Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between such factors as learning style, gender, prior experience, and successful achievement in contrasting modules taken by a cohort of thirty design and technology trainee teachers during their degree programme at a University in the North East of England. Achievement data were collected from three design and three electronic modules at levels 1, 2 and 3. Data concerning appropriate, previous experience before starting the course was obtained through a short questionnaire. The learning style of each member of the sample was ascertained using the Cognitive Style Analysis test. The findings from the study indicated that the learning style groupings were not as expected. A positive relationship between achievement and past experience in both electronics and design activity was found, although improvement for those with no prior experience in comparison to those with previous experience was only evident in electronics. A concern arising out of the data was the differences in terms of achievement between male and female students and also the difference in achievement when learning style and gender were scrutinised. The implications of the findings in relation to the success of the trainees as impending teachers of design and technology were discussed. The problems associated with the small cell size caused by splitting the sample by the three variables was acknowledged and a suggestion was made that further study would be required to ascertain whether the gender and learning style differences witnessed in this study would be replicated in a larger sample.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
F. Banks (2002) ‘Research in Design and Technology Education’ G. Owen-Jackson (Eds) Teaching Design and Technology in Secondary Schools Routledge Falmer London 299–317
J. B. Biggs P. J. Moore (1993) The Process of Learning EditionNumber3 Prentice Hall NJ
E. M. Bryne (1978) Women and Education Tavistock Publications London
S. Cassidy (2003) ‘Learning Styles: An overview of Theories, Models and Measures’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 80–102
F. Coffield K. Mosely K. Ecclestone E. Hall (2003) ‘A Systematic Review of Learning Styles and Pedagogy’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 115
Curry, L.: 1983, ‘An Organisation of Learning Style Theory and Constructs’, ERIC Document 235, 185.
H. G. Denton (1992) ‘The Design and Make Task (DMT): Some Reflections on Designing in Schools’ J. S. Smith (Eds) Design and Technology Loughborough University Loughborough 70–73
Design and Technology Association (DATA): 1995, Minimum Competencies for Students to teach Design and Technology in Secondary Schools–Research Paper No. 4. DATA, Wellesbourne.
R. Dunn (2003) ‘The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model: Theoretical Cornerstone, Research and Practical Applications’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003-Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 181–205
R. Dunn K. Dunn (1993) Teaching Elementary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 3–6 Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA
N. Entwistle P. Ramsden (1983) Understanding Student Learning Croom Helm Kent
C. Evans (2003) ‘Exploring the Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Teaching Style’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 206–229
C. Gilligan (1982) In a Different Voice Harvard University Press New York
K. M. Goldstein S. Blackman (1978) Cognitive Style: Five Approaches and Relevant Research Wiley New York
J. Harding M. Grant (1984) Girls and Technology Education Chelsea College London University, London
J. Harding (2002) ‘Gender and Design and Technology’ G. Owen-Jackson (Eds) Teaching Design and Technology in Secondary Schools Routledge Falmer London 237–248
A. Kelly B. Smail J. Whyte (1981) The Initial GIST Survey: Results and Implications GIST Manchester
Kelly, C. A.: 1999, ‘Gender and Inquiry: an Investigation into Identifying and Defining the Role of Inquiry in Higher-order Thinking, in M. Whitehead (ed.), European Journal of Teacher Education22(1), 101–114.
R. Kimbell K. Stables T. Wheeler A. Wosniak V. Kelly (1991) The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology: The Final Report of the APU Design and Technology Project 1985–91 School Examination and Assessment Council/Evaluation and Monitoring Unit London
D. A. Kolb (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of learning and Development Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
B. Lawson (1990) How Designers Think: the Design Process De-mystified EditionNumber2 Butterworth Architecture London
LJ Systems, Product information [Online] Available URL: www.ljgroup.com [Accessed: 05.07.07].
W. J. McKeachie P. Pintrich Y.G. Lin D. Smith (1986) Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom NCRIPTAL, University of Michigan MI
Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J.: 2002, The Reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Style Analysis Test [Online] Available URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? [Accessed: 05.07.04]..
J. Piaget (1936) The Origins of Intelligence in Children W. W. Norton New York
R. J. Riding (1991) Cognitive Style Analysis–Research Administration Learning and Training Technology Birmingham
R. J. Riding (1996) Learning Styles and Technology-based Training Department for Education and Science Sheffield
R. J. Riding (2002a) Cognitive Style Analysis–Research Administration Learning and Training Technology Birmingham
Riding, R. J.: 2002b, ‘On the Assessment of Cognitive Style: A Commentary on Peterson, Deary and Austin’, Personality and Individual Difference [On line] Available URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? [Accessed: 05.07.04]..
R. J. Riding D. Burton G. Rees M. Sharratt (1995) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Style and Personality in 12-Year-old Children’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 65 113–124
R. J. Riding I. Cheema (1991) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Styles: An Overview and Integration’ Educational Psychology 11 IssueID3 193–215
R. J. Riding J. Douglas (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Cognitive Style and Mode of Presentation on Learning Performance’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 63 297–307
R. J. Riding F. Pearson (1994) ArticleTitle‘The Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Intelligence’ Educational Psychology 16 81–106
Riding, R. J. & Rayner, S.:1998, Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies, Fulton, London.
A. Riggs (1993) ‘The Female Perspective on Technology’ J.S. Smith (Eds) Design and Technology Loughborough University Loughborough 148–150
E. M. Skaalvik R. J. Rankin (1994) ArticleTitle‘Gender Differences in Mathematics and Verbal Achievement, Self-perception and Motivation’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 64 419–428
B. Smail (1984) Girl-friendly Science: Avoiding Sex Bias in the Curriculum Longman London
M. Tennant (1988) Psychology and Adult Learning Routledge London
InstitutionalAuthorNameTeacher Training Agency (TTA) (2002) Qualifying to Teach: Professional Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and Requirements for Initial Teacher Training TTA London
L. S. Vygotsky (1962) Thought and Language Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press Cambridge, MA
H. A. Witkin P. Oltman E. Raskin S. Karp (1971) A Manual for Embedded Figures Test CA Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto
H. A. Moore C. A. Witkin P.K. Oltman D. R. Goodnough F. Friedman D. R. Owen E. Raskin (1977) ArticleTitle‘Role of the Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles in Academic Evolution: A Longitudinal Study’ Journal of Educational Psychology 69 IssueID3 197–211
K.-C. Wong R. Lam L-M. Ho (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Schooling on Gender Differences’ British Educational Research Journal 28 IssueID6 827–843 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0141192022000019080
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, S. Factors Influencing Successful Achievement in Contrasting Design and Technology Activities in Higher Education. Int J Technol Des Educ 16, 193–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-8320-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-8320-7

