Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Influencing Successful Achievement in Contrasting Design and Technology Activities in Higher Education

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between such factors as learning style, gender, prior experience, and successful achievement in contrasting modules taken by a cohort of thirty design and technology trainee teachers during their degree programme at a University in the North East of England. Achievement data were collected from three design and three electronic modules at levels 1, 2 and 3. Data concerning appropriate, previous experience before starting the course was obtained through a short questionnaire. The learning style of each member of the sample was ascertained using the Cognitive Style Analysis test. The findings from the study indicated that the learning style groupings were not as expected. A positive relationship between achievement and past experience in both electronics and design activity was found, although improvement for those with no prior experience in comparison to those with previous experience was only evident in electronics. A concern arising out of the data was the differences in terms of achievement between male and female students and also the difference in achievement when learning style and gender were scrutinised. The implications of the findings in relation to the success of the trainees as impending teachers of design and technology were discussed. The problems associated with the small cell size caused by splitting the sample by the three variables was acknowledged and a suggestion was made that further study would be required to ascertain whether the gender and learning style differences witnessed in this study would be replicated in a larger sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • F. Banks (2002) ‘Research in Design and Technology Education’ G. Owen-Jackson (Eds) Teaching Design and Technology in Secondary Schools Routledge Falmer London 299–317

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Biggs P. J. Moore (1993) The Process of Learning EditionNumber3 Prentice Hall NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Bryne (1978) Women and Education Tavistock Publications London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cassidy (2003) ‘Learning Styles: An overview of Theories, Models and Measures’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 80–102

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Coffield K. Mosely K. Ecclestone E. Hall (2003) ‘A Systematic Review of Learning Styles and Pedagogy’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L.: 1983, ‘An Organisation of Learning Style Theory and Constructs’, ERIC Document 235, 185.

  • H. G. Denton (1992) ‘The Design and Make Task (DMT): Some Reflections on Designing in Schools’ J. S. Smith (Eds) Design and Technology Loughborough University Loughborough 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Design and Technology Association (DATA): 1995, Minimum Competencies for Students to teach Design and Technology in Secondary Schools–Research Paper No. 4. DATA, Wellesbourne.

  • R. Dunn (2003) ‘The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model: Theoretical Cornerstone, Research and Practical Applications’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003-Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 181–205

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dunn K. Dunn (1993) Teaching Elementary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 3–6 Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Entwistle P. Ramsden (1983) Understanding Student Learning Croom Helm Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Evans (2003) ‘Exploring the Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Teaching Style’ S. Armstrong S. Rayner M. Graff E. Sadler-Smith C. Lashley M. Schiering E. Peterson D. Spencer (Eds) ELSIN 2003–Bridging Theory and Practice The University of Hull Hull 206–229

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gilligan (1982) In a Different Voice Harvard University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K. M. Goldstein S. Blackman (1978) Cognitive Style: Five Approaches and Relevant Research Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Harding M. Grant (1984) Girls and Technology Education Chelsea College London University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Harding (2002) ‘Gender and Design and Technology’ G. Owen-Jackson (Eds) Teaching Design and Technology in Secondary Schools Routledge Falmer London 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kelly B. Smail J. Whyte (1981) The Initial GIST Survey: Results and Implications GIST Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. A.: 1999, ‘Gender and Inquiry: an Investigation into Identifying and Defining the Role of Inquiry in Higher-order Thinking, in M. Whitehead (ed.), European Journal of Teacher Education22(1), 101–114.

  • R. Kimbell K. Stables T. Wheeler A. Wosniak V. Kelly (1991) The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology: The Final Report of the APU Design and Technology Project 1985–91 School Examination and Assessment Council/Evaluation and Monitoring Unit London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Kolb (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of learning and Development Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Lawson (1990) How Designers Think: the Design Process De-mystified EditionNumber2 Butterworth Architecture London

    Google Scholar 

  • LJ Systems, Product information [Online] Available URL: www.ljgroup.com [Accessed: 05.07.07].

  • W. J. McKeachie P. Pintrich Y.G. Lin D. Smith (1986) Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom NCRIPTAL, University of Michigan MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J.: 2002, The Reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Style Analysis Test [Online] Available URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? [Accessed: 05.07.04]..

  • J. Piaget (1936) The Origins of Intelligence in Children W. W. Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding (1991) Cognitive Style Analysis–Research Administration Learning and Training Technology Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding (1996) Learning Styles and Technology-based Training Department for Education and Science Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding (2002a) Cognitive Style Analysis–Research Administration Learning and Training Technology Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J.: 2002b, ‘On the Assessment of Cognitive Style: A Commentary on Peterson, Deary and Austin’, Personality and Individual Difference [On line] Available URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? [Accessed: 05.07.04]..

  • R. J. Riding D. Burton G. Rees M. Sharratt (1995) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Style and Personality in 12-Year-old Children’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 65 113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding I. Cheema (1991) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Styles: An Overview and Integration’ Educational Psychology 11 IssueID3 193–215

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding J. Douglas (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Cognitive Style and Mode of Presentation on Learning Performance’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 63 297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Riding F. Pearson (1994) ArticleTitle‘The Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Intelligence’ Educational Psychology 16 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J. & Rayner, S.:1998, Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies, Fulton, London.

  • A. Riggs (1993) ‘The Female Perspective on Technology’ J.S. Smith (Eds) Design and Technology Loughborough University Loughborough 148–150

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Skaalvik R. J. Rankin (1994) ArticleTitle‘Gender Differences in Mathematics and Verbal Achievement, Self-perception and Motivation’ British Journal of Educational Psychology 64 419–428

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Smail (1984) Girl-friendly Science: Avoiding Sex Bias in the Curriculum Longman London

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tennant (1988) Psychology and Adult Learning Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameTeacher Training Agency (TTA) (2002) Qualifying to Teach: Professional Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and Requirements for Initial Teacher Training TTA London

    Google Scholar 

  • L. S. Vygotsky (1962) Thought and Language Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Witkin P. Oltman E. Raskin S. Karp (1971) A Manual for Embedded Figures Test CA Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Moore C. A. Witkin P.K. Oltman D. R. Goodnough F. Friedman D. R. Owen E. Raskin (1977) ArticleTitle‘Role of the Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Styles in Academic Evolution: A Longitudinal Study’ Journal of Educational Psychology 69 IssueID3 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • K.-C. Wong R. Lam L-M. Ho (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Effect of Schooling on Gender Differences’ British Educational Research Journal 28 IssueID6 827–843 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0141192022000019080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Atkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkinson, S. Factors Influencing Successful Achievement in Contrasting Design and Technology Activities in Higher Education. Int J Technol Des Educ 16, 193–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-8320-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-8320-7

Keywords

Navigation