Abstract
A methodology for measuring the user cost of intangible R&D capital is developed. In contrast to the way in which the Hall–Jorgenson–King–Fullerton (HJKF) approach to measuring the user cost of capital, and the related notion of the effective marginal tax rate on capital, is typically applied to intangible R&D capital, the methodology takes explicit account of the microeconomic foundations of R&D in order to aggregate the user costs of the various inputs used in the production of R&D. Illustrative calculations are presented for Canadian provinces which show that relative to the methodology developed here, the standard approach substantially overstates the tax subsidy offered to intangible R&D capital.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ambec, S., & Poitevin, J. (2001). Organizational design of R&D activities. CIRANO Working Paper 2001s38.
Auerbach, A. (2002). Taxation and corporate financial policy. In A. Auerbach, & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1251–1292). New York: North-Holland.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bernstein, J. (1986). The effect of direct and indirect tax incentives on Canadian industrial R&D expenditures. Canadian Public Policy, 12(3), 438–448.
Bernstein, J. (1996). R&D spillovers between U.S. and Canadian industries. Canadian Journal of Economics, Special Issue, Part 2, S463–S467.
Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credits work: evidence from an international panel of countries 1979–97. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31.
Boadway, R., Bruce, N., & Mintz, J. (1984). Taxation, inflation and the effective marginal tax rate on capital. Canadian Journal of Economics, 17, 62–79.
Dahlby, B. (1996). Taxation and social insurance. In R. Bird, & J. Mintz (Eds.), Taxation to 2000 and beyond, Canadian tax paper No. 93. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Department of Finance, Canada. (1998). The federal system of income tax incentives for scientific research and experimental development, evaluation report. Ottawa, Ontario; Available on October 25, 2006 at http://www.fin.gc.ca/toce/1998/resdev_e.html.
Gordon, K., & Tchilinguirian, H. (1998). Marginal effective tax rates on physical, human and R&D capital. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 199.
Griffith, R., Sandler, D., & Van Reenen, J. (1995). Tax incentives for R&D. Fiscal Studies, 16(2), 21–44.
Griliches, Z. (1988). Productivity puzzles and R&D: another nonexplanation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 9–21.
Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(Supplement), 29–47.
Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hall, B. H. (1993). R&D tax policy during the eighties: success or failure. Tax Policy and the Economy, 7, 1–36.
Hines, J. R. (1993). On the sensitivity of r&d to delicate tax changes: the behavior of U.S. multinationals in the 1980s. In A. Giovannini, R. G. Hubbard, & J. Slemrod (Eds.), Studies in international taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hall, R. E., & Jorgenson, D. (1967). Tax policy and investment behavior. American Economic Review, 57(3), 391–414.
King, M., & Fullerton, D. (1984). The taxation of income from capital: a comparative study of the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden and West Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mackie, J. (2002). Unfinished business of the 1986 tax reform: an effective tax rate analysis of current issues in the taxation of capital income. National Tax Journal, 55, 293–337.
McKenzie, K. J. (1994). The implications of risk and irreversibility for the measurement of marginal effective tax rates on capital. Canadian Journal of Economics, 27(3), 604–619.
McKenzie, K. J., Mintz, J. M., & Scharf, K. A. (1997). Measuring effective tax rates in the presence of multiple inputs: a production based approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 4(3), 332–359.
Nadari, M., & Prucha, I. (1993). Estimation of the depreciation rate of physical and R&D capital in the U.S. total manufacturing industries. NBER Working Paper 4591.
Poterba, J., & Summers, L. (1985). The economic effects of dividend taxation. In E. Altman, & M. Subrahmanyam (Eds.), Recent advances in corporate finance. Homewood: Dow-Jones Irwin.
Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.
Wilson, D. (2005). Beggar thy neighbor?: the in-state vs. out-of-state impact of state R&D tax credits. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2005-08.
Zodrow, G. (1991). On the ‘traditional’ and ‘new’ views of dividend taxation. National Tax Journal, 44, 497–509.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenzie, K.J. Measuring tax incentives for R&D. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 563–581 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9039-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9039-7
Keywords
- Research and development
- Technological change
- Tax incentives
- Cost of capital
- Effective marginal tax rate