Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior vitreous detachment rates post-uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery: a systematic review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is commonly accepted that phacoemulsification surgery is a risk factor for the development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and may accelerate the process. This is an important consideration particularly in cases involving young patients who pre-operatively have no PVD, given the increased risk of retinal tears and detachments.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting incidence of PVD post-uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used for search strategy. Of 3071 titles, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria; The outcomes measured were PVD occurrence by (1) time, (2) type, (3) age, (4) gender and (5) axial length, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager.

Results

A total of 2034 eyes were included for analysis with a mean follow-up time of 28.3 months. 33.3% of patients developed a PVD, either partial or complete, with rates increasing in a time dependent manner. No significant difference was noted in sub-group analysis by age, gender or axial length.

Conclusions

The results from our systematic review show that uncomplicated phacoemulsification accelerates the physiological process of PVD development. Pre-operative evaluation of the vitreoretinal interface should be performed with careful post-operative follow-up advised in those without a pre-existing PVD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayreh SS, Jonas JB (2004) Posterior vitreous detachment: clinical correlations. Ophthalmologica 218(5):333–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fincham GS, James S, Spickett C, Hollingshead M, Thrasivoulou C, Poulson AV et al (2018) Posterior vitreous detachment and the posterior hyaloid membrane. Ophthalmology 125(2):227–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuo JY, Lee TY, Hollands H, Morris AH, Reyes RC, Rossiter JD et al (2006) Risk factors for posterior vitreous detachment: a case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol 142(6):931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gishti O, van den Nieuwenhof R, Verhoekx J, van Overdam K (2019) Symptoms related to posterior vitreous detachment and the risk of developing retinal tears: a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol 97(4):347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarrafizadeh R, Hassan TS, Ruby AJ, Williams GA, Garretson BR, Capone A Jr et al (2001) Incidence of retinal detachment and visual outcome in eyes presenting with posterior vitreous separation and dense fundus-obscuring vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 108(12):2273–2278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson MW, Van Newkirk MR, Meyer KA (2001) Perifoveal vitreous detachment is the primary pathogenic event in idiopathic macular hole formation. Arch Ophthalmol 119(2):215–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Byer NE (1994) Natural history of posterior vitreous detachment with early management as the premier line of defense against retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 101(9):1503–1513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Itakura H, Kishi S (2013) Evolution of vitreomacular detachment in healthy subjects. JAMA Ophthalmol 131(10):1348–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coppé AM, Lapucci G (2008) Posterior vitreous detachment and retinal detachment following cataract extraction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19(3):239–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuzzi R, Marchese A, Gulino GR, Versino E, Ghigo D (2015) Influence of posterior vitreous detachment and type of intraocular lens on lipid peroxidation in the human vitreous. Mol Vis 21:1106–1112

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jariashvili K, Madhan B, Brodsky B, Kuchava A, Namicheishvili L, Metreveli N (2012) UV damage of collagen: insights from model collagen peptides. Biopolymers 97(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akiba J, Ueno N, Chakrabarti B (1994) Mechanisms of photo-induced vitreous liquefaction. Curr Eye Res 13(7):505–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neal RE, Bettelheim FA, Lin C, Winn KC, Garland DL, Zigler JS Jr (2005) Alterations in human vitreous humour following cataract extraction. Exp Eye Res 80(3):337–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grand MG (2003) The risk of a new retinal break or detachment following cataract surgery in eyes that had undergone repair of phakic break or detachment: a hypothesis of a causal relationship to cataract surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 101:335–369

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hikichi T, Ueno N, Chakrabarti B, Trempe CL, Yoshida A (1996) Evidence of cross-link formation of vitreous collagen during experimental ocular inflammation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234(1):47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hikichi T, Ueno N, Chakrabarti B, Trempe CL (1996) Vitreous changes during ocular inflammation induced by interleukin 1 beta. Jpn J Ophthalmol 40(3):297–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilding AC (1954) Alterations in the form, movement, and structure of the vitreous body in aphakic eyes. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 52(5):699–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Irvine AR (1985) The pathogenesis of aphakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Surg 16(2):101–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hikichi T (2012) Time course of development of posterior vitreous detachments after phacoemulsification surgery. Ophthalmology 119(10):2102–2107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hikichi T, Hirokawa H, Kado M, Akiba J, Kakehashi A, Yoshida A et al (1995) Comparison of the prevalence of posterior vitreous detachment in whites and Japanese. Ophthalmic Surg 26(1):39–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayashi S, Yoshida M, Hayashi K, Tsubota K (2021) Progression of posterior vitreous detachment after cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 36(10):1872–1877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK (1982) Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 100(2):289–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boberg-Ans G, Villumsen J, Henning V (2003) Retinal detachment after phacoemulsification cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 29(7):1333–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheu SJ, Ger LP, Ho WL (2010) Late increased risk of retinal detachment after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 149(1):113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Russell M, Gaskin B, Russell D, Polkinghorne PJ (2006) Pseudophakic retinal detachment after phacoemulsification cataract surgery: ten-year retrospective review. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(3):442–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park JH, Yang H, Kwon H, Jeon S (2021) Risk factors for onset or progression of posterior vitreous detachment at the vitreomacular interface after cataract surgery. Ophthalmol Retina 5(3):270–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivastinovic D, Pöschl EM, Schwab C, Borkenstein A, Lackner EM, Wedrich A et al (2013) Evolution of early changes at the vitreoretinal interface after cataract surgery determined by optical coherence tomography and ultrasonography. Am J Ophthalmol 155(2):404–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hilford D, Hilford M, Mathew A, Polkinghorne PJ (2009) Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 23(6):1388–1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi S, Hirata A (2022) Posterior vitreous detachment after cataract surgery in eyes with high myopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 66(2):167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was award the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) Systematic Review Award.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were involved in study conceptualization and design. DJH and PM—independently performed a literature search with MG arbitrating on any disagreement; DJH—performed statistical analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; MG and PM—reviewed and made edits to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daire J. Hurley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurley, D.J., Murtagh, P. & Guerin, M. Posterior vitreous detachment rates post-uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery: a systematic review. Int Ophthalmol 44, 155 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03091-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03091-z

Keywords

Navigation