Skip to main content
Log in

Tax credits, income support, and partnership decisions

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the potential impact of welfare benefits on the partnership status of women in the UK. Using recent policy reforms to identify the response rate, it was found that a £100/week welfare benefit “partnership penalty” reduces the probability of a woman having a partner by seven percentage points. The model is also used to explore the potential effects of the recent tax credit reforms on partnership rates; it was found that while the 1999 WFTC reform improved partnership incentives, this effect was effectively undone by the 2003 WTC/CTC reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baughman, R., & Dickert-Conlin, S. (2003). Did expanding the EITC promote motherhood? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 93, 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B., Hoynes, H. W., & Zavodny, M. (2004). The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography, 41, 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R. (2002). Welfare-to-work: Which policies work and why? In Keynes Lecture in Economics: Vol. 117. British Academy Proceedings (pp. 477–524).

  • Blundell, R., Duncan, A., McCrae, J., & Meghir, C. (2000). The labour market impact of the working families’ tax credit. Fiscal Studies, 21, 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Hoynes, H. (2004). Has in-work benefit reform helped the labour market? In D. Card, R. Blundell, & R. Freeman (Eds.), Seeking a premier league economy (pp. 411–460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chap. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Duncan, A., Shephard, A., & Suarez, M. J. (2007). Did working families tax credit work? Analysing the impact of in-work support on labour supply and programme participation. Labour Economics, 13, 699–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., & Shaw, J. (2006). How many lone parents are receiving tax credits? Institute for Fiscal Studies, Briefing Note No. 70.

  • Brien, M. J., Lillard, L. A., & Stern, S. N. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage and divorce in a model of match-quality. International Economic Review, 47, 451–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickert-Conlin, S., & Houser, S. (1999). EITC, AFDC, and the female headship decision. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper no. 1192-99.

  • Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. (2000). Tax and transfer policy, and family formation: Marriage and cohabitation. Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. W. (2003). Good news for low income families? Tax transfer schemes and marriage. Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Ellwood, D. T. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal, 53, 1063–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francesconi, M., & van der Klaauw, W. (2007). The socioeconomic consequences of “in-work” benefit reform for British lone mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, L. (2007). The effect of benefits on single motherhood in Europe: Evidence from the ECHP. Labour Economics, 14, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, P., & Harkness, S. (2003). Welfare reform and lone parents employment in the UK. In R. Dickens, P. Gregg, & J. Wadsworth (Eds.), The labour market under labour: State of working Britain 2003. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. J., & Scholz, J. K. (2003). The earned income tax credit. In R. Moffitt (Ed.), Means-tested transfer programs in the US (pp. 141–197). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes, H. W. (1997). Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? Journal of Public Economics, 65, 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-J. (2005). Micro-econometrics for policy, program, and treatment effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1992). Incentive effects of the US welfare system: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1994). Welfare effects on female headship with area effects. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and the family. In R. Moffitt (Ed.), Welfare and family and reproductive behavior. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. (1999). Welfare, marital prospects, and nonmarital childbearing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, S3–S22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeni, R. F. Blank, R.M. (2000). What has welfare reform accomplished? Impacts on welfare participation, employment, income, poverty, and family structure. NBER Working Paper No. 7627.

  • Van der Klaauw, W. (1996). Female labour supply and marital status decisions: A life-cycle model. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 199–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2006). Child support and partnership dissolution. Economic Journal, 106, C93–C116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Anderberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderberg, D. Tax credits, income support, and partnership decisions. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 499–526 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9078-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9078-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation