Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value Co-Creation as a Dialectical Process: Study in Bangladesh and Indian Province of West Bengal

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The process by which technological innovation is adopted and diffused within an industry persists as a key research interest in the existing literature. Furthermore, the innovation and diffusion of ICT (information and communications technology) in general and smartphones in particular are viewed as a useful resource to support and foster socio-economic wellbeing in developing countries. As such, sustainable design and development of smartphone industry in developing world and their contribution to socio-economic wellbeing has drawn significant research attention. In the current study, we explore and analyse various factors and their inter-relationships that initiate, support and disseminate technological innovation within the smartphone industry in Bangladesh and Indian province of West Bengal who share linguistic, historical and cultural ties. Drawing on the concept of co-creation of value we develop a dialectical perspective toward multi-stakeholder involvement in smartphone industry’s creation of value. Through in-depth interviews with senior government and private sector employees, industry experts, researchers, and small and medium enterprise owners, we conclude that the development of ancillary industries, contextually appropriate apps and innovation by small enterprises and inter-industry collaborations contribute to current and future innovation and sustainable development of smartphone industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.statista.com/chart/12868/the-worlds-most-spoken-languages/

  2. http://www.thedailystar.net/bytes/top-5-uber-alternatives-bangladesh-1321312

  3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-45963943

References

  • Adhikari, A. (2017), “Post demonetisation no big jump in card usage, but mobile banking and wallets gather big momentum”, business today, 6 November, 2017 [Accessed on 25 May, 2018).

  • Ahmed, S. S., Rayhan, S. J., Islam, M. A., & Mahjabin, S. (2012). Problems and prospects of mobile banking in Bangladesh. Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, 1(6), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010). Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Lal, B., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Consumer adoption of internet banking in Jordan: Examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 20(2), 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. J., Jaakkola, E., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2018). Zooming out: Actor engagement beyond the dyadic. Journal of Service Management, 29(3), 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman, S., Baldersheim, H., & Jamil, I. (2003). Talking back! Empowerment and mobile phones in rural Bangladesh: A study of the village phone scheme of Grameen Bank. Contemporary South Asia, 12(3), 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angulo-Guerrero, M., Perez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askegaard, S., & Linnet, J. T. (2011). Towards an epistemology of consumer culture theory. Phenomenology and the context of context. Marketing Theory, 11(4), 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2007). The economic lives of the poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumüller, H. (2016). Agricultural Service Delivery Through Mobile Phones: Local Innovation and Technological Opportunities in Kenya. In F. W. Gatzweiler & J. Von Braun (Eds.), Technological and Institutional Innovations for Marginalized Smallholders in Agricultural Development. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, A. (2001). Infrastructure and rural development: Insights from a Grameen Bank village phone initiative in Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics, 25, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Reinventing the meaning of development. International Affairs, 81(3), 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselli, R., Cesarini, M., & Mezzanzanica, M. (2008), Customer knowledge and service development, the web 2.0 role in co-production. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Parigi, available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6980/8433fcc52316efdc0bfe034590ee8c523967.pdf. Last accessed on 20 Dec 2018.

  • Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. (2012). Capital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 684–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach, C. F., & Maglio, P. P. (2016). Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Nunes, M. B., Zhou, L., & Peng, G. (2011). Expanding the concept of requirements traceability: the role of electronic records management in gathering evidence of crucial communications and negotiations. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 63(2/3), 168–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, D., & Wallendorf, M. (2004). The role of normative political ideology in consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, H., Ratnadiwakara, D., & Zainudeen, A. (2011). Social influence in mobile phone adoption: evidence from the bottom of the pyramid in emerging asia. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publication Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, B. L., Binsardi, B., Prendergast, R., & Saren, M. (2013). A qualitative enquiry into the appropriation of mobile telephony at the bottom of the pyramid. International Marketing Review, 30(4), 297–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, B. L., Pandit, A., Saren, M., Bhowmick, S., & Woodruff-Burton, H. (2016). Co-creation of value at the bottom of the pyramid: Analysing Bangladeshi farmers’ use of Mobile telephony. Journal of Retailing and Customer Services, 29(2), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, B.L., Babu, M. M, Rahman, M., Dora, M. and Mishra, N. (2018), “Technology upgrading through co-creation of value in developing societies: Analysis of the mobile telephone industry in Bangladesh”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (in press: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.011).

  • Diamond, A. (2006). Schumpeter's creative destruction: A review of the evidence. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1), 120–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinica, I., and Motteau, D. (2012), The market of the bottom of the pyramid: Impact on the marketing-mix of companies: A quantitative study of three African countries. Thesis. UMEA University.

  • Donner, J. (2006), “Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature”, Conference paper presented at the International Conference on Mobile Communication and Asian Modernities, City University of Hong Kong, available at: (http://research.microsoft.com/~jdonner).

  • Donner, J. (2008). “The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional missed calls on mobile phones”, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Vol., 13, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J. and Escobari, M. X. (2010), “A review of evidence on mobile use by micro and small enterprises in developing countries”,Journal of International Development,Vol 22, pp 641–658.

  • Donner, J. and Tellez, C. (2008), Mobile banking and economic development: linking adoption, impact and use, available at http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=74446a; Accessed on 02 Sept 2012.

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Khan, N., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2007). Consumer adoption and usage of broadband in Bangladesh. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(3), 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction:: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D. (2008). Asia’s “upgrading through innovation” strategies and global innovation networks: an extension of Sanjaya Lall’s research agenda. Transnational Corporations, 17(3), 22–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D. (2014). Upgrading India’s Electronics Manufacturing Industry: Regulatory Reform and Industrial Policy. Honolulu: East West Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(3), 374–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigour using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and thematic development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillieri, R., Chen, W., & Dey, B. L. (2017). The importance of enhancing, maintaining and saving face in smartphone repurchase intentions of Chinese early adopters: an exploratory study. Information technology and People, 30(3), 629–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 296–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, M., & Mendez, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 825–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, S. (2012), Purba Paschim, Ananda Publishers. ISBN-13: 978–9350401972.

  • George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing theory, 11(3), 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1520–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Gummerus, J. (2014). The service revolution and its marketing implications: Service logic vs service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 24(3), 206–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, M. R., Lowe, B., & Rahman, M. (2017). Visual cues and innovation adoption among bottom of the pyramid consumers. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(2), 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. and Jagun A. (2007), M-development: Current issues and research priorities”, short paper by development informatics, IPDM, University of Manchester, available at: http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/index.htm#sp Accessed on 21 June 2017.

  • Hermerking, M. (2005). “Culture and internet consumption: Contribution from cross cultural marketing and advertising research”, Journal of computer-mediated communication. Vol., 11, 192–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L. D., & Brodie, R. J. (2009). Wine service marketing, value co-creation and involvement: research issues. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21, 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., & McLoughlin, D. (2012). Creating new market for industrial services in nascent fields. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(5), 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., Eye, A. V., Barbatasis, G., Biocca, F., Fitzgerald, H. E., & Zhao, W. (2005). Instructional set and internet use by low-income adults. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour, 8(5), 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. H., & Grandzol, C. (2015). Value co-creation in emerging economies: Planting and harvesting innovation perspectives. International Journal of Services Sciences, 5(3–4), 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Empirical examination of the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of IRCTC Mobile ticketing service. Information Systems Management, 32(2), 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: Beyond the hype. Innovations, 6(2), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Baek, C., & Lee, J. D. (2018). Creative destruction of the sharing economy in action: The case of Uber. Transportation Research Part a-Policy and Practice, 110, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: An exploration in business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 846–869.

  • Lewis-Beck, M. A., Bryman, A., & Liao, T. F. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 163–187). London: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lii, Y. S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K., & VanDuinkerken, I. (2015). Libraries surviving as entrepreneurial organizations: A creative destruction perspective. New Library World, 116(7/8), 406–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malshe, A., & Friend, S. B. (2018). Initiating value co-creation: Dealing with non-receptive customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(5), 895–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutula, S. M., & Mostert, M. J. (2010). Challenges and opportunities of e-government in South Africa. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neghina, C., Caniels, M. C. J., Bloemer, J. M. M., & van Birgelen, M. J. H. (2015). Value cocreation in service interactions: Dimensions and antecedents. Marketing Theory, 15(2), 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., & Fryans, J. G. (2007). Beyond CSR? Business, poverty and social justice: An introduction. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 669–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P. (2015). Schumpeter’s theological roots? Harnack and the origins of creative destruction. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(1), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). Bottom-of-the-pyramid: Organizational barriers to implementation. California Management Review, 51(4), 100–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, M. A. (2000). The innovative Enterprise and corporate governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 393–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2012). Theories of Entrepreneuship, innovation and the business cycle. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payaud, M. A. (2014). Marketing strategies at the bottom of the pyramid: Examples from nestle, Danone, and Procter & Gamble. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 33(2), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, J. B., Gollakota, K., & Singh, M. (2014). Technology for development: Understanding influences on use of rural telecenters in India. Information Technology for Development, 20(4), 296–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plé, L., & Chumpitaz Cáceres, R. (2010). Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongsakornrungsilp, S., & Schroeder, J. E. (2011). Understanding value co-creation in a co-consuming brand community. Marketing Theory, 11, 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2010). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. In 5 th anniversary edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quibria, M. G., and Tschang, T. (2001), “Information and communication technology and poverty: An Asian perspective”, Working Paper Series, No. 12, Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in world science base? Analysis of catching up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics, 101, 1897–1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M., Haque, S. E., & Rashid, A. T. (2012). Nonprofits’ engagement with the private and the public sectors: The case of providing essential healthcare in rural Bangladesh. The Marketing Review, 12(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M., Hasan, M. R., & Floyd, D. (2013). Brand orientation as a strategy that influences the adoption of innovation in the bottom of the pyramid market. Strategic Change, 22(3/4), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S. V., SadreGhazi, S., & Duysters, G. (2012). On the diffusion of toilets as bottom of the pyramid innovation: Lessons from sanitation entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), 676–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami, V., & Ozcan, K. (2016). Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V., Chu, M., and Petkoski, D. (2011), “Segmenting the base of the pyramid”, Harvard Business Review, (June), p.193.

  • Ranjan, & Read. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 290–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. T., & Elder, L. (2009). Mobile phones and development: An analysis of IDRC-supported projects. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 36(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T. A., & Rahman, M. (2009). Making profit to solve development problems: The case of Telenor AS and the village phone Programme in Bangladesh. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9–10), 1049–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, D. (1995). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Retrieved from http://qualitativeresearch.ratcliffs.net/Validity.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

  • Rocca, A. L., Mandelli, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Netnography approach as a tool for marketing research: The case of Dash-P&G/TTV. Management Decision, 52(4), 689–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, S., Edvardsson, B., Kristensson, P., & Magnusson, P. (2008). Value in use through service experience. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18, 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A., (1934) (2008), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers, London (U.K.):.

  • Sharma, S., & Conduit, J. (2016). Co-creation of value in healthcare organisations. Journal of Service Research, 19(4), 438–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanis, E. (2012). Reality check at the bottom of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), p6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2013). The value co-destruction process: A customer resource perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1889–1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K., Brodie, R. J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P. P., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3008–3017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, H., & Moaniba, I. M. (2017). Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyan, S., & Tomas Gomez-Arias, J. (2008). Integrated approach to understanding consumer behavior at bottom of pyramid. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugathan, P., Ranjan, K. R., & Mulky, A. G. (2017). Atypical shifts post-failure: Influence of co-creation on attribution and future motivation to co-create. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takenaka, T., & Ueda, K. (2008). An analysis of service studies toward sustainable value creation. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 1(2), 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, D., & Sæbø, Ø. (2014). Exploring the link between ICT and development in the context of developing countries: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 64(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, K., & Belk, R. W. (2005). Extended self and possessions in the workplace. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(September), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. M. (2012). Bangladesh’s mobile telecom industry & Grameenphone limited - a strategic analysis. Dhaka: Department of Business Administration, East West University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M. (2007). Understanding product and market interactions in subsistence marketplaces: A study in South India. Advances in International Management, 20, 21–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., & Sridharan, S. (2012). Product development for the BoP: Insights on concept and prototype development from university-based student projects in India. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., and Ritchie, R. (2010). “Understanding consumption and entrepreneurship in subsistence marketplaces”. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No.6, pp570–581.

  • Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoruk, D. E. (2013). Firm-level upgrading in low- and medium-technology industries in emerging markets: the role of learning networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, December, SPRU. Available at: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47684/1/Yoruk,_Deniz_Eylem.pdf. Last accessed on 20 Dec 2018.

  • Zhou, Y., He, C. F., & Zhu, S. J. (2017). Does creative destruction work for Chinese regions? Growth and Change, 48(3), 274–296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bidit Lal Dey.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Respondent profile

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahman, M., Bose, S., Babu, M.M. et al. Value Co-Creation as a Dialectical Process: Study in Bangladesh and Indian Province of West Bengal. Inf Syst Front 21, 527–545 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09902-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09902-4

Keywords

Navigation