Skip to main content
Log in

The political economy of tax projections

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the political economy of tax projections. It argues that governments face incentives to present upward biased tax projections. In election years, this may help them to increase the chance of reelection. If this chance is low, biased tax projections help governments to bring forward favorable expenditures and to burden their successors. These hypotheses are tested using West German states between 1992 and 2002. While there is only weak support for a general upward bias in tax projection and the importance of elections and partisanship, the degree of overestimation is found to be significantly higher, the less popular the incumbent party is and the poorer the state-specific economic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process. American Economic Review, 86(2), 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2006). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50, 1403–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J. (1996). Dynamic revenue estimation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J. (1999). On the performance and use of government revenue forecasts. National Tax Journal, 52, 762–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. C. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 769–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, I. (2005). Electoral competition in a multidimensional political arena—parallel moves instead of convergence in policy platforms. Public Choice, 122, 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brück, T., & Stephan, A. (2006). Do Eurozone countries cheat with their budget deficit forecasts? Kyklos, 59, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2007). Arbeitskreis “Steuerschätzungen”. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_2144/DE/Wirtschaft_und_Verwaltung/Steuern/Steuerschaetzung_einnahmen/Grundlagen/2294_en.html. Accessed 6 September 2007.

  • Burkhart, S. (2004). Parteipolitikverflechtung: Der Einfluss der Bundespolitik auf Landtagswahlentscheidungen von 1976 bis 2002. MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/1 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln.

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2005). Defizitbegrenzende Haushaltsregeln und nationaler Stabilitätspakt in Deutschland (pp. 23–32). Monatsbericht April 2005.

  • Franzese, R. J. (2002). Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 369–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1982). How powerful are public bureaucrats as voters? Public Choice, 38, 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, E., & Rossi, S. P. S. (2002). Political business cycles: the case of the Western German Länder. Public Choice, 110, 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandenberger, O. (2004). Supranationale Regeln zur Sicherung finanzpolitischer Disziplin. In G. Milbrat & I. Deubel (Eds.), Ordnungspolitische Beiträge zur Finanz- und Wirtschaftspolitik (pp. 45–64). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, H. (2001). Methoden, Probleme und Ergebnisse der Steuerschätzung. RWI-Mitteilungen, 52, 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. J. (1994). A political theory in intergovernmental grants. Public Choice, 78(3–4), 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1996). Electoral competition and special interest politics. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, F. (2006). Planning or propaganda? An evaluation of Germany’s medium-term budgetary planning. Finanzarchiv, 62, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W., & Winer, S. L. (1997). The political economy of taxation. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice (pp. 481–505). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, LXXI, 1467–1487.

  • Huber, G., Kocher, M., & Sutter, M. (2003). Government strength, power dispersion in goverments and budget deficits in OECD-countries. A voting power approach. Public Choice, 116, 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, G. (2002). Perspektiven für eine wirksamere öffentliche Finanzkontrolle. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 55, 600–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab, R. M., Rider, M., & Wall, K. D. (2007). Are errors in official US budget receipts forecasts just noise? Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper 07-22.

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannenstad, P., & Paldam, M. (1994). The V-P function—a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice, 79(3–4), 213–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Svensson, L. E. O. (1989). Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: policy with time-inconsistent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1997). Political economy and macroeconomic policy. NBER Working Paper no. 6329.

  • Pettersson-Lidblom, P. (2001). An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 570–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potters, J., & Sloof, R. (1996). Interest groups: a survey of empirical models that try to assess their influence. European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 403–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in industrialized democracies. European Economic Review, 33, 903–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Steikow, R. (1996). Finanzplanung von Bund und Ländern 1995 bis 1999. Wirtschaft und Statistik, 2, 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, H. (2000). Fiscal policy, deficits and politics of subnational governments: The case of the German Laender. Public Choice, 102, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, M. (2003). The political economy of fiscal policy: an experimental study on the strategic use of deficits. Public Choice, 116, 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G., & Alesina, A. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review, 80, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen, H. P., & Swank, O. H. (1996). Government spending cycles: ideological or opportunistic. Public Choice, 89, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkerink, B., & de Haan, J. (2001). Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: new evidence. Public Choice, 109, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Lippe, P. (1986). Steuerschätzungen und ihre wirtschaftspolitische Bedeutung. Steuer und Studium Heft, 11, 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Lippe, P. (1998). Steuerschätzung: Probleme, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Steuern und Studium Heft, 5, 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen, J., & Harden, I. (1994). National budget processes and fiscal performance in the European Communities. European Economy, Reports and Studies, 3, 311–418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Bischoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bischoff, I., Gohout, W. The political economy of tax projections. Int Tax Public Finance 17, 133–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9103-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9103-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation