Skip to main content

Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions

Abstract

Information systems success and failure are among the most prominent streams in IS research. Explanations of why some IS fulfill their expectations, whereas others fail, are complex and multi-factorial. Despite the efforts to understand the underlying factors, the IS failure rate remains stubbornly high. A Panel session was held at the IFIP Working Group 8.6 conference in Bangalore in 2013 which forms the subject of this Special Issue. Its aim was to reflect on the need for new perspectives and research directions, to provide insights and further guidance for managers on factors enabling IS success and avoiding IS failure. Several key issues emerged, such as the need to study problems from multiple perspectives, to move beyond narrow considerations of the IT artifact, and to venture into underexplored organizational contexts, such as the public sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Percieved usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ahmad, W., Al-Fagih, K., Khanfar, K., Alsamara, K., Abuleil, S., & Abu-Salem, H. (2009). A taxonomy of an it project failure: root causes. International Management Review, 5(1), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2003). 18 reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace “the IT artifact” as the core subject matter of the IS field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(23), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2008). Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). IT failure and the collapse of One. Tel. In Information Systems: Springer, pp. 31–46.

  • Bamberger, P. (2008). Beyond contextualization: using context theories to narrow the macro–micro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, C. (2008). Towards an integrated measurement of is project performance: the project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., & Frolick, M. N. (2003). ERP implementation failure: a case study. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). User participation, conflict, and conflict resolution: the mediating roles of influence. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 422–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis Tam? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (8:3), pp. 211–218.

  • Bergman, M., King, J. L., & Lyytinen, K. (2002). Large scale requirements analysis revisited: the need for understanding the political ecology of requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 7(3), 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (1995). Information systems ‘failure’: the case of the London ambulance service’s computer aided despatch project. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (1999). Human error and information systems failure: the case of the London ambulance service computer-aided despatch system project. Interacting with Computers, 11(6), 699–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. (2007). Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bignell, V., & Fortune, J. (1984). Understanding Systems Failure: Manchester University Press.

  • Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an it implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruque, S., Moyano, J., & Eisenberg, J. (2008). “Individual adaptation to it-induced change: the role of social networks,”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, D. J., Kautz, K., & Nguyen, A. (2007). The role of value compatibility in it adoption. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, D., Levine, L., & Woody, C. (2013). Repertoires of Collaboration for Disaster Management: Negotiating Emergent and Dynamic Systems Success. In proceedings of Grand Successes and Failures in IT IFIP WG8.6 Working Conference Bangalore, India June 27 – 29, 2013.

  • Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 657–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussen, W., & Myers, M. D. (1997). Executive information system failure: a New Zealand case study. Journal of Information Technology, 12(2), 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caseley, J. (2004). Public sector reform and corruption: card facade in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(11), 1151–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerpa, N., & Verner, J. M. (2009). Why did your project fail? Communications of the ACM, 52(12), 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Weerakkody, V., & Janssen, M. (2011). Moving towards maturity: challenges to successful e-government implementation and diffusion. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(4), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Kapoor, K. K., Williams, M. D., & Williams, J. (2013a). RFID systems in libraries: an empirical examination of factors affecting system use and user satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Ravichandran, K., Williams, M. D., Miller, S., Lal, B., Antony, G. V., & Kartik, M. (2013b). “IS/it project failures: A review of the extant literature for deriving a taxonomy of failure factors,” in grand successes and failures in it. In Y. K. Dwivedi, H. Z. Henriksen, D. Wastell, & R. De’ (Eds.), Public and private sectors (pp. 73–88). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y.K., Henriksen, H.Z., Wastell, D., & De’, R. (eds.). (2013c). Grand Successes and Failures in IT: Public and Private Sectors. Springer.

  • Elbanna, A. R. (2007). Implementing an integrated system in a socially Dis-integrated enterprise: a critical view of ERP enabled integration. Information Technology and People, 20(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbanna, A. (2012). Top management support in multiple-project environments: an in-practice view. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewusi-Mensah, K. (2003). Software development failures: anatomy of abandoned projects: The MIT press.

  • Fitzgerald, G., & Russo, N. L. (2005). The turnaround of the London ambulance service computer-aided despatch system (LASCAD). European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing information system success: the is-impact measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity, E. J. (2001). Synthesizing user centered and designer centered is development approaches using general systems theory. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(1), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., & Straub, D.W. (2000). The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in Information Systems Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1 (1), Article 8. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol1/iss1/8

  • Gibson, C. F. (2003). IT-enabled business change: an approach to understanding and managing risk. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(2), 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, M. J. (1981). Key recurrent issues in the mis implementation process. MIS Quarterly, 5(2), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, E. L. (2005). It failure rates: 70 % or 10–15 %? IEEE Software, 22(3), 112–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2006). Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K. B., Singhal, V. R., & Stratman, J. K. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: a study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., & Newman, M. (1988). Information systems and user resistance: theory and practice. The Computer Journal, 31(5), 398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1997). The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Information and Management, 32(3), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 8–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasperson, J. S., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J. P., & Zheng, W. (2002). Review: power and information technology research: a Metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappelman, L. A., McKeeman, R., & Zhang, L. (2006). Early warning signs of it project failure: the dominant dozen. Information Systems Management, 23(4), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Cule, P. E., Lyytinen, K., & Schmidt, R. C. (1998). A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM, 41(11), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. J., Sambamurthy, V., Ko, D.-G., & Purvis, R. L. (2002). Controlling information systems development projects: the view from the client. Management Science, 48(4), 484–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, H. (2000). What is ERP? Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, T., & Blanton, J. E. (2010). User resistance determinants and the psychological contract in enterprise system implementations. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(6), 625–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C. (2002). Supply Chain: Hershey's Bittersweet Lesson. CIO Magazin, November, 15, online available: http://www.cio.com/article/31518/Supply_Chain_Hershey_s_Bittersweet_Lesson (last access: 2nd Oct. 2013)

  • Koch, C. (2004). Nike Rebounds: How (and Why) Nike Recovered from Its Supply Chain Disaster. CIO Magazin, June 15, online available: http://www.cio.com/article/32334/Nike_Rebounds_How_and_Why_Nike_Recovered_from_Its_Supply_Chain_Disaster (last access: 2nd Oct. 2013)

  • Koch, C. (2007). When Bad Things Happen to Good Projects. CIO Magazin, April, 2, online available: http://www.cio.com/article/101505/When_Bad_Things_Happen_to_Good_Projects (last access: 2nd Oct. 2013)

  • Kroenke, D., Bunker, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). Experiencing MIS (2nd ed.). Sydney: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, U., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2007). A knowledge management success model: theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). A taxonomy of antecedents of information systems success: variable analysis studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(2), 169–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumer, S., & Eckhardt, A. (2012). “Why do people reject technologies: a review of user resistance theories,” in Information Systems Theory (Eds Dwivedi et al.): Springer, pp. 63–86.

  • Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Trunk, N. (2010). Do as your parents say? - analyzing it adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumer, S., Maier, C., Weitzel, T., & Eckhardt, A. (2012). The Implementation of Large-Scale Information Systems in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises–A Case Study of Work-and Health-Related Consequences in 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 3159–3168.

  • Laumer, S., Beimborn, D., Maier, C., & Weinert, C. (2013). Enterprise content management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 449–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. C., & Myers, M. D. (2004). Dominant actors, political agendas, and strategic shifts over time: a critical ethnography of an enterprise systems implementation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(4), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Wyner, G. M., & Pentland, B. T. (2008). Process grammar as a tool for business process design. MIS Quarterly, 32, 757–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linberg, K. R. (1999). Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case strudy. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(2–3), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P., Karuga, G., & Richardson, V. (2007). Assessing leading institutions, faculty, and articles in premier information systems research journals. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20(16), 142–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C. (1975). Why information systems fail. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1988). Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature. In Oxford surveys in information technology, pp. 257–309.

  • Madon, S. (2005). Governance lessons from the experience of Telecentres in Kerala. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). Online Social Networks as a Source and Symbol of Stress: An Empirical Analysis, In proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando (FL).

