Skip to main content
Log in

Using ‘Electronic Portfolios’ to Challenge Current Orthodoxies in the Presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology Activity

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the extent to which a University undergraduate curriculum initiative provided initial teacher trainees with opportunities to challenge orthodox design methodologies through the production of an electronic portfolio within and extended design and technology activity. It was found that the ‘electronic portfolio’ served primarily as a developmental tool for promoting creative continuity and sound, reflective, design practice within a structured educational design challenge. The portfolio also provided a focus for the development of ‘e’ learning skills as it facilitated the use of new technologies in the compilation of the portfolio. Additionally, the portfolio provided trainees with a means by which they were able to demonstrate their capability to prospective employers. The use of the ‘electronic portfolio’ challenges current orthodoxy and methods routinely employed to present and assess trainees’ creative work, which have been shown to constrain innovative practice. The paper concludes that the use of the ‘electronic’ portfolio was successful in facilitating trainees’ engagement with a creative Design and Technology process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Barnes (1989) Art, Design and Topic Work 8–13 Allen & Unwin London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Barlex (2003) The Unique Contribution of Design and Technology: Building on Success Department for Education and Skills London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Bennett C. Desforges A. Cockburn B. Wilkinson (1984) The Quality of Pupil Learning Experiences Lawrence Erlbaum London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. G. Cross (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability’ Design Studies 11 IssueID3 127–140 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0142-694X(90)90002-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Holden (2001) ArticleTitle‘Hawthorne Effects and Research into Professional Practice’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001–2007 1 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, M. G., Hepton, B. & Downie, M.: 1999, ‘Supporting the Development of Creativity and Innovation – further issues examined as part of an extended curriculum development initiative’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 97–106, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

  • A. Hargreaves (2003) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Uncertainty Open University Press Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Krueger J. Wallace (1996) ArticleTitle‘Portfolio Assessment: Possibilities and Pointers for Practice, Australian’ Science Teacher’s Journal 42 IssueID1 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R. A., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wozniak, A. & Kelly, V.: 1991, The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology London. School Examinations and Assessment Council/Central Office of Information.

  • Kimbell, R.: 2005, Digital capture and the club med test. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 10, 2, 7–8, 2005, Design and Technology Association, Wellesbourne.

  • J. Lave (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.: 2004, Issues of Learning and Knowledge in Technology Education; International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, 21–44, 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

  • J. H. McMillan (2004) Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective instruction EditionNumber3 Pearson New York

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameOffice for Standards in Education (2000) Ofsted Subject Reports Secondary Design and Technology, 1999–2000 The Stationary Office London

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Prawat R. Floden (1994) ArticleTitle‘Philosophical Perspectives on Constructivist Views of Learning’ Educational Psychology 29 IssueID1 37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, K. & Kimbell, R. A.: 2000, ‘The Unpickled Portfolio: Pioneering Performance Assessment in Design and Technology.’ Design and Technology International Millennium Conference.

  • G. Shield (1996) ArticleTitle‘Learning Teaching through a Process Approach: The Implementation of Curriculum Innovation Through the Pragmatic Interventions of the Teacher’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 6 IssueID1 1–14 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00571069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Shulman (1998) Teacher Portfolios: A Theoretical Activity N. Lyons (Eds) With Portfolio in Hand Teachers College Press New York 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Spendlove, D. & Hopper, M.: 2004, ‘Creativity in Design and Technology and ICT: Imagining Possibilities in a Digital Age’, in E. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover & A. Mitchell (eds.), Creativity and Imagination – DATA International Research Conference July 2004, pp. 173 –178.

  • A. Strauss J. Corbin (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sturman (1999) Case Study Methods J. P. Keeves G. Lakomski (Eds) Issues in Educational Research Pergamon Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Thistlewood (1990) The Essential Disciplines of Design Education D. Thistlewood (Eds) Issues in Design Education Longman London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistlewood, D.: 1997, ‘Supporting Innovation in Schools Project: Factors Inhibiting Key Designer Attributes in Current NC Design and Technology Teaching’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research and Curriculum Development, pp. 243, Loughborough University, Loughborough.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Spendlove.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spendlove, D., Hopper, M. Using ‘Electronic Portfolios’ to Challenge Current Orthodoxies in the Presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology Activity. Int J Technol Des Educ 16, 177–191 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-3596-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-3596-9

Keywords

Navigation