Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A phenomenographic study of Greek primary school students’ representations concerning technology in daily life

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research investigated and studied students’ representations about daily life technologies, in a prospect of studying technology in Greek primary education. In the research participated 60 Greek primary school students aged 9 to 12 years old. Research data were collected through semi-structured, personal, clinical-type interviews. Each interview investigated student’s conceptions and views about the following thematic areas: the concept of technology, daily life technologies, technological change, and the impact of technology use in everyday life. Data analysis revealed that the majority of students equated technology with modern tools and appliances, especially with computers, TV, mobile phones, satellites and other micro- and macro-technologies, whereas experience based technologies (de Vries, Technology education: Beyond the “technology is applied science” paradigm. J. Technol. Edu. 8 (1996), 7) have been hardly recognized by them as technology. Also students’ representations can be categorized either as technology-oriented representations, which focus on a collection of technical means without reference to humans, or as human-oriented representations, focused on technical means with substantial reference to human needs and activities. Depending on these types of representations, students seem to conceive differently the nature of the problems, which they recognize that the wide use of technology causes mainly to the environment and the responsibility of the user for these problems. Moreover, it seems that the concept of technological change is a quite difficult one for the students. In order to help students form adequate representations about daily life technology and technological change an appropriate teaching approach was designed on the basis of these students’ representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bame, E. A., Dugger, W. E. Jr., & de Vries, M. J. (1993). Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology: PATT-USA. Journal of Technology Studies, 19(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, G.-L., Bruillard, E., & Dansac, C. (1999). ‘Educational Multimedia Task Force Project MM 1045, Représentation: Représentations, modèles et modélisations; implications sur les strategies éducatives et sur les processus d’apprentissage; synthèse bibliographique, Deliverable 01, Janvier 1999, Heraklion (Grèce): European Commission’s Educational Multimedia Task Force.

  • Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, L. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Education Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccarrelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajas, F. (2000). Research in technology education: what are we researching? A response to Theodore Lewis’. Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), Spring 2000, Available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v11n2/pdf/cajas.pdf

  • Clancey, W. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education, (5th ed.) London, England: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correand, I. (2001). Twelve years of technology education in France, England and Netherlands: How pupils perceive the subject? PATT 11 Conference Proceedings, 8–13 March 2001, Netherlands, http://www.iteawww/org/publications

  • De Vries, M. J. (1996). Technology education: Beyond the “technology is applied science” paradigm. Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. J. (2003a). The nature of technological knowledge: Extending empirically informed studies into what engineers know. Techné, 6(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. J. (2003b). Editorial. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. J., & Tamir, A. (1997). Shaping concepts of technology: What concepts and how to shape them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1982). Children’s learning in science. Educational Analysis, 4(2), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories in action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of student’s conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education 10, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In: Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.) Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greek Ministry of Education, website: www.ypepth.gr

  • Herschbach, D. R. (1995). ‘Technology as knowledge: Implications for instruction’, Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/pdf/herschbach.pdf

  • Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1997). The structure of technology knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITEA—International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for all Americans Project: A rationale and structure for the study of technology, http://www.iteawww.org

  • ITEA—International Technology Education Association (2000). Content for the study of technology. Standards for technological literacy, http://www.iteawww.org

  • Jones, A. (1997). Recent research in learning technological concepts and processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1993). Analysis of student technological capability, working papers of the learning in technology education project. University of Waikato, Hamilton: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. T., Mather, V., & Carr, M. D. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education, final report of the learning in technology education project. University of Waikato, Hamilton: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1992). A framework for technology education curricula which emphasizes intellectual processes. Journal of Technology Education, 3(2), http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v3n2/pdf/johnson.pdf

  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 1(2), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In: Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasly, S. D. (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1994). A school subject in the making? The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovation in science and technology education (pp. 1–2), vol 4. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education – some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), Available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v10n2/pdf/lewis.pdf

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, V. J., & Jones, A. (1995). Focusing on technology education: The effect of concepts on practice, S.E.T., 2, Item 9.

  • Mawson, B. (n.d.). Factors affecting children’s learning in technology, Retrieved November 6, 2005, from: http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/maw04115.pdf

  • McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (1994). Problem-solving processes in technology education: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1929/67). The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raat, J. H., Coenen-van den Bergh, R., Klerk Wolters, F., & de Vries, M. J. (Eds.) (1987). Report PATT Conference 1987, Volume 1, Proceedings, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

  • Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1994). Helping children understand technology: A handbook for teachers. Key Centre for Schools Science and Mathematics & Science, Curtin University, Perth & Technology Awareness Program, Australian Department of Industry, Science and Technology.

  • Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children’s choice of drawing to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L., & Jarvis, T. (1996). Understanding technology: The development of a concept. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 977–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomonidou, C., & Tasios, A. (2005). How do primary school pupils conceive technology and its use in everyday life? In P. Kommers, & G. Richards (eds.) Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada, 6-7/2005, AACE, pp. 1916–1923.

  • Tasios, A., & Solomonidou, C. (2002). Students’ (aged 9–12 years old) representations about everyday life technologies and the place of ICT in those representations. In A. Dimitracopoulou (Ed.) The Information and Communication Technologies in Education. Proceedings of the 3 rd Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation (Rhodes: TPE, University of Aegean, 9/2002). Athens: Kastaniotis editions inter@ctive, Vol. 1, pp. 379–390, (in Greek).

  • Tasios, A., & Solomonidou, C. (2004). Technology in everyday life according to primary school students’ conceptions. Educational Review, 38, 146–167 (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twyford, J., & Järvinen, E.-M. (2000). The formation of children’s technological concepts: A study of what it means to do technology from a child’s perspective’, Journal of Technology Education, 12(1). Retrieved November 6, 2005 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v12n1/pdf/twyford.pdf

  • Van Rensburg, S., Ankiewicz, P., & Myburgh, C. (1999). Assessing South Africa learners’ attitudes towards technology by using the PATT (Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology) questionnaire. International Journal for Technology and Design Education, 9(2), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: aspects of constructivism. In: Fosnot, C. (Ed.) Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 3–7). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, B. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development. Addison Wesley, Longman.

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuga, K. (1997). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuga, K. (2004). Improving technology education research on cognition. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Educational Technologies and Software Design, Pedagogical Department of Primary Education, University of Thessaly, Argonafton – Philellinon, 38221, Volos, Greece

    Christina Solomonidou & Athanassios Tassios

Authors
  1. Christina Solomonidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Athanassios Tassios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Solomonidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomonidou, C., Tassios, A. A phenomenographic study of Greek primary school students’ representations concerning technology in daily life. Int J Technol Des Educ 17, 113–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-0007-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-0007-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation