Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 423–444 | Cite as

A decision support system for locating weapon and radar positions in stationary point air defence

  • Türker Tanergüçlü
  • Hakan Maraş
  • Cevriye GencerEmail author
  • Haluk Aygüneş


In this study, a decision support system (DSS) based on the interactive use of location models and geographical information systems (GIS) was developed to determine the optimal positions for air defence weapons and radars. In the location model, the fire units are considered as the facilities to be located and the possible approach routes of air vehicles are treated as demand points. Considering the probability that fire by the units will miss the targets, the objective of the problem is to determine the positions that provide coverage of the approach routes of the maximum number of weapons while considering the military principles regarding the tactical use and deployment of units. In comparison with the conventional method, the proposed methodology presents a more reliable, faster, and more efficient solution. On the other hand, owing to the DSS, a battery commander who is responsible for air defence becomes capable of determining the optimal weapon and radar positions, among the alternative ones he has identified, that cover the possible approach routes maximally. Additionally, he attains the capability of making such decisions in a very short time without going to the field over which he will perform the defence and hence without being subject to enemy threats. In the decision support system, the digital elevation model is analysed using Map Objects 2.0, the mathematical model is solved using LINGO 4.0 optimization software, and the user interface and data transfer are supported by Visual Basic 6.0.


Facility location Maximum expected covering model Geographical information systems Decision support system Air defence 


  1. Batta, R., Dolan, J. M., & Krishnamurthy, N. N. (1989). The maximal expected covering location problem: revisited. Transportation Science, 23, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, O., & Krass, D. (2002). The generalized maximal covering location problem. Computers and Operations Research, 29, 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Church, R. L. (2002). Geographical information systems and location science. Computers & Operations Research, 29, 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Church, R. L., & Revelle, C. S. (1974). The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 32, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Church, L., & Sorensen, P. (1994). Integrating normative location models into GIS: problems and prospects with the p-median model. technical report 94-5, national center for geographic information and analyses.Google Scholar
  6. Crossland, M. D., Wynne, B. E., & Perkins, W. C. (1995). Spatial decision support systems: an overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decision Support Systems, 14(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Current, J., Daskin, M. S., & Schilling, D. (2002). Discrete network location models. In Z. Drezner & H. Hamacher (Eds.), Facility location theory: applications and methods (Chapter 3) (pp. 81–118). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Daskin, M. S. (1983). A maximum expected covering location model: formulation, properties and heuristic solution. Transportation Science, 17(1), 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daskin, M. S. (1995). Network and discrete location: models, algorithms and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-01897-1.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, B. E. (2001). GIS: A visual approach (2nd ed.). Albany: Onword Press.Google Scholar
  11. Drezner, Z. (1995). Facility location: A survey of applications and methods. New York: Springer -Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Erkut, E., & Neuman, S. (1989). Analytic models for locating undesirable facilities. European Journal of Operational Research, 40, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis, R. L., McGinnis, L. F., & White, J. A. (1983). Locational analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 220–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin, R. (2002). Siting observers on terrain. Symposium on geospatial theory, processing and applications, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  15. Galvao, R. D., & Revelle, C. A. (1996). Lagrangean heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. European Journal of Operations Research, 88, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gencer, C., Aydogan, K. E., & Celik, C. (2008a). A decision support system for locating vhf/uhf radio jammer systems on the terrain. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gencer, C., Aydogan, K. E., & Soydemir, A. (2008b). Chemical agent detector placement methodology. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gleason, J. M. (1975). A set covering approach to bus stop location. Omega, 3, 605–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodchild, M. F., & Lee, J. (1989). Coverage problems and visibility regions on topographic surfaces. Annals of Operations Research, 18, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hale, T. S., & Moberg, C. R. (2003). Location science research: a review. Annals of Operations Research, 123, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karasakal, O., & Karasakal, E. K. (2004). A maximal covering location model in the presence of partial coverage. Computers & Operations Research, 31, 1515–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorena, L. A. N., & Pereira, M. A. (2002). A lagrangean/surrogate heuristic for the maximal covering location problem using Hillsman’s edition. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9, 57–67.Google Scholar
  23. Minciardi, R., Sacile, R., & Siccardi, F. (2002). A decision support system for the optimal planning of a weather radar network: a case study. Proceedings of erad. 388–393.Google Scholar
  24. Owen, S. H. & Daskin, M. S. (1998). Strategic facility location: a review. European Journal of Operational Research. CXI, 423–447Google Scholar
  25. Revelle, C. S., & Eiselt, H. A. (2005). Location analysis: a synthesis and survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(1), 1–l9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheibea, K. P., Carstensen, L. W., Carstensen, J. B., Rakesc, T. R., & Reesc, P. L. (2006). Going the last mile: a spatial decision support system for wireless broadband communications. Decision Support Systems, 42, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Türker Tanergüçlü
    • 1
  • Hakan Maraş
    • 2
  • Cevriye Gencer
    • 3
    Email author
  • Haluk Aygüneş
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Operational Research, Defence Sciences InstituteTurkish Military AcademyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Photogrammetry DepartmentGeneral Coımmand of MappingAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureÇankaya UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations