Skip to main content
Log in

Orthogonal tests and precipitation estimates for the outside signal fluidic sprinkler

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

A new outside signal fluidic sprinkler is proposed in this paper. Its main structural parameters include offset length (A), working area length (B), plate cover diameter (C), and lead-flow length (D). An orthogonal array with four factors and three levels was selected to carry out the experiments. The factors influencing the coefficient of uniformity (CU) and range, in decreasing order of importance, were BADC and CDBA, respectively. The optimal values for the structural parameters were confirmed. The radial water distribution data for the sprinkler were obtained by experimentation. Water distribution figure for single sprinkler was drawn using Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB), which allowed for three-dimensional visualization of the data. The combined CU of the outside signal fluidic sprinkler was simulated for different combined spacing patterns. The CU was much larger in the rectangular configuration than in the triangular configuration. When the combined spacing coefficient was 1.2 to 1.3, the CU was found to exceed 75% in both the rectangular and triangular configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASAE Standards, 32nd Ed (1985a) S 330.1. Procedure for sprinkler distribution testing for research purposes. ASAE, St. Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  • ASAE Standards, 32nd Ed (1985b) S 398.1. Procedure for sprinkler testing and performance reporting. ASAE, St. Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JE (1942) Irrigation by sprinkling. Bulletin 670. California Agricultural Experiment Station, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Coanda H (1936) Device for deflecting a stream of elastic fluid projected into an elastic fluid. US 2052869.

  • Deng LH, Hao PY. (2003) Software based on Delphi for analysis of sprinkler head insufflation. J. Shangdong Univ. Tech. (Sci & Tech), 17(3): 33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes MD (2006) Effect of wind speed and pressure on linear move irrigation system uniformity. Appl Eng Agric 22(4):541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Faci JM, Salvador R, Playan E, Sourell H (2001) Comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(4):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendawi M, Molle B, Folton C, Granier J (2005) Measurement accuracy analysis of sprinkler irrigation rainfall in relation to collector shape. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(5):477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills DJ, Barragan J (1998) Application uniformity for fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. Appl Eng Agric 14(1):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 7749-2: (1990), MOD. Agricultural irrigation equipment—rotating sprinklers—Part 2: Uniformity of distribution and test methods. Int. Standards Organization

  • Li J, Hiroshi K (1998) Sprinkler performance as affected by nozzle inner contraction angle. Irrig Sci 18:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louie MJ, Selker JS (2000) Sprinkler head maintenance effects on water application uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(3):142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert TP, Victor P (1998) Irrigation process optimization using taguchi orthogonal experiments. Comput ind Eng 35(1–2):209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon K (1979) Variability of sprinkler coefficient of uniformity test results. Trans ASAE 22(5):1078–1080 1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourell H, Faci JM, Playán E (2003) Performance of rotating spray plate sprinklers in indoor experiments. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):376–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo JM, Montero J, Valiente M, Honrubia FT, Ortiz J (1999) Irrigation uniformity with medium size sprinklers. Part I: characterization of water distribution in no-wind conditions. Trans ASAE 42(3):665–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AL, Martin DL, Norman JM, Tolk JA, Howell TA, Gilley JR, Schneider AD (1997) Testing of a water loss distribution model for moving sprinkler systems. Trans ASAE 40(1):81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S, Zhu X, Li H, Ren Z (2006) Effects of complete fluidic sprinkler on hydraulic characteristics based on some important geometrical parameters. Trans CSAE 22(10):113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanon ER, Testezlaf R, Matsura EJ (2000) Data acquisition system for sprinkler uniformity testing. Appl Eng Agric 16(2):123–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Partial funding in support of this work was provided by the National Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2006AA100211) and is gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingye Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Yuan, S., Li, H. et al. Orthogonal tests and precipitation estimates for the outside signal fluidic sprinkler. Irrig Drainage Syst 23, 163–172 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-009-9084-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-009-9084-8

Keywords

Navigation