Skip to main content
Log in

A decision support system for locating weapon and radar positions in stationary point air defence

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a decision support system (DSS) based on the interactive use of location models and geographical information systems (GIS) was developed to determine the optimal positions for air defence weapons and radars. In the location model, the fire units are considered as the facilities to be located and the possible approach routes of air vehicles are treated as demand points. Considering the probability that fire by the units will miss the targets, the objective of the problem is to determine the positions that provide coverage of the approach routes of the maximum number of weapons while considering the military principles regarding the tactical use and deployment of units. In comparison with the conventional method, the proposed methodology presents a more reliable, faster, and more efficient solution. On the other hand, owing to the DSS, a battery commander who is responsible for air defence becomes capable of determining the optimal weapon and radar positions, among the alternative ones he has identified, that cover the possible approach routes maximally. Additionally, he attains the capability of making such decisions in a very short time without going to the field over which he will perform the defence and hence without being subject to enemy threats. In the decision support system, the digital elevation model is analysed using Map Objects 2.0, the mathematical model is solved using LINGO 4.0 optimization software, and the user interface and data transfer are supported by Visual Basic 6.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. North Atlantic Treaty Organization Standardization Agreement (STANAG 3809)

    Digital Terrain Elevation Data Exchange Format (10.10.1994)

References

  • Batta, R., Dolan, J. M., & Krishnamurthy, N. N. (1989). The maximal expected covering location problem: revisited. Transportation Science, 23, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, O., & Krass, D. (2002). The generalized maximal covering location problem. Computers and Operations Research, 29, 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L. (2002). Geographical information systems and location science. Computers & Operations Research, 29, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L., & Revelle, C. S. (1974). The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 32, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, L., & Sorensen, P. (1994). Integrating normative location models into GIS: problems and prospects with the p-median model. technical report 94-5, national center for geographic information and analyses.

  • Crossland, M. D., Wynne, B. E., & Perkins, W. C. (1995). Spatial decision support systems: an overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decision Support Systems, 14(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current, J., Daskin, M. S., & Schilling, D. (2002). Discrete network location models. In Z. Drezner & H. Hamacher (Eds.), Facility location theory: applications and methods (Chapter 3) (pp. 81–118). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin, M. S. (1983). A maximum expected covering location model: formulation, properties and heuristic solution. Transportation Science, 17(1), 48–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin, M. S. (1995). Network and discrete location: models, algorithms and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-01897-1.

  • Davis, B. E. (2001). GIS: A visual approach (2nd ed.). Albany: Onword Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Z. (1995). Facility location: A survey of applications and methods. New York: Springer -Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, E., & Neuman, S. (1989). Analytic models for locating undesirable facilities. European Journal of Operational Research, 40, 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. L., McGinnis, L. F., & White, J. A. (1983). Locational analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 220–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. (2002). Siting observers on terrain. Symposium on geospatial theory, processing and applications, Ottawa.

  • Galvao, R. D., & Revelle, C. A. (1996). Lagrangean heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. European Journal of Operations Research, 88, 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencer, C., Aydogan, K. E., & Celik, C. (2008a). A decision support system for locating vhf/uhf radio jammer systems on the terrain. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencer, C., Aydogan, K. E., & Soydemir, A. (2008b). Chemical agent detector placement methodology. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 542–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. M. (1975). A set covering approach to bus stop location. Omega, 3, 605–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Lee, J. (1989). Coverage problems and visibility regions on topographic surfaces. Annals of Operations Research, 18, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T. S., & Moberg, C. R. (2003). Location science research: a review. Annals of Operations Research, 123, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasakal, O., & Karasakal, E. K. (2004). A maximal covering location model in the presence of partial coverage. Computers & Operations Research, 31, 1515–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorena, L. A. N., & Pereira, M. A. (2002). A lagrangean/surrogate heuristic for the maximal covering location problem using Hillsman’s edition. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minciardi, R., Sacile, R., & Siccardi, F. (2002). A decision support system for the optimal planning of a weather radar network: a case study. Proceedings of erad. 388–393.

  • Owen, S. H. & Daskin, M. S. (1998). Strategic facility location: a review. European Journal of Operational Research. CXI, 423–447

  • Revelle, C. S., & Eiselt, H. A. (2005). Location analysis: a synthesis and survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(1), 1–l9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibea, K. P., Carstensen, L. W., Carstensen, J. B., Rakesc, T. R., & Reesc, P. L. (2006). Going the last mile: a spatial decision support system for wireless broadband communications. Decision Support Systems, 42, 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cevriye Gencer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanergüçlü, T., Maraş, H., Gencer, C. et al. A decision support system for locating weapon and radar positions in stationary point air defence. Inf Syst Front 14, 423–444 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9269-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9269-6

Keywords

Navigation