Skip to main content
Log in

A Note on Intertemporal Fiscal Competition and Redistribution

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies fiscal competition among jurisdictions in a dynamic framework, where the degree of mobility of private capital across jurisdictions boundaries is perfect. The optimal tax on mobile capital is a source tax that taxes away factor rents. Further we show that taxation of mobile capital can redistribute income in favor of the immobile factor labor. This is because the factor rents generated by public inputs and appropriated by mobile capital exceed the efficient level of public expenditure for investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill.

  • Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998). “Two Games of Interjurisdictional Competition when Local Governments Provide Industrial Public Goods,” International Tax and Public Finance 5, 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feehan, P. (1989). “Pareto-Efficiency with Three Varieties of Public Input,” Public Finance 44, 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. I. and D. P. Hewitt. (1987). “Decentralized Tax Competition for Business Capital and National Economic Efficiency,” Journal of Regional Science 27, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. M. (1994). “Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay,” Journal of Economic Literature 32, 1176–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. J. and M. Marchand. (1997). “Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending,” Journal of Public Economics 66, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. and J. D. Wilson. (1997). “Capital Mobility and Environmental Standards: Racing to the Bottom with Multiple Tax Instruments,” Japan and the World Economy 9, 537–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, M. (1998). “A Note on Tax Competition and Public Input Provision,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 28, 465–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, M. (2000). “A Tax Competition Analysis of Congestible Public Inputs,” Journal of Urban Economics 48, 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. (1952). “External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation,” Economic Journal 62, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noiset, L. (1995). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods: Comment,” Journal of Urban Economics 38, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noiset, L. and W. H. Oakland. (1995). “The Taxation of Mobile Capital by Central Cities,” Journal of Public Economics 57, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999). “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism,” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1120–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. and R. M. Schwab. (1991). “The Allocative and Distributive Implications of Local Fiscal Competition.” In Kenyon, Daphne A. and Albert Breton (eds.), Competition Among State and Local Governments. Washington D.C., 127–145.

  • Reiter, M. and A. J. Weichenrieder. (1997). “Are Public Goods Public? A Critical Survey of the Demand Estimates for Local Public Services,” Finanzarchiv 54, 374–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, W. F. (1994). “The Efficient Allocation of Local Public Factors in Tiebout's Tradition,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, W. F. and D. Wellisch. (1996). “The Provision of Local Public Goods and Factors in the Presence of Firm and Household Mobility,” Journal of Public Economics 60, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1997). “The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition,” Journal of Public Economics 66, 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. (1992). “Infrastructural Competition Among Jurisdictions,” Journal of Public Economics 49, 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, D. (1995). Dezentrale Finanzpolitik bei hoher Mobilität. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, D. (2000). Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State. Cambridge University Press.

  • Wildasin, D. E. (2000). “Factor Mobility and Fiscal Policy in the EU: Policy Issues and Analytical Approaches,” Economic policy: A European Forum October, 337–368.

  • Wildasin, D. E. (2003). “Fiscal Competition in Space and Time,” Journal of Public Economics 87, 2571–2588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. and J. D. Wilson. (1996). “Imperfect Mobility of Local Government Behavior in an Overlapping-Generations Model,” Journal of Public Economics 60, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. and J. D. Wilson. (2004). “Capital Tax Competition: Bane or Boon?” Journal of Public Economics 88, 1065–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1996). “The Tax Treatment of Imperfectly Mobile Firms: Rent Seeking, Rent Protection, and Rent Destruction,” In R. C. Feenstra, Gene M. Grossman, and Douglas A. Irvin (eds.), The Political Economy of Trade: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R. (2001). “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views,” National Tax Journal 54, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R. and P. M. Mieszkowski. (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Under-Provision of Local Public Goods,” Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kersten Kellermann.

Additional information

JEL Code: H21, H23, H42, H71

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kellermann, K. A Note on Intertemporal Fiscal Competition and Redistribution. Int Tax Public Finan 13, 151–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-2462-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-2462-3

Keywords

Navigation