Skip to main content
Log in

The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire in a sample of the Gazan population: a study from Palestine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop an Arabic version of OSDI for the Gazan population.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a convenience sample technique. The translation procedure included five stages: forward translation, revision of translation, backward translation, refinement of translation, and a final test of the pre-final version. The final sets of questionnaires were constructed using an online JotForm platform. The online platform was chosen to automatically calculate the questionnaire’s final overall score. Overall, 260 participants were instructed to fill out the English and the Arab-OSDI version twice to conduct the reliability of the translated version and repeatability evaluation.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 33.45 ± 11.74 years old. Cronbach’s alpha for all items was greater than 0.80, except for the “blurred vision” and “deteriorating vision” items (0.77 and 0.74, respectively). The mean overall score difference between the English-OSDI and Arab-OSDI was 0.86 based on the Bland–Altman chart. For repeatability, no significant difference in the overall scores between the two repeats of the Arab-OSDI (p = 0.632). The Arab-OSDI overall score (sessions 1 and 2) has a clinical difference (bias) of 0.21. Using the varimax rotation method, only three factors (ocular symptoms, vision-related function, and environmental triggers) had eigenvalues greater than one in the structure of the Arab-OSDI.

Conclusion

The Arab-OSDI is an appropriate, reliable, and repeatable tool for the determination of dry eye symptoms, ocular discomfort, and quality of life in the Gazan population. This version could remove the language barrier in answering OSDI items more easily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pakdel F, Gohari M, Jazayeri A, Amani A, Pirmarzdashti N, Aghaee H (2017) Validation of farsi translation of the ocular surface disease index. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. https://doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_92_16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Okumura Y, Inomata T, Iwata N, Sung J, Fujimoto K, Fujio K, Midorikawa-Inomata A, Miura M, Akasaki Y, Murakami A (2020) A review of dry eye questionnaires: measuring patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Diagnostics 10:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grubbs JR, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Huynh K, Davis RM (2014) A review of quality of life measures in dry eye questionnaires. Cornea 33:215–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000038

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL (2000) Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 118:615–621. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.5.615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson D, Tauber J, Reis BL (2000) Efficacy and safety of cyclosporin a ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a dose-ranging, randomized trial. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00035-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang KC, Oh JY, In YS, Kim MK, Shin KC, Wee WR, Lee JH, Park MG (2009) Preliminary effects of oral uridine on the ocular surface in dry eye patients. J Korean Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rossi GCM, Tinelli C, Pasinetti GM, Milano G, Bianchi PE (2009) Dry eye syndrome-related quality of life in glaucoma patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210901900409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dougherty BE, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK (2011) Rasch analysis of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vitale S, Goodman LA, Reed GF, Smith JA (2004) Comparison of the NEI-VFQ and OSDI questionnaires in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome-related dry eye. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson TL, Situ P, Jones LW, Fonn D (2008) Dry eye symptoms assessed by four questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci 85:E692–E699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith JA, Albenz J, Begley C, Caffery B, Nichols K, Schaumberg D, Schein O (2007) The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop (2007). In Ocular surface

  12. Prigol AM, Tenório MB, Matschinske R, Gehlen ML, Skare T (2012) Translation and validation of ocular surface disease index to portuguese [Tradução e validação do índice da doença da superfície ocular para a língua portuguesa]. Arq Bras Oftalmol

  13. Beltran F, Ramos Betancourt N, Martinez J, Santacruz Valdes C, Babayan A, Ramírez-Assad C, Mora Juarez E, Hernandez-Quintela E (2013) Transcultural validation of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire for mexican population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(15):6050

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abd Rahman AA, Badarudin NE, Azemin MZC, Ariffin AE (2017) Development of a Bahasa Melayu version of ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Int J Allied Heal Sci 1

  15. Lu F, Tao A, Hu Y, Tao W, Lu P (2018) Evaluation of reliability and validity of three common dry eye questionnaires in Chinese. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2401213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Marie F, Roa-Lingad DC, Lim R, Siong B (2018) Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of a Filipino dry eye screening questionnaire. Philipp J Ophthalmol Orig Artic 43:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  17. Midorikawa-Inomata A, Inomata T, Nojiri S, Nakamura M, Iwagami M, Fujimoto K, Okumura Y, Iwata N, Eguchi A, Hasegawa H, Kinouchi H, Murakami A, Kobayashi H (2019) Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ocular surface disease index for dry eye disease. BMJ Open 9:e033940. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bakkar MM, El-Sharif AK, Al Qadire M (2021) Validation of the Arabic version of the ocular surface disease index questionnaire. Int J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.10.18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Aljarousha MA, Badarudin NE, Che Azemin MZ, Aljeesh Y, Abuimara A (2021) A systematic review on prevalence, risk factors, clinical diagnosis and medical management of dry eye disease in the Arab population. Afr Vis Eye Health. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v80i1.591

  20. Ksiaa I, Kechida M, Ben Tkhayat S, El Mhamdi S, Abroug N, Khairallah M (2021) Cross-validation of the Tunisian version of the national eye institute visual function questionnaire 25. J Fr Ophtalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.01.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shanti Y, Shehada R, Bakkar MM, Qaddumi J (2020) Prevalence and associated risk factors of dry eye disease in 16 northern West bank towns in Palestine: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1290-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rouquette A, Falissard B (2011) Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. UNICEF Data (2022) Literacy Rates. https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/learning-and-skills/

  26. UNESCO Data (2022) Palestine education and literacy. http://uis.unesco.org/en/country/ps?theme=education-and-literacy

  27. Keeley JW, Webb C, Peterson D, Roussin L, Flanagan EH (2016) Development of a response inconsistency scale for the personality inventory for DSM–5. J Pers Assess 98:351–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Santo RM, Ribeiro-Ferreira F, Alves MR, Epstein J, Novaes P (2015) Enhancing the cross-cultural adaptation and validation process: Linguistic and psychometric testing of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of a self-report measure for dry eye. J Clin Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koh S, Chalmers R, Kabata D, Shintani A, Nishida K (2019) Translation and validation of the 8-item contact lens dry eye questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) among Japanese soft contact lens wearers: the J-CLDEQ-8. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. World Population Review Data (2022) Palestine population. https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/palestine-population

Download references

Acknowledgements

The researchers would like to specially thank all the Gazan participants who agreed to fill out the consent, original, and translated Arab-OSDI online.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by MA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Zulfaezal Che Azemin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical standard

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Palestinian Health Research Council Helsinki committee (PHRC/HC/883/21, dated April 05, 2021).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aljarousha, M., Badarudin, N.E., Che Azemin, M.Z. et al. The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire in a sample of the Gazan population: a study from Palestine. Int Ophthalmol 43, 1303–1316 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02528-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02528-7

Keywords

Navigation