  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2013). Analyzing the impact of HRIS implementations on HR personnel's job satisfaction and turnover intention. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(3), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2014). Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites. Forthcoming in European Journal of Information Systems. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics and mis implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (2004). Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 19(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., & Fenema, P. C. (2000). Multisite ERP Implementations. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsons, M., Davison, R., & Tse, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems, 25(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, K. (2002). The Golden Circle: a way of arguing and acting about technology in the London Ambulance Service. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Mariam-Zahedi, F. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of it business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (1994). A disaster for everyone to see: an interpretive analysis of a failed is project. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(4), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT project management: infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(2), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., Hackney, R., & Pan, S. L. (2008). Information systems implementation failure: insights from prism. International Journal of Information Management, 28(4), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2009). The sociology of a market analysis tool: how industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets. Information and Organization, 19, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qumer Gill A & Bunker D (2011). Conceptualization of a Context Aware Cloud Adaptation (CACA) Framework. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing CGC 2011, Sydney, Australia, 14th December 2011

  • Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of is success models: an empirical Testand theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013a). Evaluating the validity of is success models for e-government research: an empirical test and integrated model. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 9(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013b). Analysing challenges, barriers and critical success factors of e-Government adoption research. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., & Williams, M.D. (2013c). A Meta-Analysis of Existing Research on Citizen Adoption of E-Government. Information Systems Frontiers, available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10796-013-9431-z

  • Ravishankar, M. N. (2013). Public ICT innovations: a strategic ambiguity perspective. Journal of Information Technology. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information system success: individual and organizational determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1993). Why information systems fail: a case study approach: Alfred Waller Ltd., Publishers.

  • Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001). Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., & Vessey, I. (2000). Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: the role of learning from failure. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., & Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of information systems success. Communication of the AIS, 2, Article 20. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol2/iss1/20

  • Shareef, M. A., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). E-government adoption model (gam): differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, S., Kohli, R., & Baron, A. (2003). Complementary investment in change management and it investment payoff. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(3), 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, C., Kein, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Enterprise resource planning: cultural fit and misfits: is erp a universal solution? Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C. (2011). Is e-government providing the promised returns?: a value framework for assessing e-government impact. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007). E-government payoffs: evidence from cross-country data. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2008). The relationship between e-government and national competitiveness: the moderating influence of environmental factors. Communications of the AIS, 23, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2009). Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the AIS, 25, 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2010). E-government, e-business and national economic performance. Communications of the AIS, 26, 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2011). Development and impact of e-government: the intertwined role of e-commerce from a cross-country stakeholder perspective. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 8(2–3), 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., Mathur, S. S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007a). Modernization of passenger reservation system: Indian railway's dilemma. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S.C., Teo, T.S.H., & Chandra, S. (2007b). E-Government and Corruption: A Cross-Country Analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2007), December 9–12, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

  • Srivastava, S. C., Mathur, S. S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2009). Competing technology options and stakeholder interests for tracking freight railcars in Indian railways. Journal of Information Technology, 24, 392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. M., & Volkoff, O. (2010). Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 731–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Li, J. (2008). Trust and e-government success: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2009). The state of research on information systems success. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(4), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Westhuizen, D., & Fitzgerald, E.P. (2005). Defining and Measuring Project Success," European Conference on IS Management, Leadership and Governance: Reading, United Kingdom: Academic Conferences Limited, pp. 157–163.

  • Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: theorizing it-associated organizational change process. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., & Elmes, M. B. (2007). Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science, 18, 832–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wailgum, T. (2005). University ERP: Big Mess on Campus. CIO Magazin, May 1, online available: http://www.cio.com/article/107706/University_ERP_Big_Mess_on_Campus (last access: 2nd Oct. 2013)

  • Wailgum, T. (2009). 10 Famous ERP Disasters, Dustups and Disappointments. CIO Magazin, March 24, online available: http://www.cio.com/article/486284/10_Famous_ERP_Disasters_Dustups_and_Disappointments?page=1&taxonomyId=3009 (last access: 2nd Oct. 2013)

  • Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004). Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTS? Reflections on a future agenda for the is field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, K. T. (2002). Critical failure factors in information system projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855–879.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yogesh K. Dwivedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dwivedi, Y.K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S. et al. Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Inf Syst Front 17, 143–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y

Keywords

  • IS success
  • IS failure
  • IS implementation
  • Work systems
  • Technochange
  • Change management