International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1028–1050 | Cite as

Revenue and welfare effects of financial sector VAT exemption

  • Thiess Buettner
  • Katharina Erbe
Policy Watch


This paper provides an analysis of revenue and welfare effects associated with a VAT exemption of financial services, which is common among OECD countries. We follow a general equilibrium approach that considers effects of repealing the VAT exemption not only on consumer demand and intermediate-input demand for financial services, but takes account also of the VAT distortion of labor supply. We derive formal expressions for revenue and welfare effects, which can be quantified with a minimum of information about behavioral effects. Using VAT statistics as well as national accounts, we provide quantitative estimates of the effects of repealing the VAT exemption in Germany. Our baseline estimate indicates that tax revenues would increase by some €1.7 billion or 1.3 % of VAT revenues (excluding import turnover tax). Provided these revenue gains are used to finance a reduction in the VAT rate or in other distortive labor taxes our results indicate a modest welfare gain of about €1 billion, or 0.04 % of GDP.


VAT Financial services Exemption General equilibrium Deadweight loss Input-output analysis 

JEL Classification

H24 H25 


  1. Auerbach, A. J., & Gordon, R. H. (2002). Taxation of financial services under a VAT. The American Economic Review, 92(2), 411–416. Papers and proceedings of the one Hundred fourteenth annual meeting of the American Economic Association. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, D. (1999). World consumption economics. Singapore: World Scientific. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De la Feria, R., & Lockwood, B. (2010). Opting for opting-in? An evaluation of the European commission’s proposals for reforming VAT on financial services. Fiscal Studies 31(2), 171–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Genser, B., & Winker, P. (1997). Measuring the fiscal revenue loss of VAT exemption in commercial banking. Finanzarchiv, 54, 563–585. Google Scholar
  5. Goulder, L. H., & Williams, R. C. (2003). The substantial bias from ignoring general equilibrium effects in estimating excess burden, and a practical solution. Journal of Political Economy, 111(4), 898–927. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grubert, H., & Mackie, J. (1999). Must financial services be taxed under a consumption tax? National Tax Journal, 53, 23–40. Google Scholar
  7. Hines, J. R. Jr. (1999). Three sides of Harberger triangles. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 167–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huizinga, H. (2002). A European VAT on financial services? Economic Policy, 17(35), 497–534. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. International Monetary Fund (2010). A fair and substantial contribution by the financial sector: final report for the G-20.
  10. Keane, M. P. (2011). Labor supply and taxes: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 961–1075. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lockwood, B. (2011). Estimates from national accounts data of the revenue effect of imposing VAT on currently exempt sales of financial services companies in the EU. In How the EU VAT exemptions impact the banking sector. PWC-Study. Google Scholar
  12. Lockwood, B. (2012). How should financial intermediation services be taxed? Mimeo. Google Scholar
  13. Mirrlees, J., et al. (2011). Mirrlees review—tax by design.
  14. OECD (2008). Taxing wages 2006/2007. Paris. Google Scholar
  15. Statistisches Bundesamt (2009). Umsatzsteuerstatistik 2007, Tabelle 2.3 der Jahrespublikation, Fachserie 14 Reihe 8 (ohne innergemeinschaftliche Erwerbe). Wiesbaden. Google Scholar
  16. Statistisches Bundesamt (2010). Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen, Input-Output-Rechnung 2007, Fachserie 18 Reihe 2. Wiesbaden. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Erlangen–NurembergNurembergGermany

Personalised recommendations