Abstract
In the same vein as Blanchard and Tirole (J Eur Econ Assoc 6:45–77, 2008) First Pass, this note shows that, under the condition for equilibrium stability, the partial implementation of layoff taxes invariably increases firms’ profits as well as workers’ utilities by lowering payroll taxes. It also proves that, due to multiple equilibria, requiring stability does not raise any equilibrium existence issue per se. These insights could favor the introduction of firing taxes, which in practice would probably be a gradual process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
BT explain why this private system is not viable.
See (WP) for detailed derivations.
In France, the general exemptions from social contributions (Fillon reform) were implemented in stages, for>2 years. The same holds for the reduction in working hours, “35 heures.”
References
Anderson, P., & Meyer, B. (1993). Unemployment insurance in the United States: Layoff incentives and cross subsidies. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(2), 70–95.
Blanchard, O. J., & Tirole, J. (2008). The joint design of unemployment insurance and employment protection: A first pass. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1), 45–77.
Cahuc, P., & Malherbet, F. (2004). Unemployment compensation finance and labor market rigidity. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3–4), 481–501.
Gavrel, F. (2017). The Magic of Layoff Taxes Requires Equilibrium Stability. Working paper, CREM, University of Caen Normandy and CNRS. May 2017, revised version. Available on the website IDEAS.
L’Haridon, O., & Malherbet, F. (2009). Employment protection reform in search economies. European Economic Review, 53(3), 255–273.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Olivier Blanchard for his comments. I am also indebted to Yannick L’Horty, Yves Zénou and the Editor, Kimberley Scharf, for their helpful suggestions. The usual caveat applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gavrel, F. The magic of layoff taxes requires equilibrium stability. Int Tax Public Finance 25, 404–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9459-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9459-y