Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal income taxation and social norms in the labor market

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns optimal income taxation in a two-type model extended to allow for social interaction and social norms in the labor market. One norm refers to “normal behavior” with respect to work hours (the hours of work norm), whereas another means that “one should earn one’s living by working” (the participation norm). The results show how the hours of work norm gives rise to a corrective motive for using income taxation. We also show how the interaction between the hours of work norm and the private incentive to participate in the labor market (which reflects the participation norm) gives rise to an employment motive for using the income tax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, A. B. (2005). Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. (1980). A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 749–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., & Sjögren, T. (2003). Income taxation, commodity taxation and provision of public goods under labor market imperfections. Finanzarchiv, 59, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., & Sjögren, T. (2004). Is the optimal labor income tax progressive in a unionized economy? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 661–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). When the Joneses’ consumption hurts: optimal public good provision and nonlinear income taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 986–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, T., Blomquist, S., & Sacklen, H. (1999). How to identify interdependent behaviour in an empirical model of labor supply. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 607–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 841–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, S. (1993). Interdependent behavior and the effect of taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 51, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, M. J., & Sheshinski, E. (1978). Individual welfare depends upon relative income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2000). Reciprocity, self-interest and the welfare state. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruvoll, A., & Nyborg, K. (2004). The cold shiver of not giving enough: On the social costs of recycling campaigns. Land Economics, 80, 540–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2007). Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica, 74, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: endogenous goals and reference standards. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuest, C., & Huber, B. (1997). Wage bargaining, labor-tax progression, and welfare. Journal of Economics, 66, 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B. (2006). Optimal environmental taxation under relative consumption effects. Ecological Economics, 58, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakee, K., & Sun, G.-Z. (2005). External habit formation and dependency in the welfare state. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (1995). Welfare state disincentives with endogenous habits and norms. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., & Weibull, J. (1999). Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., & Weibull, J. (2003). Social norms and welfare state dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 533–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, M. (1995). Why are taxes so high in egalitarian societies? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. H. (1982). Optimum taxation with errors in administration. Journal of Public Economics, 17, 181–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1982). Self-selection and Pareto efficient taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 17, 213–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendner, R. (2005). Frames of reference, the environment and efficient taxation. Economics of Governance, 6, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woittiez, I., & Kapteyn, A. (1998). Social interaction and habit formation in a model of female labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Aronsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronsson, T., Sjögren, T. Optimal income taxation and social norms in the labor market. Int Tax Public Finance 17, 67–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9100-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9100-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation