Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the conjunctivochalasis accompanied by pseudoexfoliation syndrome affect the ocular surface and anterior segment structures?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The probability of the coexistence of conjunctivochalasis and pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PES) in the same individual may increase with aging. We investigated the effects of conjunctivochalasis accompanied by PES on the ocular surface (OS) and anterior segment (AS) structures.

Methods

Cases with only conjunctivochalasis were determined as Group 1 (n = 62), cases with conjunctivochalasis accompanied by PES as Group 2 (n = 45), and healthy individuals as Group 3 (n = 56). The OS and AS parameters of the groups were compared.

Results

There were a higher grade-3 conjunctivochalasis rate (17.7% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.039), a greater “mean grade of conjunctivochalasis” value (1.72 ± 0.24 vs. 2.29 ± 0.32, p = 0.036), and a higher “total conjunctivochalasis score” (4.27 ± 1.13 vs. 6.12 ± 1.35, p = 0.025) in Group 2 than in Group 1. Additionally, Group 2 had a shorter tear film break-up time (TBUT) (9.17 ± 2.53 vs. 5.41 ± 1.32, p = 0.010) and a greater OS disease index (OSDI) score (16.28 ± 3.15 vs. 27.36 ± 4.12, p = 0.037) than Group 1. Moreover, both Group 1 and Group 2 had shorter TBUTs (Group 1–3: p = 0.004; Group 2–3: p < 0.001) and greater OSDI scores (Group 1–3: p = 0.042; Group 2–3: p = 0.019) compared to Group 3. The groups’ ocular surface staining scores, Schirmer 1 tests, central corneal thicknesses, keratometries, axial lengths, anterior chamber depths, lens thicknesses, and intraocular pressures were similar (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this was the first study comprehensively investigating the effects of conjunctivochalasis accompanied by PES on the OS and AS structures together. We found that conjunctivochalasis might cause the OS disease, while the presence of PES in conjunctivochalasis cases might worsen both the OS disease and conjunctivochalasis findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marmalidou A, Kheirkhah A, Dana R (2018) Conjunctivochalasis: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 63(4):554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gan JY, Li QS, Zhang ZY, Zhang W, Zhang XR (2017) The role of elastic fibers in pathogenesis of conjunctivochalasis. Int J Ophthalmol 10(9):1465–1473. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2017.09.21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Meller D, Li DQ, Tseng SC (2000) Regulation of collagenase, stromelysin, and gelatinase B in human conjunctival and conjunctivochalasis fibroblasts by interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(10):2922–2929

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiang MH, Zhang XR, Zhang ZY, Li QS, Wang HM, Han ZM, Zhou HM, Jia YL, Chen XX (2017) Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 and their tissue inhibitors in the conjunctival tissue and fibroblasts cultured from conjunctivochalasis. Int J Ophthalmol 10(4):555–559. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2017.04.09

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Meller D, Tseng SC (1998) Conjunctivochalasis: literature review and possible pathophysiology. Surv Ophthalmol 43(3):225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(98)00037-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li DQ, Meller D, Liu Y, Tseng SC (2000) Overexpression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 by cultured conjunctivochalasis fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(2):404–410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acera A, Vecino E, Duran JA (2013) Tear MMP-9 levels as a marker of ocular surface inflammation in conjunctivochalasis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(13):8285–8291. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO (2006) Ocular and systemic pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 141(5):921–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghaffari Sharaf M, Amidian S, Rathod V, Crichton A, Damji KF, Wille H, Unsworth LD (2020) Structural polymorphisms in fibrillar aggregates associated with exfoliation syndrome. Sci RepSep 10(1):15860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72737-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yildirim Z, Yildirim F, Uçgun NI, Sepici-Dinçel A (2013) The role of the cytokines in the pathogenesis of pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Int J Ophthalmol 6(1):50–53. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.01.10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. SarenacVulovic T, Pavlovic S, Lutovac M, Zdravkovic V, Sreckovic S, Zdravkovic N (2019) Regulatory cytokines prescribe the outcome of the inflammation in the process of pseudoexfoliation production. J Chin Med Assoc 82(12):935–940. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zenkel M, Lewczuk P, Jünemann A, Kruse FE, Naumann GO, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U (2010) Proinflammatory cytokines are involved in the initiation of the abnormal matrix process in pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma. Am J Pathol 176(6):2868–2879. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.090914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Lommatzsch J, Küchle M, Konstas AG, Naumann GO (2003) Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aqueous humor of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(3):1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kocabeyoǧlu S, Irkeç M, Orhan M, Mocan MC (2012) Evaluation of the ocular surface parameters in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and conjunctivochalasis. Turk J Ophthalmol 42(5):332–335. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.42.392000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mimura T, Yamagami S, Usui T, Funatsu H, Mimura Y, Noma H, Honda N, Amano S (2009) Changes of conjunctivochalasis with age in a hospital-based study. Am J Ophthalmol 147(1):171-177.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang X, Li Q, Zou H, Peng J, Shi C, Zhou H, Zhang G, Xiang M, Li Y (2011) Assessing the severity of conjunctivochalasis in a senile population: a community-based epidemiology study in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health 11:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. You QS, Xu L, Wang YX, Yang H, Ma K, Li JJ, Zhang L, Jonas JB (2013) Pseudoexfoliation: normative data and associations: the Beijing eye study 2011. Ophthalmology 120(8):1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moghimi S, Mazloumi M, Johari MK, Fard MA, Chen R, Weinreb R, Nouri-Mahdavi K (2017) Comparison of macular choroidal thickness in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome to normal control subjects with enhanced depth SD-OCT imaging. J Curr Ophthalmol 29(4):258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.06.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mimura T, Iida M, Oshima R, Noma H, Kamei Y, Goto M, Kondo A, Matsubara M (2017) Changes of conjunctivochalasis after cataract surgery via a superior transconjunctival sclerocorneal incision. Int Ophthalmol 37(3):691–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0328-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mimura T, Usui T, Yamagami S, Funatsu H, Noma H, Toyono T, Mori M, Amano S (2011) Relationship between conjunctivochalasis and refractive error. Eye Contact Lens 37(2):71–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e31820ca377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA (2003) Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 22(7):640–650. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eom Y, Lee JS, Keun Lee H, Myung Kim H, Suk Song J (2015) Comparison of conjunctival staining between lissamine green and yellow filtered fluorescein sodium. Can J Ophthalmol 50(4):273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Begley C, Caffery B, Chalmers R, Situ P, Simpson T, Nelson JD (2019) Review and analysis of grading scales for ocular surface staining. Ocul Surf 17(2):208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2019.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li N, Deng XG, He MF (2012) Comparison of the Schirmer I test with and without topical anesthesia for diagnosing dry eye. Int J Ophthalmol 5(4):478–481. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.04.14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, Djalilian A, Dogru M, Dumbleton K, Gupta PK, Karpecki P, Lazreg S, Pult H, Sullivan BD, Tomlinson A, Tong L, Villani E, Yoon KC, Jones L, Craig JP (2017) TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf 15(3):539–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozek D, Karaca EE, Evren Kemer O (2020) The effect of conjunctivochalasis detected by anterior segment optical coherence tomography on tear function in an elderly population. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 12:2515841420930876. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515841420930876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Dogru M, Matsumoto Y, Ward SK, Ayako I, Hu Y, Okada N, Ogawa Y, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (2007) The impact of nasal conjunctivochalasis on tear functions and ocular surface findings. Am J Ophthalmol 144(6):930–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Noori S, Sati A, Moulick PS, Kaushik J, Shankar S, Bose R (2020) Tear film abnormalities in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and normal healthy participants: a comparative analysis. Med J Armed Forces India 76(3):303–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV, Naoumidi II, Siganos CS, Detorakis ET, Pallikaris LG (2004) Study of conjunctival goblet cell morphology and tear film stability in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242(6):478–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0865-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Q, Cui X, Xiang J, Ge L, Gong L, Xu J (2014) Impact of conjunctivochalasis on visual quality of life: a community population survey. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mimura T, Yamagami S, Kamei Y, Goto M, Matsubara M (2013) Influence of axial length on conjunctivochalasis. Cornea 32(8):1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318292b7a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Doganay S, Tasar A, Cankaya C, Firat PG, Yologlu S (2012) Evaluation of Pentacam-Scheimpflug imaging of anterior segment parameters in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 95(2):218–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00691.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Inoue K, Okugawa K, Oshika T, Amano S (2003) Morphological study of corneal endothelium and corneal thickness in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 47(3):235–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-5155(03)00022-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Puska P, Vasara K, Harju M, Setälä K (2000) Corneal thickness and corneal endothelium in normotensive subjects with unilateral exfoliation syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(8):659–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170000159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Palko JR, Qi O, Sheybani A (2017) Corneal Alterations Associated with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Glaucoma: A Literature Review. J Ophthalm Vis Res 12(3):312–324. https://doi.org/10.4103/jovr.jovr_28_17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gumus K, Pflugfelder SC (2013) Increasing prevalence and severity of conjunctivochalasis with aging detected by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 155(2):238-242.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Bediz Özen] and [Hakan Öztürk]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Bediz Özen] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bediz Özen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was performed with the approval of Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital's Medical Research Ethical Committee (approval number: 2020/10–10) and in-line with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özen, B., Öztürk, H. Does the conjunctivochalasis accompanied by pseudoexfoliation syndrome affect the ocular surface and anterior segment structures?. Int Ophthalmol 42, 3079–3087 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02294-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02294-6

Keywords

Navigation