Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A cultural theory analysis of e-government: Insights from a local government council in Malaysia

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we use the ways of life proposed by cultural theory—hierarchism, fatalism, individualism, and egalitarianism—to explain the social relations and dynamics over time, which affected the ability to implement and manage a major ICT-enabled government change initiative (e-services). This is illustrated using an in-depth case study of one local government council in Malaysia. Our analysis found culture to be evident across multiple levels, including organizational (local council), subgroup (project team, operators, user group) and individual (IT consultants) in the context of the e-services project. More specifically, various characteristics of the ways of life were salient in the e-services project, particularly during the early years—mostly, hierarchism and fatalism at the organizational and subgroup levels, and individualism at the individual level. Furthermore, the study found changes, for instance, the emergence of egalitarianism at the subgroup level over time. The paper acknowledges that in order for researchers to understand how culture influences e-government, the focus of attention needs to shift from solely concentrating on the organizational level to also understanding the dynamic and fragmented nature of culture at the group and individual levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Menard (2002) encompasses “longitudinal” as a broad term, defining it as research in which a) data for each item are collected over two or more distinct time intervals, b) the cases or subjects under investigation are the same or comparable from one time interval to the next, and c) the investigation entails some comparing of data between or among time intervals.

References

  • Adler, P. (2001). Market, hierarchy and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, M. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2011). Politics of e-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 414–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching culture: Qualitative method and cultural studies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and government on-line in Canada: partnerships, people & prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sebie, M. (2015). Technical challenges facing integration e-government systems: an empirical study. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 11(3), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, A. F., Pozzebon, M., & Diniz, E. H. (2013). Rethinking e-government performance assessment from a citizen perspective. Public Administration, 91(3), 744–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, C. (2001). Reinventing government in the information age: international practice in IT-enabled public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 21(3), 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bista, D. C. (1991). Fatalism and development: Nepal's struggle for modernization. India: Sangam Books Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, J., & Robins, G. (2003). Moving towards e-government: a case study of organizational change processes. Logistics Information Management, 16(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: a cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudrie, J., Umeoji, E., & Forson, C. (2012). Diffusion of e-government in Nigeria: A qualitative study of culture and gender (pp. 1–33). Business School Working Papers: University of Hertfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1989). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A theory and some preliminary empirical evidence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N. F., & Doig, G. (2003). An analysis of the anticipated cultural impacts of the implementation of data warehouses. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(1), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London: Barrie and Rockliff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1996). Thought styles: Critical essays on good taste. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1999). Four cultures: the evolution of a parsimonious model. GeoJournal, 47(3), 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture, an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, P., & Alfonso, X. (2009). E-government and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2), 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, M., & Srite, M. (2005). Information technology and culture: identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture. Information and Organization, 15(4), 295–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasco, M. (2007). Civil servants resistance toward e-government development. London: Encyclopaedia of Digital Government, Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., & Horsburgh, S. (2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘demand-side’ of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, E., & Said, J. (2010). Digital reporting practices among Malaysian local authorities. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8(1), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia, J. R., Vivanco, L. F., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2014). Revisiting the problem of technological and social determinism: reflections for digital government scholars. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation, 254–263.

  • Gottschall, J., & Wilson, D. (2005). The literary animal evolution: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, H., & Ditsa, G. (1999). The impact of culture on the adoption of IT: an interpretive study. Journal of Global Information Management, 7(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2003). Most e-government-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? Institute for Development Policy and Management, 1–17.

  • Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, N., Ramón Gil-García, J., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2011). Organizational culture and information systems adoption: a three-perspective approach. Information and Organization, 21(2), 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Fearon, C. (2014). Exploring the role and influence of expectations in achieving VLE benefit success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Philip, G. (2010). A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Wong, M. & Philip, G. (2007). Cultural barriers/enablers in implementing e-government initiatives in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, Colorado (pp.1–12).

  • Jain, V., & Kesar, S. (2011). E-government implementation challenges at local level: a comparative study of e-government and citizens perspectives. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 8(2/3), 208–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, C. H. (2007). Fundamental of development administration. Selangor: Scholar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarst-Brown, M. L., & Robey, D. (1999). More on myth, magic and metaphor: cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations. Information Technology & People, 12(2), 192–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, S., & Jain, V. (2011). Organizational culture and e-government performance: an empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 7(2), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadaroo, I., Wong, M. S., & Abdullah, A. (2013). Barriers in local e-government partnership: evidence from Malaysia. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 10(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2003). South Korean public officials' perceptions of values, failure, and consequences of failure in e-government leadership. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 360–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopp, J. M., Marcello, E. M., Kirui, G., & Mwangi, H. (2013). Negotiating e-politics: initiating e-government in a municipal council in Kenya. Information Polity, 18(1), 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Kumar, D., & Kumar, N. (2013). Improved service delivery and cost effective framework for e-governance in India. International Journal of Computer Applications, 74, 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, D., & Kayworth, T. (2006). Review: a review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniatopoulous, G. (2005). E-government movements of organizational change: A social shaping approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Critical Management Studies Conference, Cambridge, UK (pp.1–15).

  • Mansor, M., & Tayib, M. (2010). An empirical examination of organizational culture, job stress and job satisfaction within the indirect tax administration in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(1), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, G. (1982). Cheats at work: An anthropology of workplace crime. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., & Peterson, C. (2009). The social construction of chronicity – a key to understanding chronic care transformations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15, 578–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A., Koops, B., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., & Ten Tije, S. (2012). Government 2.0: key challenges to its realization. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2014). http://jkt.kpkt.gov.my/english.php/pages/view/89 [01 10 2016]

  • Mirchandani, D., Johnson, J., & Joshi, K. (2008). Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: a multigroup analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nograšek, J. (2011). Change management as a critical success factor in e-government implementation. Business Systems Research, 2(2), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurdin, N., Stockdale, R., & Scheepers, H. (2011). Understanding organizational barriers influencing local electronic government adoption and implementation: the electronic government implementation framework. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 6(3), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. (1981). How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, G., & McKeown, I. (2004). Business transformation and organizational culture: the role of competency, IS and TQM. European Management Journal, 22(6), 624–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R., & McGrath, M. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values perspective. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. Louis, C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture (pp. 315–334). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaraj, P., & Bhasker, M. (2011). The RFID technology adoption in e-government: issues and challenges. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 7(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Williams, M. (2015a). A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(3), 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2015b). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: from the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M., Swan, J., & Newell, S. (2000). Interorganisational networks and the diffusion process: The case of networks not working. In K. Kautz., & J. Pries-Heje (Eds.) Diffusion and adoption of information technology (pp.147–159), London: Chapman and Hall.

  • Robey, D., & Azevedo, A. (1994). Cultural analysis of the organizational consequences of information technology. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufín, R., Medina, C., & Sánchez Figueroa, J. C. (2012). Moderating factors in adopting local e-government in Spain. Local Government Studies, 38(3), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, C. P., & Harrington, S. J. (2001). Sharing knowledge through intranets: a study of organizational culture and intranet implementation. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 44(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretitivism, hermeneutics and social constructivism. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189–214). Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage Publications.

  • Schwarz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology, and social choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. (2014). Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(4), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern, S., & Hilton, K. (2015). Annual review of addictions and offender counseling II: Best practices. Eugene, Oregon: Resource Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2005) Qualitative case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd edition, pp. 433–466). Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage Publications.

  • Stoker, G., Mason, A., McGrew, A., Armstrong, C., Owen, D., Smith, G., et al. (2011). Prospects for citizenship. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svärd, P. (2014). The impact of information culture on information/records management: a case study of a municipality in Belgium. Records Management Journal, 24(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Political cultures series. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsby, J. (1998). Effects of organizational culture on a large scale IT introduction effort: a case study of the Norwegian army's EDBLF project. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsohou, A., Karyda, M., Kokolakis, S., & Kiountouzis, E. (2006). Formulating information systems risk management strategies through cultural theory. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(3), 198–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twati, J. M., & Gammack, J. G. (2006). The impact of organizational culture innovation on the adoption of IS/IT: the case of Libya. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, A., Cuijpers, C., Vantsiouri, P., & Ferrari, M. Z. (2014). The law as a ‘catalyst and facilitator’ for trust in e-health: challenges and opportunities. Law, Innovation and Technology, 6(2), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaykumar, N. (2011). Role of ICT in e-governance impact of cloud computing in driving new initiatives. SETLabs Briefings, 9(2), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: the cultural match. Training and Development Journal, 37(2), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Sabol, T., Ghoneim, A., & Dzupka, P. (2012). E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: a comparative study. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Osman, I., & Hindi, N. (2015). E-government implementation: a bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(4), 889–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M. S., Jackson, S., & Philip, G. (2009). Cultural issues in developing E-government in Malaysia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(4), 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. (2013). Information culture in a government organization: examining records management training and self-perceived competencies in compliance with a records management program. Records Management Journal, 23(1), 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., & Melitski, J. (2007). Competing and complementary values in information technology strategic planning: observations from ten states. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 426–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK

    Stephen Jackson

  2. University of Nottingham, Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Meng Seng Wong

Authors
  1. Stephen Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng Seng Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, S., Wong, M.S. A cultural theory analysis of e-government: Insights from a local government council in Malaysia. Inf Syst Front 19, 1391–1405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9652-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9652-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation