Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of 2 different phakic intraocular lens implant in keratoconus as an isolated procedure or combined with collagen crosslinking and intra-stromal corneal ring segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of phakic intra-ocular lenses in isolation or in combination with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and/or intra-stromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus.

Methods

Data extracted from the publications meeting the selection. The outcome parameters included mean pre- and post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere and cylinder of refraction and complications. Available data analyzed with Cochrane Review Manager.

Results

A total of 23 studies including 464 eyes were included. All the parameters showed significant improvement in all subgroups other than CDVA in ACPIOL + CXL subgroup and cylinder in PIOL + CXL subgroups. There was not a significant difference between PCPIOL and ACPIOL in the outcomes, exception was more improvement of CDVA in “ACPIOL only” than” PCPIOL only” subgroup.

Conclusion

Both PCPIOLs and ACPIOLs are comparably safe and efficient options in management of KCN and their efficacy significantly improves when combined with CXL/ICRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ormonde S (2013) Refractive surgery for keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 96(2):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Esteve-Taboada JJ, Dominguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Alfonso JF, Montes-Mico R (2017) Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses to improve visual outcomes in keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(1):115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raiskup F, Spoerl E (2013) Corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A. Part II. Clinical indications and results. Ocul Surf 11(2):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2013.01.003

  4. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T (2003) Endothelial cell damage after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A treatment in the rabbit. J Cataract Refract Surg 29(9):1786–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00343-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGhee CN, Kim BZ, Wilson PJ (2015) Contemporary treatment paradigms in keratoconus. Cornea 34(Suppl 10):S16-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Espandar L, Meyer J (2010) Keratoconus: overview and update on treatment. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 17(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.61212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maloney RK, Nguyen LH, John ME (2002) Artisan phakic intraocular lens for myopia: short-term results of a prospective, multicenter study. Ophthalmology 109(9):1631–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01170-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Packer M (2018) The implantable collamer lens with a central port: review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol 12:2427–2438. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S188785

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocova H, Vlkova E, Michalcova L, Rybarova N, Motyka O Incidence of cataract following implantation of a posterior-chamber phakic lens ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens)—long-term results. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 73(3):87–93

  10. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Kobashi H, Igarashi A, Komatsu M, Nakamura A, Kojima T, Nakamura T (2015) Three-year follow-up of posterior chamber toric phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of high myopic astigmatism in eyes with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 99(2):177–183. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alio JL, Pena-Garcia P, Abdulla GF, Zein G, Abu-Mustafa SK (2014) Comparison of iris-claw and posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(3):383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato N, Toda I, Hori-Komai Y, Sakai C, Arai H, Tsubota K (2011) Phakic intraocular lens for keratoconus. Ophthalmology 118(3):605–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.043

  13. Hashemian SJ, Saiepoor N, Ghiasian L, Aghai H, Jafari ME, Alemzadeh SP, Hashemian MS, Hashemian SM (2018) Long-term outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 101(5):652–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. He C, Joergensen JS, Knorz MC, McKay KN, Zhang F (2020) Three-step treatment of keratoconus and post-LASIK Ectasia: implantation of ICRS, corneal cross-linking, and implantation of toric posterior chamber phakic IOLs. J Refract Surg 36(2):104–109. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20191217-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sedaghat M, Ansari-Astaneh MR, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Davis SW, Sikder S (2011) Artisan iris-supported phakic IOL implantation in patients with keratoconus: a review of 16 eyes. J Refract Surg 27(7):489–493. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110203-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venter J (2009) Artisan phakic intraocular lens in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 25(9):759–764. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090813-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Antonios R, Dirani A, Fadlallah A, Chelala E, Hamade A, Cherfane C, Jarade E (2015) Safety and Visual Outcome of Visian Toric ICL implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: up to 2 years of follow-up. J Ophthalmol 2015:514834. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/514834

  18. Kurian M, Nagappa S, Bhagali R, Shetty R, Shetty BK (2012) Visual quality after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(6):1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.12.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernandez-Vega L, Madrid-Costa D, Poo-Lopez A, Montes-Mico R (2011) Intrastromal corneal ring segments and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for keratoconus correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(4):706–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alfonso JF, Palacios A, Montes-Mico R (2008) Myopic phakic STAAR collamer posterior chamber intraocular lenses for keratoconus. J Refract Surg 24(9):867–874. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20081101-03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Budo C, Bartels MC, van Rij G (2005) Implantation of Artisan toric phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of astigmatism and spherical errors in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 21(3):218–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krauzlis RJ, Miles FA (1998) Role of the oculomotor vermis in generating pursuit and saccades: effects of microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 80(4):2046–2062. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.2046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Budo C, Hessloehl JC, Izak M, Luyten GP, Menezo JL, Sener BA, Tassignon MJ, Termote H, Worst JG (2000) Multicenter study of the Artisan phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 26(8):1163–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00545-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SW, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH (2013) Partial visual rehabilitation using a toric implantable collamer lens in a patient with keratoconus: a case report with 20 months of follow-up. Korean J Ophthalmol 27(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2013.27.3.211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Lisa C, Fernandes P, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Montes-Mico R (2010) Collagen copolymer toric posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens in eyes with keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(6):906–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kymionis GD, Grentzelos MA, Portaliou DM, Kankariya VP, Randleman JB (2014) Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) combined with refractive procedures for the treatment of corneal ectatic disorders: CXL plus. J Refract Surg 30(8):566–576. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140711-10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vastardis I, Sagri D, Fili S, Wolfelschneider P, Kohlhaas M (2019) Current trends in modern visual intraocular lens enhancement surgery in stable keratoconus: a synopsis of Do’s Don’ts and Pitfalls. Ophthalmol Ther 8(Suppl 1):33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00212-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Tuwairqi WS, Osuagwu UL, Razzouk H, AlHarbi A, Ogbuehi KC (2017) Clinical evaluation of two types of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) for keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 37(5):1185–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0385-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elsaftawy HS, Ahmed MH, Saif MY, Mousa R (2015) Sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation and corneal transepithelial collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. Cornea 34(11):1420–1426. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shafik Shaheen M, El-Kateb M, El-Samadouny MA, Zaghloul H (2014) Evaluation of a toric implantable collamer lens after corneal collagen crosslinking in treatment of early-stage keratoconus: 3-year follow-up. Cornea 33(5):475–480. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fadlallah A, Dirani A, El Rami H, Cherfane G, Jarade E (2013) Safety and visual outcome of Visian toric ICL implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. J Refract Surg 29(2):84–89. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130117-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guell JL, Morral M, Malecaze F, Gris O, Elies D, Manero F (2012) Collagen crosslinking and toric iris-claw phakic intraocular lens for myopic astigmatism in progressive mild to moderate keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(3):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Izquierdo L Jr, Henriquez MA, McCarthy M (2011) Artiflex phakic intraocular lens implantation after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconic eyes. J Refract Surg 27(7):482–487. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20101223-02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. El-Massry AA, Dowidar AM, Massoud TH, Tadros BGD (2017) Evaluation of the effect of corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus on the ocular higher-order aberrations. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1461–1469. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S142167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kosekahya P, Koc M, Tekin K, Uzel M, Atilgan CU, Caglayan M, Yilmazbas P (2017) Evaluation of the shifting of the line of sight and higher order aberrations of eyes with keratoconus after corneal cross-linking. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 40(5):311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abdelmassih Y, El-Khoury S, Chelala E, Slim E, Cherfan CG, Jarade E (2017) Toric ICL implantation after sequential intracorneal ring segments implantation and corneal cross-linking in keratoconus: 2-year follow-up. J Refract Surg 33(9):610–616. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170621-02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferreira TB, Guell JL, Manero F (2014) Combined intracorneal ring segments and iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens for keratoconus refractive and visual improvement. J Refract Surg 30(5):336–341. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140319-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dirani A, Fadlallah A, Khoueir Z, Antoun J, Cherfan G, Jarade E (2014) Visian toric ICL implantation after intracorneal ring segments implantation and corneal collagen crosslinking in keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol 24(3):338–344. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Coskunseven E, Sharma DP, Jankov MR 2nd, Kymionis GD, Richoz O, Hafezi F (2013) Collagen copolymer toric phakic intraocular lens for residual myopic astigmatism after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation and corneal collagen crosslinking in a 3-stage procedure for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(5):722–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Navas A, Tapia-Herrera G, Jaimes M, Graue-Hernandez EO, Gomez-Bastar A, Ramirez-Luquin T, Ramirez-Miranda A (2012) Implantable collamer lenses after intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 32(5):423–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9582-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moshirfar M, Fenzl CR, Meyer JJ, Neuffer MC, Espandar L, Mifflin MD (2011) Simultaneous and sequential implantation of intacs and verisyse phakic intraocular lens for refractive improvement in keratectasia. Cornea 30(2):158–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181eeb0dd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. El-Raggal TM, Abdel Fattah AA (2007) Sequential Intacs and Verisyse phakic intraocular lens for refractive improvement in keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(6):966–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kang MJ, Byun YS, Yoo YS, Whang WJ, Joo CK (2019) Long-term outcome of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus: Five-year follow up. Sci Rep 9(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36668-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Navarrete Arguello J, Bello Lopez Portillo H, Cantero Vergara MA, Sierra Acevedo GA, Ruiz Salgado K, Nieto Aguilar MV, Aguilar Perez MA, Ramos Hernandez SY, Zaragoza Herrera A, de la Torre Tovar JD (2019) Intraocular pressure fluctuations in patients implanted with an implantable collamer lens (ICL V4c). Three-month follow-up. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 94(8):367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2019.05.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Packer M (2016) Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1059–1077. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S111620

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Abdullah AA, Al-Falah MA, Al-Rasheed SA, Khandekar R, Suarez E, Arevalo JF (2015) Retinal complications after anterior versus posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in a myopic cohort. J Refract Surg 31(12):814–819. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20151111-05

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stulting RD, John ME, Maloney RK, Assil KK, Arrowsmith PN, Thompson VM, Group USVS (2008) Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation. Results of the United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 115(3):464–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.039

  48. Guell JL, Vazquez M, Malecaze F, Manero F, Gris O, Velasco F, Hulin H, Pujol J (2003) Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens for the correction of high astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 136(3):442–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00295-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ali Mahdavi Fard, Sangita P. Patel and Nader D. Nader. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ali Mahdavi Fard and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader D. Nader.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent to participate

No human subject involved in the study.

Consent to publish

No human subject involved in the study.

Ethics approval

The study did not involve human or animal subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fard, A.M., Patel, S.P. & Nader, N.D. The efficacy of 2 different phakic intraocular lens implant in keratoconus as an isolated procedure or combined with collagen crosslinking and intra-stromal corneal ring segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 43, 4383–4393 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02813-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02813-z

Keywords

Navigation