Irrigation and Drainage Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 35–44 | Cite as

A comparative analysis of rainfed and irrigated agricultural production in Ethiopia



Ethiopia’s economy is dependent on agriculture which contributes more than 50% to GDP, about 60% to foreign exchange earning and provides livelihood to more than 85% of the population. Ethiopia has a large potential of water resources that could be developed for irrigation. Despite the large water resources, Ethiopia continues to receive food aid to about 10% of the population who are at risk annually, out of a total of more than 67 million. The government of Ethiopia is committed to solving this paradox through an agricultural led development program that includes irrigation development as one of the strategies. This paper compares rainfed and irrigated agricultural production in Ethiopia. Using the stochastic production frontier approach, the study concludes that irrigation development in Ethiopia is a viable development strategy but attention needs to be paid to improving the technology available to farmers under both rainfed and irrigated production.


Agriculture Ethiopia Irrigation Paradox Stochastic Frontier 


  1. Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amare Y (1999) Household resources, strategies and food security in Ethiopia. A study of Ahmara households in Wogda, Northern Shewa. In: Monograph Series in Sociology and Anthropology, vol 1. The Department of Sociology and Social Administarition and The Addis Ababa University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Awulachew SB, Merry DJ, Kamara AB, Van Koppen B, Penning de Vries F, Boelee E, Makombe G (2005) Experiences and opportunities for promoting small-scale/micro irrigation and rainwater harvesting for food security in Ethiopia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI V 86p (Working paper 98)Google Scholar
  4. Catholic Relief Services (1999) Programmatic environmental assessment of small-scale irrigation in Ethiopia, September 1999Google Scholar
  5. Ethiopian Economic Association (1999) Annual report on the Ethiopian economyGoogle Scholar
  6. Government of the Republic of Ethiopia (1999) The Ethiopian water resources management policyGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of the Republic of Ethiopia (2001) Water sector strategy. In: Water Sector Development Programme 2002–2016. Irrigation Development Programme. Ministry of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of the Republic of Ethiopia (1998–2004) Disaster prevention and preparedness agency, early warning systems food supply prospects reports.
  9. Haileselassie A (2000) Integrated water resources development and opportunities for irrigated agriculture (Summary)Google Scholar
  10. Jondrow J, Lovell K, Materov I, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econom 19:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelemework D (2005). A comparative analysis of the technical efficiency of irrigated and rainfed agriculture in awash and rift valleys of Ethiopia. Thesis, Department of Economics, Addis Ababa UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Makombe G, Meinzen-Dick R, Davies, SP, Sampath, RK (2001) An evaluation of bani (Dambo) systems as a smallholder irrigation development strategy in Zimbabwe. Can J Agric Econ 49:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. United Nations Development Programme (2006)
  14. Werfring A (2004) Typology of irrigation in Ethiopia. Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences ViennaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Godswill Makombe
    • 1
  • Dawit Kelemework
    • 2
  • Dejene Aredo
    • 3
  1. 1.International Water Management InstituteAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.Haramaya UniversityDire DawaEthiopia
  3. 3.Addis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations