Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 777–810 | Cite as

Tax rate and tax base competition for foreign direct investment

  • Peter Egger
  • Horst RaffEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper examines empirically whether governments behave strategically when setting corporate tax rates and tax bases, and—if so—how they react to changes in other countries’ tax rates and bases. Specifically, we estimate the slopes of tax policy reaction functions and examine how marginal changes in trade costs and GDP affect tax policies in the Nash equilibrium. The estimated slopes and comparative static effects can be rationalized in a model in which governments compete for foreign direct investment (FDI). Using estimated policy reaction functions, we demonstrate that observed changes in corporate tax systems are consistent with tougher competition for FDI following regional trade integration.

Keywords

Corporate taxes Tax competition Foreign direct investment Multinational firms Free-trade areas Regional integration 

JEL classification

F15 F23 H20 H25 

References

  1. Bauer, C., Davies, R. B., & Haufler, A. (2011). Economic integration and the optimal corporate tax structure with heterogeneous firms. Working Papers 201115, School Of Economics, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, J., & Fuest, C. (2011). Optimal tax policy when firms are internationally mobile. International Tax and Public Finance, 18, 580–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorvatn, K., & Eckel, C. (2006). Policy competition for foreign direct investment between asymmetric countries. European Economic Review, 50, 1891–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, E. W., & Samuelson, L. (1988). Bargaining with commitment, choice of techniques and direct foreign investment. Journal of International Economics, 26, 257–279.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, D., Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. (2001). Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 91, 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crabbé, K., & Vandenbussche, H. (2009). Are your firm’s taxes set in Warsaw? Spatial tax competition in Europe. CEPR Discussion Papers 7159.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, R. B., & Ellis, C. J. (2007). Competition in taxes and performance requirements for foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 51, 1423–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, R. B., & Eckel, C. (2010). Tax competition for heterogeneous firms with endogenous entry. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 77–102.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, R. B., & Voget, J. (2010). Tax competition in an expanding European Union. GEE Papers 33.Google Scholar
  10. Devereux, M. P., & Griffith, R. (1998). The taxation of discrete investment choices. Mimeo, Institute for Fiscal Studies. Working Papers W98/16.Google Scholar
  11. Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2002). Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition. Economic Policy, 17, 451–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1210–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doyle, C., & van Wijnbergen, S. (1994). Taxation of foreign multinationals: A sequential bargaining approach to tax holidays. International Tax and Public Finance, 1, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egger, P., Loretz, S., Pfaffermayr, M., & Winner, H. (2009). Corporate taxation and multinational activity. Revised version of CESifo Working Paper 1773.Google Scholar
  16. Fuest, C., Huber, B., & Mintz, J. (2005). Capital mobility and tax competition: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 1, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garretsen, H., & Peeters, J. (2007). Capital mobility, agglomeration and corporate tax rates: Is the race to the bottom for real? CESifo Economic Studies, 53, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haufler, A., & Schjelderup, G. (2000). Corporate tax systems and cross-country profit shifting. Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 300–325.Google Scholar
  19. Haufler, A., & Stähler, F. (2013). Tax competition in a simple model with heterogeneous firms: How larger markets reduce profit taxes. International Economic Review, 54, 665–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haufler, A., & Wooton, I. (1999). Country size and tax competition for foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 71, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haufler, A., & Wooton, I. (2010). Competition for firms in an oligopolistic industry: The impact of economic integration. Journal of International Economics, 80, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janeba, E. (1996). Foreign direct investment under oligopoly: Profit shifting or profit capturing? Journal of Public Economics, 60, 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (1999). A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review, 40, 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelejian, H. H., Prucha, I. R., & Yuzefovich, Y. (2004). Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances: Large and small sample results. In J. LeSage & R. K. Pace (Eds.), Advances in Econometrics (pp. 163–198). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. King, M. A., & Fullerton, D. (1984). The taxation of income from capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klemm, A., & Parys, S. (2012). Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives. International Tax and Public Finance, 19, 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krautheim, S., & Schmidt-Eisenlohr, T. (2011). Heterogeneous firms, ‘profit shifting’ FDI and international tax competition. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. (2002). Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Review of International Economics, 10, 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Overesch, M., & Rinke, J. (2011). What drives tax rates down? A reassessment of globalization, tax competition, and dynamic adjustment to shocks. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 579–602.Google Scholar
  32. Osmundsen, P., Hagen, K. P., & Schjelderup, G. (1998). Internationally mobile firms and tax policy. Journal of International Economics, 45, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raff, H. (2004). Preferential trade agreements and tax competition for foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2745–2763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kiel University and Kiel Institute for the World EconomyKielGermany
  2. 2.ETH ZürichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations