York: Wiley.
Lofthouse, V. (2008). Discrete observation as a method of identifying real design needs. In New perspectives in design education 10th international conference on engineering & product design education, Barcelona, September 2008 (pp. 180–185). Institution of engineering designers and the design society.
Lopes, A. M. (2008). Designed inquiry: The significance of research education for industrial designers. In New perspectives in design education 10th international conference on engineering & product design education, Barcelona, September 2008 (pp. 132–137). Institution of engineering designers and the design society.
Norman, E. (1999). Action research concerning technology for design and associated pedagogy. Educational Action Research, 7(2), 297–308.
Rodgers, P. A. & Anusas, M. (2008). Ethnography and design. In New perspectives in design education 10th international conference on engineering & product design education, Barcelona, September 2008 (pp. 186–191). Institution of engineering designers and the design society.
Roozenburg, N. J. M., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: Fundamentals and methods. New York: Wiley.
Siu, K. W. M. (2003). Nurturing all-round engineering and product designers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 243–254.
Siu, K. W. M. (2007). Guerrilla wars in everyday public spaces: Reflections and inspirations for designers. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 37–56.
Smith, M. K. (2007). ‘Action research’, the encyclopaedia of informal education. http://www.infed.org/research/b-actres.htm. Accessed 24 July 2009.
Squires, S., & Byrne, B. (2002). Creating breakthrough ideas: The collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Stappers, P. J., & Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2007). Bringing participatory techniques to industrial design engineers. In Shaping the future? 9th International conference on engineering & product design education, Newcastle Upon Tyne, September 2007 (pp. 117–122). Institution of engineering designers and the design society.
Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., & Klok, J. (2007). Early user involvement in research and design projects—A review of methods and practices. In 23rd EGOS Colloquium, Vienna, July 2007. European group for organizational studies.
Veryzer, R. W. (2005a). Enhancing new product development success through industrial design strategy. In K. B. Khan (Ed.), The PDMA handbook of new product development (2nd ed., pp. 378–388). New York: Wiley.
Veryzer, R. W. (2005b). The roles of marketing and industrial design in discontinuous new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 22–41.
Wormald, P. W., & Rodber, M. J. (2008). Aligning industrial design education to emerging trends in professional practice and industry. Journal of Design Research, 7(3), 294–303.
Zhang, Q., & Doll, W. J. (2001). The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: A causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4, 95–112.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the contribution in the development of teaching and learning material and curriculum development of Mr Michael Rodber, Dr Rebecca Cain and Mr Ian Storer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wormald, P.W. Positioning industrial design students to operate at the ‘fuzzy front end’: investigating a new arena of university design education. Int J Technol Des Educ 21, 425–447 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9133-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9133-5