The incidence of Cash for Clunkers: Evidence from the 2009 car scrappage scheme in Germany
- 371 Downloads
This paper investigates the German car scrappage program, focusing on the incidence of the premium. We ask how much of the €2500 ($3500) buyer subsidy is actually captured by the demand side. More precisely, we analyze the program’s impact on different car segments, allowing for heterogeneity in incidence at different points in the vehicle price distribution. Using a unique microtransaction data set, we find that the incidence of the subsidy strongly and significantly varies across price segments. Subsidized buyers of cheap cars paid a little more than comparable buyers who did not receive the subsidy, indicating incidence amounts slightly below 100 %. For more expensive vehicles, subsidized buyers were granted large extra discounts on top of the government premium, translating into incidence amounts considerably greater than 100 %. Taken together, this results in an aggregate incidence amount of up to plus €350 million, suggesting that the positive effect for expensive cars overcompensates the negative effect for small cars.
KeywordsCash for Clunkers Scrappage scheme Incidence Subsidy Pricing
JEL ClassificationH22 D12 L62
The authors are grateful for valuable remarks from the Editor, Ron Davies, and two anonymous referees. Moreover, we thank Martin Becker, Nadja Dwenger, Marc Escrihuela Villar, Paul Grieco, Rainer Haselmann, Stefan Klößner, Dieter Schmidtchen, and Michael Wolf. Also, we are thankful for inputs from the participants of the EEA Conference, the IIOC, the Applied Micro Seminar at Penn State, the ACDD Conference, the Econometric Society Australasian Meeting, the Warsaw International Economic Meeting, the Annual Meeting of the German Economic Association, and the IIPF Conference.
- Aldy, J., Houde, S., & Nazar, H. (2013). Did the stimulus benefit the environment? New evidence from cash for appliances. Working paper.Google Scholar
- BAFA. (2010). Abschlussbericht–Umweltprämie. Accessed on March 24, 2015 from http://www.bafa.de/bafa/de/wirtschaftsfoerderung/umweltpraemie/publikationen/ump_abschlussbericht.pdf.
- Busse, M. R., Knittel, C. R., Silva-Risso, J., & Zettelmeyer, F. (2012). Did ’Cash for Clunkers’ deliver? The consumer effects of the car allowance rebate system. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Evans, W. N., Ringel, J. S., & Stech, D. (1999). Tobacco taxes and public policy to discourage smoking. In Tax policy and the economy, Vol. 13 of NBER chapters (pp. 1–56). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
- Friedman, J. (2009). The incidence of the medicare prescription drug benefit: Using asset prices to assess its impact on drug makers. Working paper, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. E. (2002). Tax incidence. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1787–1872). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Gneezy, U., List, J., & Price, M. K. (2012). Toward an understanding of why people discriminate: Evidence from a series of natural field experiments. Working paper 17855, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Hastings, J., & Washington, E. (2010). The first of the month effect: Consumer behavior and store responses. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(2), 142–162.Google Scholar
- Klößner, S., & Pfeifer, G. (2015). Synthesizing Cash for Clunkers: Stabilizing the car market, hurting the environment. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Knittel, C. R. (2009). The implied cost of carbon dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers program. Working Paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Kotlikoff, L. J., & Summers, L. H. (1987). Tax incidence. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 2, pp. 1043–1092). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Licandro, O., & Sampayo, A. R. (2006). The effects of replacement schemes on car sales: The Spanish case. Investigaciones Economicas, 30(2), 239–282.Google Scholar
- Rothstein, J. (2010). Is the EITC as good as an NIT? Conditional cash transfers and tax incidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 177–208.Google Scholar
- Sallee, J. M. (2011). The surprising incidence of tax credits for the Toyota Prius. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 189–219.Google Scholar