Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 279–299 | Cite as

Hidden assumptions and their influence on clinicians’ acceptance of new IT systems in the NHS

  • Senaka Fernando
  • Jyoti ChoudrieEmail author
  • Mark Lycett
  • Sergio de Cesare


The UK National Health Service (NHS) is embarking on the largest investment programme in Information Technology (IT). The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) in the NHS is the biggest civil IT project in the world and seeks to revolutionise the way care is delivered, drive up quality and make more effective use of resources of the NHS. Despite these high expectations, the NHS has historically experienced some high profile IT failures and the sponsors of the programme admitted that there remain a number of critical barriers to the implementation of the programme. Clinicians’ reluctance to accept new IT systems at a local level is seen to be a major factor in this respect. Focusing on such barriers, this paper reports research that explored and explained why such reluctance occurs in the NHS. The main contribution of this research derives from the distinctive approach based on Kelly’s Personal Construct Theory (PCT) to understand the ‘reluctance’. The argument presented in the paper indicates that such reluctance should be viewed not as deliberate resistance imposed by clinicians, but as their inability of changing their established group personal constructs related to ISDD activities. Therefore, this paper argues that the means that could occur to reduce the ‘reluctance’ are creative rather than corrective or normative. The research took place in a NHS Trust and the paper pays considerable attention to technological, behavioural and clinical perspectives that emerged from the study. The research was conducted as a case study in a NHS trust and data was collected from two local NHS IT project. The main research participants in this study were: (a) IT professionals including IT project managers and senior IT managers; and (b) senior clinicians.


Healthcare information systems development and delivery National Health Service Reluctance Cognitions Personal constructs theory 


  1. Adams-Webber, J. (2003). Research in personal construct psychology. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct theory. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Banister, D. (2003). A brief introduction to personal construct theory. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International hand book of personal construct theory. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, M. I. (1999). Challenges of EDI adoption for electronic trading in the London insurance market. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: a cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I., Goldestein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bend, J. (2004). Public value and E-Health, Institute of Public Policy Research.
  7. Berner, E. S., Detmer, D. E., & Simberg, D. (2005). Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical recording in the United State. Journal of the American Medical Information Association, 12(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourn, J. (2006). Department of Health, The National Programme for IT in the NHS. London: The National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  9. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, S. (2005). The NHS IT project. Oxford: Radcliffe.Google Scholar
  11. Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1997). Improving business and information strategy alignment: learning from the banking industry. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunas-Wagstaff, J. (1998). Personality. A cognitive approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Butt, T. (2004). Understanding, explanation, and personal constructs. Personal Constructs Theory and Practice, 1, 21–27.Google Scholar
  14. Collins T (2003). How the national programme came to be the health service’s riskiest IT project. Computer Weekly, 16 September 2003,
  15. Cornelius, N. (2003). The struggles of organizational transitions. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Dalton, P., & Dunnett, G. (1992). A psychology for living. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, E. J. (2002). Technology frames and framing: a socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, E., & Pai, D. (2004). Making sense of technology frames: Promise, progress and potential. In B. Kaplan, D. Truex, D. Wastell, T. Wood-Harper, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice (pp. 473–491). Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  19. DeSanctis, G., & Courtney, J. F. (1983). Toward friendly user MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 732–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunnett, G., & Llewelyn, S. (1988). Elaborating PCT in a group setting. In G. Dunnett (Ed.), Working with people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Fransella, F. (2003). Some skills and tools for personal construct practitioner. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fransella, F., & Dalton, P. (2000). Personal construct counselling in action. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Fransella, F., & Thomas, L. (1988). Experiment with personal construct psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Fransella, F., Jones, H., & Watson, J. (1988). A range of application of PCP within business and industry. In F. Fransella & L. Thomas (Eds.), Experimenting with personal construct psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gabriele, C., & Nuzzo, M. L. (2003). Kelly’s philosophy of constructive alternativism. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Gioia, D. A., & Manz, C. C. (1985). Linking cognition and behavior: a script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 527–539.Google Scholar
  28. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hendy, J., Reeves, B. C., Fulop, N., Hutchings, A., & Masseria, C. (2005). Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology a qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 331, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hendy, J., Fulop, N., Reeves, B. C., Hutchins, A., & Collins, S. (2007). Implementing the NHS Information Technology Programme: Qualitative study of progress in acute trusts. British Medical Journal, BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551 (published 17 May 2007).
  31. Hinkle, D. (1965). The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  32. Houston, J. (1998). Making sense with offenders, personal construct therapy and change. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Hunter, M. G. (1997). The use of RepGrid to gather interview data about information systems analysts. Information Systems Journal, 7, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jasperson, J., Carte, T. A., & Saunders, C. S. (2002). Review: power and information technology research, a metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joshi, K. (1991). A model of users’ perspective on change: a case of information systems technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan, B. (2001). Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keen, P. G. W. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly, G. A. (1932). Understandable psychology. Hertfordshire: Franesella PCP Collection.Google Scholar
  39. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton. Reprinted by Routledge (London), 1991.Google Scholar
  40. Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Nortan and Company.Google Scholar
  41. Kelly, G. A. (1969). Clinical psychology and personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2006). Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(11), 1573–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, J., & Truex, P. (2000). Exploring the impact of formal training in ISD methods on the cognitive structure of novice information systems developers. Information Systems Journal, 10, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lin, A., & Silva, L. (2005). The social and political construct of technological frames. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lorenzi, N. M., & Riley, R. T. (2000). Managing change: an overview. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 7(2), 116–124.Google Scholar
  48. Maiden, N. A., & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: a framework for acquisition of requirements. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communication of the ACM, 26, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moch, M. K., & Fields, W. C. (1986). Developing a content analysis for interpreting language use in organizations. In S. Bacharach & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Perspectives in organization sociology. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  51. NAO. (2008). The National Programme for IT in the NHS: Progress since 2006. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  52. Neimeyer, R. A. (2003). Personal construct psychotherapy and the constructivist horizon. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. NHS. (1998). NHS executive, information for health, an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998–2005, Department of Health.Google Scholar
  54. NHS. (2003a). NHS Configuration, National Programme for IT, An Interview with Richard Granger and Peter Hutton, Briefing, September, Department of Health.Google Scholar
  55. NHS. (2003b). NHS Configuration, National Programme for IT, Briefing, August.Google Scholar
  56. Orlikowski, W., & Gash, D. C. (1991). Changing frames: Understanding technological changes in organizations. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  57. Robertson, A. (2003). Making sense of group mind. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International hand book of personal construct theory (pp. 339–348). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Rugg, G., & McGeorge, P. (1995). Laddering. Expert Systems, 12, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rugg, G., Eva, M., Mahmood, A., & Rehman, N. (2002a). Eliciting information about organizational culture via laddering. Information Systems Journal, 12, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rugg, G., Eva, M., Mahmood, A., Rehman, N., Andrews, S., & Davies, S. (2002b). Eliciting information about organizational culture via laddering. Information Systems Journal, 12, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schein, E. H. (1971). Coercive persuasion. New York: W H Norton.Google Scholar
  62. Schein, E. H. (1992) ‘How Can Organizations Learn Faster: The Problem of Entering the Green Room’, Invited address to the World Economic Forum, 6 February 1992, MIT Sloan School of Management, Spring 1992, Working Paper 340#992.Google Scholar
  63. Schuster, D. M., Hall, S. E., Couse, C. B., Swayngim, D. S., & Kohatsu, K. Y. (2003). Involving users in the implementation of an imaging order entry systems. Journal of the American Medical Information Association, 10, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scott, J. T., Rundall, T. G., Vogt, T. M., & Hsu, J. (2005). Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 331(7528), 1313–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, C. P. (2000) Content Analysis and Narrative Analysis, In H.T. Reis and C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Stewart, V., & Stewart, A. (1981). Business application of repertory grid. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  67. Tan, F. B. (2002). The repertory grid technique: a method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tan, F. B. & Gallupe, R.B (2003) “A Framework for Research into Business-IT Alignment: A Cognitive Emphasis,” in Business Strategies for Information TechnologyManagement, Kalle Kangas (Ed), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  69. Tan, F. B., Gallupe, R. B., & Diaz, J. A. (2001). Aligning business and IT thinking: A cognitive approach, Dept of Management Science and Information Systems, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, School of Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada: 1–42.Google Scholar
  70. Viney, L. L. (1996). Personal construct therapy. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  71. Winter, D. A. (1992). Personal construct psychology in clinical practice; theory, research and applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Winter, D. A. (2003). The evidence base for personal construct psychotherapy. In F. Fransella (Ed.), International handbook of personal construct psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Senaka Fernando
    • 1
  • Jyoti Choudrie
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mark Lycett
    • 1
  • Sergio de Cesare
    • 1
  1. 1.Brunel UniversityUxbridgeUK
  2. 2.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations