Institutional vs. Non-institutional use of Social Media during Emergency Response: A Case of Twitter in 2014 Australian Bush Fire

Article

Abstract

Social media plays a significant role in rapid propagation of information when disasters occur. Among the four phases of disaster management life cycle: prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery, this paper focuses on the use of social media during the response phase. It empirically examines the use of microblogging platforms by Emergency Response Organisations (EROs) during extreme natural events, and distinguishes the use of Twitter by EROs from digital volunteers during a fire hazard occurred in Australia state of Victoria in early February 2014. We analysed 7982 tweets on this event. While traditionally theories such as World System Theory and Institutional Theory focus on the role of powerful institutional information outlets, we found that platforms like Twitter challenge such notion by sharing the power between large institutional (e.g. EROs) and smaller non-institutional players (e.g. digital volunteers) in the dissemination of disaster information. Our results highlight that both large EROs and individual digital volunteers proactively used Twitter to disseminate and distribute fire related information. We also found that the contents of tweets were more informative than directive, and that while the total number of messages posted by top EROs was higher than the non-institutional ones, non-institutions presented a greater number of retweets.

Keywords

Social media Twitter Australian case study Emergency response organisations Community resilience 

References

  1. Abedin, B., Babar, A., & Abbasi, A. (2014). Characterization of the use of social Media in Natural Disasters: A systematic review. In Big Data and Cloud Computing (BdCloud), 2014 I.E. fourth international conference on (pp. 449–454).Google Scholar
  2. Abedin, B., & Jafarzadeh, H. (2013). Attracting and retaining customers on Facebook business pages: A content analysis of an online discussion forum. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 8(3), 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abedin, B. (2016). Diffusion of adoption of Facebook for customer relationship management in Australia: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 28(1), 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Queensland police service-media and public affair branch (2011). Disaster management and social media – a case study, version 1.0.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmad, A. (2011). Use of social media in disaster management. Second international conference on information systems (ICIS), paper 16.Google Scholar
  6. Alam, S. L., & Walker, D. (2011). The public Facebook: A case of Australian government Facebook pages and participation. Sydney: ACIS.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, G. A. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1638–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, D., Ling, M., & Haynes, K. (2012). Flooding Facebook-the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27.Google Scholar
  9. Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis with sna. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(6), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cha, M., Haddidi, H., Benevenuto, F. & Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallancy. 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media ICWSM, 2010 Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2008). Analysis of epidemiological data using R and epicalc. Thailand: Epidemiology Unit Prince of Songkla University.Google Scholar
  12. Cobb, C., McCarthy, T., Perkins, A., Bharadwaj, A., Comis, J., Do, B., & Starbird, K. (2014). Designing for the deluge: Understanding & supporting the distributed, collaborative work of crisis volunteers. In proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 888-899.Google Scholar
  13. Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., & Stefanidis, A. (2013). #earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaz-Uriarte, R., & Andres, S. A. D. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehnis, C. & Bunker, D. (2012). Social media in disaster response: Queensland police service - public engagement during the 2011 floods. 23rd Australasian conference on information systems, 2012 Geelong, December 3-5.Google Scholar
  16. Erfani, S. S., Blount, Y., & Abedin, B. (2016). The influence of health-specific social network site use on the psychological well-being of cancer-affected people. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(3), 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erfani, S. S., Abedin, B., & Blount, Y. (2017). The effect of social network site use on the psychological well-being of cancer patients. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1308–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson, B., Barford, P., Sommers, J., & Nowak, R. (2010). A learning-basedapproach for IP geolocation. Kishnamurthy a and Plattner B (eds) passive and active measurment. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 6032, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Falls, A. D. (2013). Brand management in social media environments: An institutional theory perspective. University of Ulster: Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  20. Golan, G. J., & Himelboim, I. (2016). Can world system theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1150–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heyde, S. V. D., Sonntag, J., Kaschek, D., Bender, C., Bues, J., Wachter, A., Timmer, J., Korf, U., & Beibarth, T. (2014). RPPanalyzer toolbox: An improved R package for analysis of reverse phase protein array data. BioTechniques, 57, 125–135.Google Scholar
