Abstract
Technology and design was added to the Northern Ireland curriculum in September 1992 and through it, teachers seek to address the need for pupils to understand the ever-changing man-made world by developing skills and understanding in its four elements of designing, communicating, manufacturing and the use of energy and control. To be effective in attaining these goals, it is important that teachers allow pupils to have a voice in their learning. They should do this by taking account of pupil responses to the tasks they issue and using those responses as a basis for making choices about instruction and support strategies. This is particularly important in technology and design as pupils need to interpret instructions in light of their design ideas. This paper outlines how three case studies of technology and design teaching were used to identify a range of teaching and learning strategies and evaluate them for their potential to create a learning dialogue with pupils. Drawing on aspects of the effective teaching debate, this learning dialogue was then applied to how teachers exploited pupil histories, managed a range of collaboration strategies and provided effective task orientation. The case studies were based on observations, interviews and content analysis of work over a complete design-and-make project in each school. The paper outlines three continua for effectiveness in each of the three areas observed. The first continuum shows that teachers need a more individualised view of building on pupil histories, the second outlines a range of strategies for the management of pupil collaboration in learning and the third suggests that pupils need to be orientated into complex tasks in ways that support a progressively increasing level of independence in their thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ancram, M. (1994). Changes to the primary curriculum. A speech made to Education Community in Northern Ireland. 31 May 1994, Northern Ireland Office, Belfast.
Anning, A., Jenkins, E., & Whitelaw, S. (1996). Bodies of knowledge and design-based activities. In J. S. Smith (Ed,), IDATER 1996. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
Banks, F., Leach, J., & Moon, B. (1999). New understandings of teachers' pedagogic knowledge. In J. Leach, & B. Moon, B (Eds,). Learners and Pedagogy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: OUP.
Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrea, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1).
Bruner, J. (1999). Folk pedagogies. In: J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University.
Burns, G. (2001). Education for the 21st Century, Report by the Post-Primary Review Body Department of Education, Bangor: NI.
Chitty, C. (2004). Education policy in Britain. In: J. Benyon, (Series Ed.), Contemporary political studies. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Dearing, R. (1994). The national curriculum and its assessment final report. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
Denscome, M. (1998). The good research guide. Milton Keynes: OUP.
Department of Education, Education and Training Inspectorate (2000). The education reform programme: A survey of science and technology and design (1999–2000). Bangor, NI.
Department of Education (2004). Future post-primary arrangements in Northern Ireland: Advice from the post-primary review working group (The Costello Report). Bangor, NI.
Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office (1988). Task group on assessment and testing report: A digest for schools. London.
Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office (1989). Design and technology for ages 5 to 16, (Proposals of the Secretary of State for Education and Science and the Secretary of State for Wales). National Curriculum Council, York.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1988). Education in Northern Ireland: Proposals for Reform. Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1992). Circular Number 1992/18, Cuurriculum (Programmes of Study and Attainment Target for Technology and Design) Order (Northern Ireland) 1992, DENI, Bangor, NIEducation for the 21st Century, Report by the Post-Primary Review Body Department of Education, Bangor: NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1995). Circular Number 1995/28, Key Stage 4 Curriculum, Education Reform (1989 order), (Commencement Order No 5), (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 1995. Subject orders for technology and design, art and design, music and modern languages. Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1996). Circular Number 1996/20. Curriculum (Programmes of Study and Attainment Targets at Key Stages 1 and 2) Order (Northern Ireland) 1996. Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1996). Circular Number 1996/21. Northern Ireland Curriculum: 1996 Subject Orders for Key Stages 3 and 4. Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1996). Circular Number 1996/32. The Education (1996 Order) (Commencement No. 1) Order. (Northern Ireland) 1996, Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1998). A strategy for education technology in Northern Ireland. Bangor, NI.
Department of Education Northern Ireland (1999). Circular Number 1999/18. The Northern Ireland Curriculum: Subject Orders for Home Economics and Technology and Design at Key Stages 3 and 4. Bangor, NI.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Doherty, P., Huxtable, J., Murray, J., & Gillett, E. (1994). Planning for capability and progression for design and technology in the national curriculum. In: F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology. London: Routledge in Association with the Open University.
Eggleston, J. (1976). Developments in design education. London: Open Books.
Frazer, D. (1999). QSR NUD*IST Vivo reference guide (1st ed.). Melbourne: Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty.
Garner, S. (1994). The importance of graphic modelling in design activity. In: F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology (pp. 68–73). London: Routledge in Association with the Open University.
Goodson, I.F. (1994). Studying curriculum. In A. Hargreaves (Ed,). Modern educational thought series. OUP: Milton Keynes.
Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (1999). Pedagogy in the secondary school. In: P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: PCP.
Harris, A. (1998). Effective teaching: A review of the literature. School Leadership and Management, 18(2), 169–183.
Hay McBer (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. A report by Hay McBer for the Department for Education and Employment, DfEE, London.
Helsby, G., & McCollough, G. (1997). Teachers and the national curriculum. In A. Hargreaves (Ed,). Teacher development series. London: Cassell.
Hennessy, S., Mc Cormick, R., & Murphy, P. (1993). The myth of general problem solving capability: Design and technology and as example. The Curriculum Journal, 4(1), 73–89.
Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in D&T. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.
Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203–220.
Kimbell, R. A., Stables, K., Wheeler, A. D., Woziniak, A. V., & Kelly, A. V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology. The final report of the Assessment of Performance Unit Design and Technology Project 1985–1991. Schools Examination and Assessment Council, HMSO, London.
Kyriacou, C. (1985). Conceptualising research on effective teaching. British Journal of Education Psychology, 55(1), 148–155.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1994). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
McCormick, R. (1990). The evolution of current practice in technology education. A Paper Prepared for the NATO Advanced Research Workshops, NATO ASI Series (Vol. F78). Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
McCormick, R. (1999). Practical knowledge: A view from the snooker table. In R. McCormick, & C. Paechter (Eds.), Learning and Knowledge. London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (1994). Problem solving processes in technology education: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(3), 241–256.
McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving and the tyranny of product outcomes. DATA (The Design and Technology Association), 1(3), 230–241.
McNair, V., Dallat, J., & Clarke, R. B. (2000). Effective teaching: Questioning teachers’ interactions with pupils in technology and design. In: P. Roberts & E. W. L. Norman (Eds.), IDATER 2000 (pp. 128–133). Loughborough: Loughborough University.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective teaching, evidence and practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (2001). Realizing the potential – and lost opportunities – for collaboration in a D&T setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 203–237.
Northern Ireland Curriculum Council (1991). Proposals for technology and design in the Northern Ireland curriculum: Report of the Ministerial Technology and Design Working Group, NICC, Belfast.
Owen-Jackson, G. (2000). Planning your teaching. In: G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Learning to teach design and technology in the secondary school. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Roth, W. (1999). Authentic school science: Intellectual traditions. In: R. McCormick, C. Paechter (Eds.), Learning and knowledge. London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University.
Rogoff, B. (1999). Cognitive development through social interaction. In: P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners learning and assessment. London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University.
Schofiled, J. W. (1993). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In: M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues (Vol. 1, pp. 91–113). London: Open University, Paul Chapman Publishing.
Silcock, P. (1993). Can we teach effective teaching? Educational Review, 45(1).
Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.
Vadeboncoeur J. A. (1997). Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education. Bristol: The Flamer Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). In: M. Cole (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know? In: P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: PCP.
Wilson, S., & Cameron, R. (1996). Student teacher perception of effective teaching: A developmental perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 22(2).
Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2003). Designing the best: A review of effective teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 223–241.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNair, V., Clarke, R.B. Effective technology and design teaching: getting it right in the classroom. Int J Technol Des Educ 17, 271–290 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9003-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9003-3