Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers learning about technology and technology education: Insights from a professional development experience

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of technology education in primary and secondary schools during the past 10–15 years around the world has presented a number of difficulties for teachers, primarily related to their coming to understand the phenomenon of technology and to conceptualise the technology learning area in line with national frameworks. This paper reports on a professional development experience that aimed to assist a small group of primary school teachers to develop their understandings of technology and technology education. A theoretical model framed a series of professional development interactions between the researchers and the experienced teachers who were new to teaching technology. Data sources included teacher interviews, video recordings of the activities, teacher made models, and extracts from their reflective journals. The study presented some insights into how professional development experiences for teachers new to technology could be organised and implemented to best support their developing technology practices and understandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anning, A. (1994). Dilemmas and opportunities of a new curriculum: Design and technology with young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (1994). Primary investigations – teachers’ resource book 5. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1999). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckinghamshire: SRHE & OU

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Hallam, S. (1999). Teaching for supercomplexity: A pedagogy for higher education. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 137–154). London: Paul Chapman

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (1999). No One forgets a good teacher! – what do ‘good’ technology teachers know? Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(3), 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., Barlex, D., Jarvinen, E-M., O’Sullivan, G., Owen-Jackson, G., & Rutland, M. (2004). DEPTH – Developing professional thinking for technology teachers: An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1996). Professional development: Practice as text, reflection as process, and self as locus. Australian Journal of Education, 40(3), 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation. (1994). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2000). New basics project technical paper. Retrieved 6 January, 2005, from http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/docs/nbftech.doc

  • Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: ITEA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. J. (1996). Perceptions about technology held by primary teachers in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Mather, V., & Carr, M. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education. Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, I., & Penny, A. (1997). Teacher perceptions of design and technology: A study of disjunction between policy and practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. (2002). New pedagogies in the knowledge society: Teaching for deep learning, conceptual understanding and generative thinking. Paper presented at the 30th annual conference of the Australian teacher education association (ATEA), Brisbane, Australia, July

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA). (2003). Technology: Years 1–10 syllabus. Brisbane: The State of Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1994). Helping children understand technology. Adelaide: Department of Education and Children’s Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. (2000). A model for the professional development of teachers in design and technology (ste99273.htm ®). Paper presented at the Australian association for research in education (AARE) annual conference, Melbourne, November–December, 1999. Available at: http://www.aare.edu.au/indexpap.htm

  • Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah J. Stein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, S.J., Ginns, I.S. & McDonald, C.V. Teachers learning about technology and technology education: Insights from a professional development experience. Int J Technol Des Educ 17, 179–195 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-0008-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-0008-8

Keywords

Navigation