Reasons for smallholder farmers discontinuing with low-cost micro-irrigation: A case study from Kenya

Abstract

The low head drip kit (micro-irrigation) was introduced in Kenya in the late 1990s. It consists of water containers, usually a bucket or a drum(s), raised about one metre to gain gravitational head. The number and length of drip lines used vary according to the areas to be irrigated which can be as low as 15 m2. The general objective of this research was to find out why some smallholder farmers in the study areas discontinued micro-irrigation. The research was carried out in 2002 by a survey using face-to-face informal interviews with continuing adopters and those who had discontinued adoption. The study revealed that the majority of farmers who discontinued using micro-irrigation stopped due to lack of maintenance, irrelevant cultural background, and unreliable water supply. The influence of some factors seemed to vary between areas. Homogeneity analysis (SPSS) results associated farmers who discontinued the adoption of the micro-irrigation kit with above factors as well as farmers’ subsidies for acquisition of the kit, the use of the smaller bucket kit, and farmers who did not traditionally grow food crops. The findings suggest critical factors to be addressed for the continued adoption of smallholder micro-irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Benzcri, J.P. 1992. Correspondence Analysis Handbook, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kabutha, C., Blank, H. & Koppen, B. 2000. Drip irrigation for smallholder farmers in Kenya: Experience and way forward. Sixth International Micro-Irrigation Congress: Micro-Irrigation Technology for Developing Agriculture, South Africa.

  3. Kay, M. 2001. Smallholder Irrigation Technology: Prospects for Sub-Saharan Africa. Intermediate Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage, FAO Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Micheloud, F.X. 1997. Correspondence analysis. http://www.micheloud.com/FXM/CORE/E (accessed 20/9/04).

  5. Muganjwa, P.N. & Radiro, M.P. 1997. KARI transferring drip irrigation technology to small-scale farmers. The Farmer, September/October, Nairobi.

  6. Ngigi, S.N., Thome, D.W., Waweru, W. & Blank, H.G. 2000. Technical Evaluation of Low Head Drip Irrigation Technologies in Kenya. University of Nairobi and International Water Management Institute, Nairobi.

  7. Oliver, G. 1990. Marketing Today. 3rd edn., Prentice-Hall International Ltd, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovation. 4th edn., Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weller, S. & Romney, K.A. 1990. Metric Scaling-Correspondence Analysis. SAGE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winrock. 2000. Proceedings of the Low-Head Drip Irrigation Review Workshop at the National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Nairobi, February 17–18, Winrock International.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. K. Kulecho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulecho, I.K., Weatherhead, E.K. Reasons for smallholder farmers discontinuing with low-cost micro-irrigation: A case study from Kenya. Irrig Drainage Syst 19, 179–188 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-005-4419-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • drip
  • economics
  • Kenya
  • kit
  • micro-irrigation
  • small-scale/smallholder irrigation
  • technology adoption
  • trickle