Abstract
Rapid social change creates a powerful challenge to individuals and educational institutions. Technology education is not an exception. To be a useful and authentic learning area, technology education should constantly re-examine its rationale in order to formulate responses to changing contexts to improve the quality of learning for students. The more perspectives used for this process, the better the results should be. This article explores several facets of social change that can influence an understanding of the aims and nature of technology education and that might contribute to its development. Social change is a very complex and dynamic phenomenon that can be considered from a variety of perspectives and is reflected in a number of processes. These processes are different in different types of societies. In relation to the topic, the following processes that are relevant to Western societies (it is acknowledged that for different type of societies, e.g. Islamic, Chinese, social context will be different) will be analyzed: (1) The shift of emphasis from engaging society members primarily as producers to engaging society members primarily as consumers; (2) The colonisation of the cognitive and moral spheres of human life by the aesthetic sphere; (3) The integration of people into the technological world and (4) The shift from the Welfare state to the Competition state. These processes have been identified on the basis of their potential influences on the development of technology education and, as a consequence, the students who study it. These processes are in tension which creates even greater challenges to technology education.
Several implications of the above analysis in terms of conceptualizing technology education are discussed. It is suggested that social change can be addressed through technology education if the educational goals of it are ‘to broaden minds and develop all pupils in the creation of a better society’. For technology education classrooms, these specifically mean the involvement of students in democratic debates on the future outlines of technological development; development of their social and ecological sensitivities; avoiding orienting their solutions exclusively to the standard of business efficiency and profitability criteria; helping them to distinguish real needs from desires; discussing the role of designed objects in the life of contemporary society; putting more emphasis on other than the aesthetic aspects of life that can provide existential meaning for people; challenging the way people are manipulated through advertising and cultivation of their desires; developing an active/creative attitude towards problems (not re-active); teaching students to formulate problems (not only being involved in problem solving); challenging consumer-oriented design; looking at design as one source of inspiration, not as a source of economic utility; and developing social responsibility
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.J. Arnett (1997) ArticleTitle‘Young People’s Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood’ Youth & Society 29 IssueID1 3–21
S.J. Ball (1994) Educational Reform: A Critical and Post Structural Approach Open University Press Buckingham
S.J. Ball (1997) ArticleTitle‘Policy Sociology and Critical Social Research: A Personal Review of Recent Education Policy and Policy Research’ British Educational Research Journal 23 IssueID3 257–274
S.J. Ball (1998) ArticleTitle‘Big Policies/Small World: An Introduction to International Perspectives in Education Policy’ Comparative education 34 IssueID2 119–130 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03050069828225
Ball S.J. (1999). ‘Performativities and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performative Society’, Keynote address to the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne 1999
M. Barnett (1992) ‘Technology, Within the National Curriculum and Elsewhere’ J. Beynon H Mackay (Eds) Technological Literacy and the Curriculum. Falmer Press London 84–104
S. Bartlett D. Burton N. Peim (2001) Introduction to Education Studies Paul Chapman Publishing, A SAGE Publications Company London
Z. Bauman (1995) Life in Fragments. Essays in Postmodern Morality Backwell Oxford
Z. Bauman (1998) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor Open University Press Buckingham
U. Beck (1994) ‘Self-Dissolution and Self-Endangerment of Industrial Society: What does this Mean?’ U. Beck A. Giddens S Lash (Eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Polity Press Cambridge 174–183
U. Beck (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order Polity Press Cambridge
G. Böhme (1992) ‘The Techno-Structures of Society’ N. Stehr R.V. Ericson (Eds) The Culture and the Power of Knowledge: Inquiries into Contemporary Societies Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York 39–50
P.G. Cerny (1997) ArticleTitle‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’ Government and opposition 32 IssueID2 251–274
InstitutionalAuthorNameCommission of the European Communities. (1993) Growth, Competitiveness, Employment The Challenges and Ways forward into the 21st Century Office for Official Publications of the European Community (Bulletin of European Communities. Supplement 1993 6) Luxemburg
R. Cowen (1996) ArticleTitle‘Editorial’ Comparative Education 32 IssueID2 149–150 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03050069628803
Curriculum Corporation. 1997. A Statement on Technology for Australian Schools, Author, Carlton, Victoria. (originally published in 1994)
R. Dale (2000) ‘Globalization: A New World for Comparative Education?’ J. Schriewer (Eds) Discourse Formation for Comparative Education. Peter Lang Frankfurt am Main 87–109
H.L. Dreyfus (1998) ArticleTitle‘Education on the Internet: Anonymity vs. Commitment’ The Internet and Higher Education 1 IssueID2 113–124 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80174-3
A. Forty (1986) Objects of Desire: Design and Society since 1750 Thames and Hudson Ltd., London
Ellul, J.: 1990, The Technological Bluff (G. W. Bromiley, Trans.), Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Original work published 1987)
A. Giddens (1994) ‘Risk, Trust, Reflexivity’ U. Beck A. Giddens S. Lash (Eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order Polity Press Cambridge 184–197
D. Giffin S. Inman J. Meadows A. Norman M. Rogers R. Wade (2001) Teaching for Sustainable Future: Embedding Sustainable Development Education in the Initial Teacher Training Curriculum The Center for Cross Curricular Initiatives London
Gottdiener, M.: 2000, ‘Approaches to Consumption: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives’, in M
Gottdiener (eds). New Forms of Consumption: Consumers, Culture, and Commodification. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Boston, pp. 3–31
Habermas, J.: 1971, Toward a Rational Society (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.), Heinemann, London. (Original work published 1968)
J. Habermas (1981) ArticleTitle‘Modernity Versus Postmodernity’ New German Critique 22 3–14
J. Habermas (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment Re-reading Dialectic of Enlightenment’ New German critique 26 13–30
D. Hartley (1997) Re-schooling Society Falmer Press London
International Technology Education Association: 1996, Technology for All Americans. A Rational and Structure for the study of Technology, Author, Reston, Virginia
S. Keirl (2002) ‘A Moment in Design and Technology Curriculum Development as a Component of Educational Reform’ M. Pavlova M. Gurevich (Eds) Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for Technology Education in the Context of Globalization, National Technology Education Center Nizhny Novgorod Russia 153–167
S. Lash (2001) ArticleTitle‘Technological Forms of Life’ Theory, Culture & Society 18 IssueID1 105–120
J-F. Lyotard (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G Bennington and B Massumi, trans, foreword by F Jameson) Manchester University Press Manchester
H. Mackay (1991) ‘Technology as an Educational issue: Social and Political Perspectives’ H. Mackay J YoungM.& Beynon (Eds) Understanding Technology in Education. The Falmer Press London 1–12
S. Marginson (1993) Education and Public Policy in Australia Cambridge University Press Cambridge
S. McLaren (1997) ArticleTitle‘Value Judgements: Evaluating Design – A Scottish Perspective on a Global Issue’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3 IssueID3 259–278 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008825219627
C. Miller J. Pitt (2000) Live Well, Live Wisely! Technology for Sustainable Development Intermediate Technology Publications London
Ministère de l’èducation nationale: 1996, La technologie au college, The Author, Paris. Morakhovski, D. & Pavlova, M.: 2002, ‘Russian Educational Reform: A Vision of the National Imaginary in the Context of Globalization’, Paper Presented at the XV World Congress of Sociology, Brisbane, July 7–13, 2002
National Curriculum: 2002, Design and technology, Retrieved from the web http://www.nc.uk.net/
M.H. O’Neill (1995) ‘Introduction’ D.S.G. Carter M.H. O’Neill (Eds) International Perspectives on Educational Reform and Policy Implementation. Falmer Press London 1–11
M. Pavlova (2002) ‘Teaching Values in Technology Education: A Critical Approach for the Theoretical Framework’ H. Middleton M. Pavlova D Roebuck (Eds) Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century. Griffith University Brisbane 96–102
Pavlova, M: 2004, ‘Sustainability: Towards Systematic Approach for its Conceptualisation in Technology Education’, Paper for the international conference on Purposes and assessments within technology education, Paris, March 2004 http://membres.lycos.fr/aeet/
M. Pavlova H. Middleton (2002) ‘Values in Technology Education: A Two-country Study’ H. Middleton M. Pavlova D Roebuck (Eds) Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century. Griffith University Brisbane 103–113
S. Petrina (2000) ArticleTitle‘ The Political Ecology of Design and Technology Education: An Inquiry into Methods’ International Journal of Technology and Design education 10 207–237 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008955016067
R. Putnam (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
S. Riddell S. Baron A. Wilson (2001) The Learning Society and People with Learning Difficulties The Policy Press Bristol
J. Rifkin (1995) The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era Ajeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam Book New York, NY
H. Shore (1985) ‘Culture, Development and Human Values’ E. László I Vitányi (Eds) European Culture and World Development. UNESCO Joint Studies for the European Cultural Forum. Pergamon Press Oxford 35–53
S. Taylor F. Rizvi B. Lingard M. Henry (1997) Educational Policy and the Politics of Change Routledge London and New York
J. Wajcman (1995) ‘Feminist Theories of Technology’ S. Jasanoff G.E. Markle J.C. Petersen T Pinch (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, SAGE. Thousand Oaks CA 189–204
Wicklein R. (ed.): 2001, Appropriate Technology for Sustainable Living, 50th Yearbook of the Council on Technology Teacher education, ITEA, VA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavlova, M. Social Change: How Should Technology Education Respond?. Int J Technol Des Educ 15, 199–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-5867-2
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-5867-2