Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public Investment Criteria in Overlapping Generations Models of Open Economies

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper derives criteria for worthwhile public investment in an overlapping generations model of an “almost small” open economy- an economy with access to external funding at a given interest rate, but with some influence over its temporal terms of trade. If the economy is dynamically efficient (i.e. the interest rate exceeds the growth rate), committed to free trade, public investment is debt financed and lump sum taxes are feasible, two results follow. First, the “social opportunity cost of public funds” will exceed the government's borrowing rate because of the adverse effect of government borrowing on the terms of trade. Second, the marginal rate of return on worthwhile public investment will be greater than the social opportunity cost of public funds if public and private investment are complements (substitutes) and the tax on capital is below (above) the rate that minimizes the steady state burden of servicing the debt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, A. B., G. N. Mankiw, L. H. Summers and R. J. Zeckhauser. (1989). “Assessing Dynamic Efficiency.” Review of Economic Studies 56, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. and U. Kohli. (1979). “Canada-United States Trade: Tests for the Small Open Economy Hypothesis.” Canadian Journal of Economics 12, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. A. (1969). “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” I.M.F. Staff Papers 16, 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. and M. Kurz. (1970). Public Investment, The Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy. Baltimore, USA: Resources for the Future, Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1982). “The Rate of Discount on Public Investment with Imperfect Capital Markets.” In R. C. Lind (ed.), Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Baltimore, USA: Resources for the Future, Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. and J. E. Stiglitz. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1970). “Optimal Investment, Trade and Borrowing in an Open Economy.” Ch.6. In P. K. Bardhan (ed.), Economic Growth, Development and Foreign Trade. N.Y.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1968). “On the Social Rate of Discount.” American Economic Review 58, 788–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W. H. (1981). “Time Preference and International Lending and Borrowing in an Overlapping Generations Model.” Journal of Political Economy 89, 769–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D. F. (1974). “Production Theory and the Derived Demand for Imports.” Journal of International Economics 4, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D. F. (1996). “Fiscal Deficits and Intergenerational Welfare in Almost Small Open Economies.” Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 885–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D. F. (1988). “Complementarity and the Discount Rate for Public Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. (1965). “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model.” American Economic Review 55, 1126–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (1986). “Country Risk, Foreign Borrowing, and the Social Discount Rate in an Open Developing Economy.” Journal of International Money and Finance 15, S79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H., J. B. Shoven and J. Whalley. (1983). “Domestic Tax Policy and the Foreign Sector.” In M. Feldstein (ed.), Behavioural Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis. Chicago: NBER, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. C. (1972). “On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Public Funds.” In Proceedings of the Committee on Water Resources and Economic Development in the West: The Discount Rate in Public Investment Evaluation, Western Agricultural Economic Research Council, Denver, 1969. Reprinted in A. C. Harberger (ed.), Project Evaluation: Collected Papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, R. C. (1990). “Reassessing the Government's Discount Rate Policy in Light of New Theory and Data in a World Economy with a High Degree of Capital Mobility.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18, S8–S28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2004). “The Multi-period Cost-benefit Rule with Mobile Capital and Distorted Labor.” International Tax and Public Finance (forthcoming).

  • Ogura, S. and G. Yohe. (1977). “The Complementarity of Public and Private Capital and the Optimal Rate of Return to Government Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 651–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. (1985). “Deficits and Intergenerational Welfare in Open Economies.” Journal of International Economics 19, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestieau, P. M. (1974). “Optimal Taxation and Discount Rate for Public Investment in a Growth Setting.” Journal of Public Economics 3, 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1928). “A Mathematical Theory of Saving.” Economic Journal 38, 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1958). “ An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money.” Journal of Political Economy 66, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. A. and D. L. Wisecarver. (1977). “The Social Cost of Public Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 85 513–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. and J. Dréze. (1971). “Discount Rates for Public Investment in Closed and Open Economies.” Economica 38, 395–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1982). “The Rate of Discount for Benefit Cost Analysis and the Theory of the Second Best.” In R.C. Lind (ed.), Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Baltimore, USA: Resources for the Future, Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakita, A. (1994). “Public Investment Criterion with Distorted Capital Markets in an Overlapping Generations Economy.” Journal of Macroeconomics 16(Fall) 715–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, M. (1986). “Public Investment Criterion in an Overlapping Generations Economy.” Economica 53, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

JEL Code: F21, H43

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgess, D.F. Public Investment Criteria in Overlapping Generations Models of Open Economies. Int Tax Public Finan 13, 59–78 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-1406-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-1406-2

Keywords

Navigation