  22. Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. In Proceedings of 6th international ISCRAM conference. Gothenburg: Sweeden.Google Scholar
  24. Kavanaugha, A. L., Foxa, E. A., Sheetzb, S. D., Yanga, S., Lid, L. T., Soemakerc, D. J., Natsevf, A. & Xieg, L. (2011). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. The proceedings of the 12th annual Internaitonal conference on digital government research, June 12-15 College Park, MD, USA, 121-130.Google Scholar
  25. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., & Arlitt, M. (2008). A few chirps about twitter. Seattle, Washington: WOSN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, J., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2015). Message diffusion through social network service: The case of rumor and non-rumor related tweets during Boston bombing 2013. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(5), 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lerman, K., & Ghosh, R. (2010). Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. ICWSM, 10, 90–97Google Scholar
  28. Mcnerthney, C. (2012). Shooting suspect visited bar before; gave off a ‘bad vibe. Seattle Pl.Google Scholar
  29. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., & Castillo, C. (2010). Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? 1st workshop on social media, July 25. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  30. Merchant, R. M., Elmer, S., & Lurie, N. (2011). Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(4), 289–291.Google Scholar
  31. Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumour theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 407–426.Google Scholar
  32. Poblet, M., García-Cuesta, E., & Casanovas, P. (2017). Crowdsourcing roles, methods and tools for data-intensive disaster management. Information Systems Frontiers.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9734-6.
  33. Poese, I., Uhlig, S., Kaafar, A. M., Donnet, B., & Gueys, B. (2011). IP geolocation database. Unreliable? computer communication review, 41(2), 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Popoola, A., Krasnoshtan, D., Toth, A. P., Naroditskiy, V., Castillo, C., Meier, P., et al. (2013). Information verification during natural disasters. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1029-1032). ACM. doi: 10.1145/2487788.2488111.
  35. Rosenberger, M., Lehrer, C., & Jung, R. (2016). Integrating data from user activities of social networks into public administrations. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  36. Sarcevic, A., Palen, L., White, J., Starbird, K., Bagdouri, M., & Anderson, K. (2012). Beacons of hope in decentralized coordination: Learning from on-the-ground medical twitterers during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 47-56). ACM. doi: 10.1145/2145204.2145217
  37. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Simon, T., Goldberg, A., Aharonson-Daniel, L., Leykin, D., & Adini, B. (2014). Twitter in the cross fire - the use of social media in the Westgate mall terror attack in Kenya. PloS One, 9, 1–11.Google Scholar
  39. Sinnappan, S., Farrell, C., & Stewart, E. (2010). Priceless tweets! A study on twitter messages posted during crisis: Black Saturday. In ACIS, 1–10 Dec 2010b. Brisbane: Australia.Google Scholar
  40. Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2011). Voluntweeters: Self organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. CHI, 2011, 1071–1080.Google Scholar
  41. STieglitz, S., & Kruger, N. (2011). Analysis of Sentiments in Corporate Twitter Communication – A case study on an issue of Toyota. Proceedings of 22nd Australian Conference on Information Systems, November 30–December 2 2011 Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Sutton, J. N., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergency uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires (pp. 624–632). University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  43. Tang, L., Ni, Z., Xiong, H., & Zhu, H. (2015). Locating targets through mention in twitter. World Wide Web, 18, 1019–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, M., Wells, G., Howell, G., & Raphael, B. (2012). The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, The, 27(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  45. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to the situational awareness. In CHI 2010. Atlanta Georgia: USA.Google Scholar
  46. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, B., Wang, C., Bu, J., Chen, C., Zhang, W. V., Cai, D., & He, X. (2013). Whom to mention: Expand the diffusion of tweets by @ recommendation on micro-blogging systems. In International world wide web conference, may 13–17, 2013. Rio De: Janeiro.Google Scholar
  48. Whitelaw, T., & Henson, D. (2014). All that I’m hearing from you is white noise’: Social media aggregation in emergency response. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 29, 48–51.Google Scholar
  49. Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zao, S., et al. (2011). Human as real-time sensors of social and physical events: A case study of twitter and sport games (p. TR0620). Houston: Rice University Technical Report No.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering & ITUniversity of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia
  2. 2.Sydney Business SchoolUniversity of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations