Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early versus delayed photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) patients are sometimes referred to Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with very long-term disease. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of PDT in CSCR eyes with long-standing disease.

Methods

The medical records of the patients that underwent PDT for CSCR between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Cases were divided into two groups based on the duration of disease before PDT treatment: early treatment (3 to 6 months) and delayed treatment (longer than 6 months). The treatment was defined as successful when the subfoveal fluid was absorbed during follow-up.

Results

The PDT treatment was successful in 76% and 77% of eyes in the early and delayed treatment groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvement in central retina measurements at the 3-months follow-up which persisted to the last follow-up visit. The visual acuity (VA) at baseline was significantly worse in the delayed treatment group (0.5 ± 0.26 vs. 0.3 ± 0.24, P = 0.042) and improved in both groups but remained low in the delayed treatment group during the study.

Conclusion

We suggest that if CSCR is not spontaneously improving over 3 months the patient should be offered PDT, to prevent VA loss from the long-term presence of subretinal fluid in the macula. PDT is not associated with loss of vision in eyes with chronic CSCR, and can be safely used in eyes with relatively good VA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Efrat Gur, Gabriel Katz and Ari Leshno. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Gabriel Katz and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. You EL, Hébert M, Jin TS, Bourgault S, Caissie M, Tourville É, Chen J, Ordóñez-Mena J, Dirani A (2023) Comparing interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Dijk EHC, Feenstra HMA, Bjerager J, Grauslund J, Boon CJF, Subhi Y (2023) Comparative efficacy of treatments for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Acta Ophthalmol 101(2):140–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goté JT, Singh SR, Chhablani J (2023) Comparing treatment outcomes in randomized controlled trials of central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-05996-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva RM, Ruiz-Moreno JM, Gomez-Ulla F, Montero JA, Gregório T, Cachulo ML, Pires IA, Cunha-Vaz JG, Murta JN (2013) Photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a 4-year follow-up study. Retina 33(2):309–315. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182670fbe

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smretschnig E, Ansari-Shahrezaei S, Hagen S, Glittenberg C, Krebs I, Binder S (2013) Half-fluence photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 33(2):316–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318280769c

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erikitola OC, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Lotery AJ, Sivaprasad S (2014) Photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 28(8):944–957. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita K, Imamura Y, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, Mizutani Y (2015) One-year outcomes with half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 122(3):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheptulin V, Purtskhvanidze K, Roider J (2018) Half-time photodynamic therapy in treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256(11):2027–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4086-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolò M, Desideri LF, Vagge A, Traverso CE (2020) Current pharmacological treatment options for central serous chorioretinopathy: a review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 13(10):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13100264.PMID:32977380;PMCID:PMC7597965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashizume K, Mizota A, Lim JI, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Chakravarthy U, Flaxel CJ, Spaide RF (2014) Macula society CSC collaborative study group, research and education committee and website committee. Collaborative retrospective macula society study of photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 121(5):1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicoló M, Eandi CM, Alovisi C, Grignolo FM, Traverso CE, Musetti D, CardilloPiccolino F (2014) Half-fluence versus half-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 157(5):1033–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alkin Z, Perente I, Ozkaya A, Alp D, Agca A, Aygit ED, Korkmaz S, Yazici AT, Demirok A (2014) Comparison of efficacy between low-fluence and half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol 5(8):685–690. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S58617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YK, Ryoo NK, Woo SJ, Park KH (2015) Comparison of visual and anatomical outcomes of half-fluence and half-dose photodynamic therapy in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(12):2063–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2926-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiode Y, Morizane Y, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Kawata T, Doi S, Hosogi M, Fujiwara A, Shiraga F (2015) Comparison of halving the irradiation time or the verteporfin dose for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 35(12):2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu HY, Yang CH, Yang CM, Ho TC, Lin CP, Hsieh YT (2016) Half-dose versus half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 167:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng CK, Chang CK, Peng CH (2017) Comparison of photodynamic therapy using half dose of verteporfin or half-fluence of laser light for the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 37(2):325–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haga F, Maruko R, Sato C, Kataoka K, Ito Y, Terasaki H (2017) Long-term prognostic factors of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy after half-dose photodynamic therapy: a 3-year follow-up study. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0181479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Matušková V, Vysloužilová D, Uher M (2018) Half-Fluence photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: predisposing factors for visual acuity outcomes. Semin Ophthalmol 33(5):690–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung CY, Chan YY, Li KKW (2018) Angiographic and tomographic prognostic factors of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy treated with half-dose photodynamic therapy. Ophthalmologica 240(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EHC, Dijkman G, Boon CJF (2018) Clinical characteristics of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients with insufficient response to reduced-settings photodynamic therapy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256(8):1395–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4003-z. (Epub 2018 May 7)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Asano KS, Asaoka R, Asano S, Azuma K, Inoue T, Obata R (2020) Elongated photoreceptor outer segment length and prognosis of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 40(4):750–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dijk EHC, Fauser S, Breukink MB, Blanco-Garavito R, Groenewoud JMM, Keunen JEE, Peters PJH, Dijkman G, Souied EH, MacLaren RE et al (2018) Half-dose photodynamic therapy versus high-density subthreshold micropulse laser treatment in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: the PLACE trial. Ophthalmology 125(10):1547–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EHC, Yzer S, Ohno-Matsui K, Keunen JEE, Schlingemann RO, Sivaprasad S, Querques G, Downes SM, Fauser S et al (2019) Central serous chorioretinopathy: towards an evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res 73:100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lotery A, Sivaprasad S, O’Connell A, Harris RA, Culliford L, Ellis L, Cree A, Madhusudhan S, Behar-Cohen F, Chakravarthy U, on behalf of the VICI trial investigators et al (2020) Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 395(10220):294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Missotten TO, Hoddenbach JG, Eenhorst AE, van den Born LI, Martinez Ciriano JP, Wubbels RJ (2021) A randomized clinical trial comparing prompt photodynamic therapy with 3 months observation in patients with acute central serous chorioretinopathy with central macular leakage. Eur J Ophthalmol. 31(3):1248–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120915168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liew G, Quin G, Gillies M, Fraser-Bell S (2013) Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: a Review of Epidemiology and Pathophysiology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41(2):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02848.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X, Zhuang X, Dong J, Fu B, Xu L (2022) Factors for recurrence in acute central serous chorioretinopathy patients underwent one-third dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 39:102984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mrejen S, Balaratnasingam C, Kaden TR et al (2019) Long-term visual outcomes and causes of vision loss in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology 126(4):576–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reibaldi M, Boscia F, Avitabile T, Russo A, Cannemi V, Uva MG, Reibaldi A (2009) Low-fluence photodynamic therapy in longstanding chronic central serous chorioretinopathy with foveal and gravitational atrophy. Eur J Ophthalmol 19(1):154–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Caccavale A, Imparato M, Romanazzi F, Negri A, Porta A, Ferentini F (2009) A new strategy of treatment with low-dosage acetyl salicylic acid in patients affected by central serous chorioretinopathy. Med Hypotheses 73(3):435–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arora S, Maltsev DS, Sahoo NK, Parameshwarappa DC, Iovino C, Arora T et al (2022) Visual acuity correlates with multimodal imaging-based categories of central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 36(3):517–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01788-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Iacono P, Tedeschi M, Boccassini B, Chiaravalloti A, Varano M, Parravano M (2019) Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: early and late morphological and functional changes after verteporfin photodynamic therapy. Retina 39(5):980–987. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumashiro S, Takagi S, Itokawa T, Tajima A, Kobayashi T, Hori Y (2021) Decrease in choroidal blood flow after half and one-third dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 21(1):241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01980-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Scholz P, Altay L, Fauser S (2017) A review of subthreshold micropulse laser for treatment of macular disorders. Adv Ther 34:1528–1555

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Feenstra HMA, Diederen RMH, Lamme MJCM, Tsonaka R, Fauser S, Yzer S et al (2023) Increasing evidence for the safety of fovea-involving half-dose photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 43(3):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003686. (Epub 2023 Jan 2)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Altinel MG, Kanra AY, GedarTotuk OM, Ardagil A, Kabadayi K (2021) Comparison of half-dose versus half-fluence versus standard photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 33:102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Katz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial conflict of interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Sheba Medical Center (No. 623-19-SMC).

Consent to participate

This was a retrospective study on electronic data. There was no intervention within the study; and therefore, informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katz, G., Gur, E., Moisseiev, J. et al. Early versus delayed photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Int Ophthalmol 43, 4055–4065 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02822-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02822-y

Keywords

Navigation