Sparking self-sustained learning: report on a design experiment to build technological fluency and bridge divides
- 228 Downloads
In this article we report assessment results from two studies in an ongoing design experiment intended to provide a single school system with a sequence of secondary school level (ages 14–18) computer technology courses. In our first study, we share data on students’ learning as a function of the required introductory course and their pre-course history of technological experience. In order to go beyond traditional assessments of learning we assessed two aspects of students’ “learning ecologies”: their use of a variety of learning resources and the extent to which they share their knowledge about technology with others. In our second study we present patterns of course taking by male and female students who have almost completed their secondary schooling. In addition, we share case studies of students who elected to take more technology classes and leveraged their course experiences for internships, further education, and jobs. The quantitative and qualitative data are consistent with our hypothesis that students would become more technologically fluent and that their learning ecologies would diversify as a result of their project-based experiences.
KeywordsEquity Design experiment Learning resources technological fluency Professional development Computer science
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This project was developed with funds from the International Collaborative Education Foundation (ICEF). Support for idea development also came from the National Science Foundation (NSF REC 0354453, NSF REC - 0238524), Any opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies. We would like also to thank all of the teachers and students in Bermuda and members of the Stanford team including Robert Baesman, Shireen Brathwaite, Caroline Clabaugh, Nick Fang, Tom Fountain, Maria Fredricsson, Anita Garimella, Osvaldo Jimenez, Emma Lozman, Marissa Mayer, Jennifer McGrath, Emma Mercier, Alex Osipovich, Kristen Pilner, Michael Ross, Tenecia Sicard, Andrew Simons, Luke Swartz, and Shane Witnov.
- AAUW Educational Foundation. (2000). TechSavvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, D.C.: AAUW.Google Scholar
- American Computing Machinery (ACM). (2003). A model curriculum for k-12 computer science: Final report of the ACM K-12 task force curriculum committee. New York, NY: Computer Science Teacher’s Association.Google Scholar
- Barron, B. (in press). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development. To appear in Human Development.Google Scholar
- Barron, B., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, T., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project based-learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. J. (2001). Unpublished data from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing 1998 National Survey. Irvine: University of California.Google Scholar
- Becker, H., & Riel, M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Report from the Center for Research on Information Technology & Organizations. University of California, Irvine & University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Ben-Ari, M. (1998). Constructivism in computer science education. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, 30(1), 257–261.Google Scholar
- Bente, E. (1992). Girls and information technology in Denmark: An account of a socially constructed problem. Gender and Education, 4(1–2), 25–40.Google Scholar
- Bermuda Census Office. (2001). The 2000 census of population and housing. Hamilton, Bermuda.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain mind experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (vol. 24, pp. 61–101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S. (1999). Learning, working, and playing in the digital age http://www.serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_edu/seelybrown, accessed January 6, 2006.
- Bruner, J. S. (1994). The remembered self. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- California Council of Science and Technology (CCST). (2002). Critical path analysis of California’s Science and Technology Education System. Sacramento, CA: CCST. http://www.ccst.us/ccst/pubs/cpa/cpadex.html, accessed January 6, 2006.
- Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Chambers, S. M., & Clarke, V. A. (1987). Is inequity cumulative? The relationship between disadvantaged group membership and students’ computing experience, knowledge, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(4), 495–518.Google Scholar
- Chan, V., Stafford, K., Klawe, M., & Chen, G. (2000). Gender differences in Vancouver secondary students’ interests related to information technology careers. Paper presented at the Canadian coalition of women in engineering, science, trades, and technology.Google Scholar
- Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2005). A matter of degrees: Female underrepresentation in computer science programs cross-nationally. In J. McGrath Cohoon, & W. C. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on the reasons for underrepresentation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity and improvement (Research Report Series RR0-043). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Colley, A. (1998). Gender and subject choice in secondary education. In J. Radford (Ed.), Gender and choice in education and occupation. England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Commission for Unity and Racial Equality. (2002). Annual report on the workforce. http://www.portalimages.gov.bm/CURE/downloads/work_force_survey/2002_work_force_survey_report_0.pdf, downloaded January 6, 2006.
- Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST). (2001). Under-represented minorities in engineering: A progress report. A report for The American Association for the Advancement of Science Making Strides, an NSF Supported Initiative by the Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate Program (AGEP).Google Scholar
- Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST). (2004). STEM workforce data project: Report No. 2: Women in science and technology: The Sisyphean challenge of change. The second report in a series from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation-funded STEM Workforce Data Project.Google Scholar
- Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST). (2005). STEM workforce data project: Report No. 3:Sisyphus revisited: Minorities in STEM occupations, 1994–2004. The third report in a series from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation-funded STEM Workforce Data Project.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.Google Scholar
- ENWISE. (2004). Enwise report. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/research/ science-society/women/enwise/enwise_report_en.html, accessed December 14, 2005.
- Grossman, P., & Wineburg, S. (2000). What makes a teacher community different from a gathering of teachers? Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Gutierrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495–529.Google Scholar
- Hawley, B., & Valli, X. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Henwood, F., Kennedy, H., & Miller, N. (Eds.). (2001). Cyborg lives? Women’s technobiographies. York: Raw Nerve Books.Google Scholar
- Huchinson, M., & Weaver, C. (2004). Barriers to women studying information technology courses. Bulletin of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 2(3), http://www. naccq.ac.nz.bacit/0203/2004Huchinson_BarriersToWomen.htmGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, A., & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, & mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Linde, C. (1993). Life stories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Margolis, J., & Fischer, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mishler, E. (1996). Missing persons: Recovering developmental stories/histories. In A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 73–100). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for mathematics. Teston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.Google Scholar
- Pinkard, N. (2000). Lyric reader: An architecture for creating intrinsically motivating and culturally relevant reading environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
- Reich R. (2002). The future of success. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Roberts, E. (2000). Strategies for encouraging individual achievement in introductory computer science courses. In Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. Washington, DC: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
- Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schofield, J. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schollmeyer, M. (1996). Computer programming in high school vs. college. In Proceedings of the 26th SICCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 378–382). Washington, DC: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
- Selby, L. (1997). Increasing the participation of women in tertiary level computing courses: What works and why. Perth, Australia: Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.Google Scholar
- Staberg, E. M. (1996). Gendered voices from the natural science programme in Swedish upper secondary school: On the need for a more socially responsible science and technology.Paper from the conference of gender and science and technology, Ahmedabad, India.Google Scholar
- Stephenson, C. (2000). A report on high school computer science education in five U.S. states. Funded by IBM.Google Scholar