Abstract
The investigation reported here dealt with the study of motivation for creativity. The goals were to assess motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students based on the Cognitive Orientation theory which defines motivation as a function of a set of belief types, themes, and groupings identified as relevant for the development of creativity. Differences between the two groups of students were expected in some of the scores of the belief types, themes, and groupings. Participants were 112 students (52 from architecture, and 60 from engineering) who were administered the questionnaire of the Cognitive Orientation of Creativity. Significant differences in numerous motivational contents were observed between the groups of students. Major characteristics of the architectural design students were an emphasis on the inner world, inner-directedness, and a development of the self, and of the engineering design students being receptive to the environment, and demanding from oneself despite potential difficulties. The findings provide insights for intervention programs targeted at improving architectural and engineering design education.

Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
Arnon, R., & Kreitler, S. (1984). Effects of meaning training on overcoming functional fixedness. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 3, 11–24.
Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 63, 436–451.
Casakin, H., Davidovitch, N., & Milgram, R. M. (2009). Creative thinking as a predictor of creative problem-solving in architectural design. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (Accepted).
Casakin, H., & Kreitler, S. (2008a). Correspondences and divergences in creativity: Evaluations between architects and students. Environmental Planning and Design: Design B, 35, 666–678.
Casakin, H., & Kreitler, S. (2008b). Motivational aspects of creativity in students and architects: Implications for education. In A. Clarke, M. Eyatt, P. Hogart, J. Lloveras, L. Pons (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on engineering and product design education, 4–5 September, Barcelona.
Christiaans, H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 41–54.
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Conti, R., Collins, M. A., & Picariello, M. L. (2001). The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: Considering gender, gender segregation and gender role orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1273–1289.
Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18, 427–455.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity-flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Franken, R. (2001). Human motivation (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Ghandi. New York: Basic Books.
Gero, J. S. (2000). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge Based Systems, 9(7), 435–448.
Giessen, E., & Kreitler, S. (2009). Creativity and inventiveness in engineering students. Creativity Research Journal (Submitted).
Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (2008). Preventing talent loss. New York: Routledge.
Kaufman, C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2006). International handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kreitler, S. (2004). The cognitive guidance of behavior. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & P. A. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The Yin and Yang of scientific progress (pp. 113–126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kreitler, S., & Casakin, H. (2009). Self-perceived creativity: The perspective of design. The European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 194–203.
Kreitler, S., Chaitchik, S., Kreitler, H., & Weissler, K. (1994). Who will attend tests for the early detection of breast cancer? Psychology and Health, 9, 463–483.
Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1976). Cognitive orientation and behavior. New York: Springer.
Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1982). The theory of cognitive orientation: Widening the scope of behavior prediction. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 11, 101–169.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1987a). Plans and planning: Their motivational and cognitive antecedents. In S. L. Friedman, E. K. Scholnick, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development (pp. 110–178). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1987b). The motivational and cognitive determinants of individual planning. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 113, 81–107.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1988a). The cognitive approach to motivation in retarded individuals. In N. W. Bray (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 61–123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 15.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1988b). Horizontal decalage: A problem and its resolution. Cognitive Development, 4, 89–119.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1990a). The cognitive foundations of personality traits. New York: Plenum.
Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1990b). Cognitive primacy, cognitive behavior guidance and their implications for cognitive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 4, 155–173.
Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1994). Motivational and cognitive determinants of exploration. In H. Keller, K. Schneider, & B. Henderson (Eds.), Curiosity and exploration (pp. 259–284). New York: Springer.
Kvan, T., & Yunyan, J. (2005). Students’ learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26(1), 19–34.
Lepper, M., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. (1973). Understanding children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.
Margaliot, A. (2005). A model for teaching the cognitive skill of melioration to pre-service science teachers in a college for teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Miao, C. F., Evans, K. R., & Shaoming, Z. (2007). The role of salesperson motivation in sales control systems—intrinsic and extrinsic motivation revisited. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 417–425.
Milgram, R. M. (1989). Teaching gifted and talented children learners in regular classrooms. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Richter, R. (2003). Cognitive orientation when creatively solving engineering and business problems. Unpublished master’s thesis in Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity as an extracognitive phenomenon. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 17–25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Runco, M. A. (2005). Motivation, competence, and creativity. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 609–623). New York: Guilford.
Sim, S. K., & Duffy, A. H. B. (2004). Knowledge transformers—a link between learning and creativity. AI EDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufactoring, 18(3), 271–279.
Uloglu, B. (2000). Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies, 21, 33–58.
Wong, S. C., & Ladkin, A. (2008). Exploring the relationship between employee creativity and job-related motivators in the Hong Kong hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Managment, 27, 426–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casakin, H., Kreitler, S. Motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students: implications for design education. Int J Technol Des Educ 20, 477–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9103-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9103-y
