Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical outcomes of phakic, pseudophakic and combined phaco-trabeculectomy in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of phakic, pseudophakic and combined phaco-trabeculectomy in eyes of Saudi patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Eyes of patients with primary open angle glaucoma, primary angle closure glaucoma or secondary exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) that underwent phakic (n = 152), pseudophakic (n = 40) or combined phaco-trabeculectomy (n = 45) at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh from January 2012 to December 2017 were included. The primary outcome measure was the success at 3 years after surgery. Complete success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥ 6 and ≤ 21 mmHg without topical antiglaucoma medications; qualified success as achieving the same IOP criteria with or without the use of glaucoma medications. Cumulative probabilities of failure were computed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. We used Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with treatment failure. Reduction in mean IOP and AGM over time was estimated using mixed-effects linear models.

Results

The mean decrease in IOP at 3 years from baseline in the phakic, pseudophakic and combined groups was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9, 14.1) mmHg, 10.1 (95% 6.3, 13.9) mmHg, and 6.4 (95% CI, 1.9, 11.0) mmHg, respectively, and was not significantly different from each other. The values for qualified success were also comparable: 95.2% (95% CI: 86.7–99.0), 95.3% (95% CI: 76.2–99.9), 92.3% (95% CI: 64.0–99.8). Failure was significantly associated with postoperative suturelysis (p = 0.004), XFG (p = 0.018) and AGM (p = 0.038).

Conclusions

This is the first study to provide relative surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy, phaco-trabeculectomy and pseudophakic trabeculectomy in Saudi Arabia and did not show any significant difference in terms of overall success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data can be made available subject to IRB permission at irb@kkesh.med.sa.

References

  1. Allingham R, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Rhee DJ (2010) Shields textbook of glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

  2. Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Hitchings RA, Crowston JG (2014) Glaucoma [e-book], 2nd edn. Elsevier/Saunders, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66(4):673–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fontana H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J (2006) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes and risk factors for failure. Am J Ophthalmol 141(4):652–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadway DC, Grierson I, Hitchings RA (1998) Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 125(6):805–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontana H, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Lumba J, Ralli M, Caprioli J (2006) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C: outcomes and risk factors for failure in phakic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113(6):930–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Law SK, Shih K, Tran DH, Coleman AL, Caprioli J (2009) Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 148(5):685e1-695e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Supawavej C, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Law SK, Caprioli J (2013) Comparison of results of initial trabeculectomy with mitomycin C after prior clear-corneal phacoemulsification to outcomes in phakic eyes. J Glaucoma 22(1):52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takihara Y, Inatani M, Seto T, Iwao K, Iwao M, Inoue T et al (2011) Trabeculectomy with mitomycin for open-angle glaucoma in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol 129(2):152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross RL, Feldman RM, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC, Spiegel D, Katz LJ et al (1988) Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology 95(9):1195–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellows AR, Johnstone MA (1983) Surgical management of chronic glaucoma in aphakia. Ophthalmology 90(7):807–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shingleton BJ, Alfano C, O’Donoghue MW, Rivera J (2004) Efficacy of glaucoma filtration surgery in pseudophakic patients with or without conjunctival scarring. J Cataract Refract Surg 30(12):2504–2509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caprioli J, Park HJ, Weitzman M (1996) Temporal corneal phacoemulsification combined with superior trabeculectomy: a controlled study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 94:451–463 (discussion 63–68)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eid TM (2008) Combined viscocanalostomy–trabeculectomy for management of far-advanced glaucoma: evaluation of the early postoperative course. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39(5):358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. El Sayyad F, Helal M, El-Kholify H, Khalil M, El-Maghraby A (2000) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107(9):1671–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El Sayyad F, Helal M, El-Maghraby A, Khalil M, El-Hamzawey H (1999) One-site versus 2-site phacotrabeculectomy: a randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 25(1):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Sayyad FF, Helal MH, Khalil MM, El-Maghraby MA (1999) Phacotrabeculectomy versus two-stage operation: a matched study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30(4):260–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P (2012) A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 119(4):694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL et al (2012) Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153(5):789e2-803e2

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaarawy T, Sherwood M, Grehn F (2009) World Glaucoma Association (WGA): guidelines on design and reporting of glaucoma surgical trials. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  21. Song BJ, Ramanathan M, Morales E, Law SK, Giaconi JA, Coleman AL et al (2016) Trabeculectomy and combined phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy: outcomes and risk factors for failure in primary angle closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma 25(9):763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takihara Y, Inatani M, Ogata-Iwao M, Kawai M, Inoue T, Iwao K et al (2014) Trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in phakic eyes vs in pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification: a prospective clinical cohort study. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(1):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai HY, Liu CJ, Cheng CY (2009) Combined trabeculectomy and cataract extraction versus trabeculectomy alone in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 93(7):943–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Derick RJ, Evans J, Baker ND (1998) Combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone: a comparison study using mitomycin-C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29(9):707–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lochhead J, Casson RJ, Salmon JF (2003) Long term effect on intraocular pressure of phacotrabeculectomy compared to trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 87(7):850–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Murthy SK, Damji KF, Pan Y, Hodge WG (2006) Trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy, with mitomycin-C, show similar two-year target IOP outcomes. Can J Ophthalmol 41(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang M, Fang M, Bai YJ, Zhang WZ, Lin MK, Liu BQ et al (2012) Comparison of combined phacotrabeculectomy with trabeculectomy only in the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 125(8):1429–1433

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kleinmann G, Katz H, Pollack A, Schechtman E, Rachmiel R, Zalish M (2002) Comparison of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C with or without phacoemulsification and lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 33(2):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu CB, Chong NH, Caesar RH, Boodhoo MG, Condon RW (1996) Long-term results of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery versus trabeculectomy alone in low-risk patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 22(3):352–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ralli M, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J (2006) Outcomes of laser suture lysis after initial trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 15(1):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen NX, Kuchle M, Martus P, Naumann GO (1999) Quantification of blood–aqueous barrier breakdown after trabeculectomy: pseudoexfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 8(1):18–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Konstas AG, Jay JL, Marshall GE, Lee WR (1993) Prevalence, diagnostic features, and response to trabeculectomy in exfoliation glaucoma. Ophthalmology 100(5):619–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehrnrooth P, Lehto I, Puska P, Laatikainen L (2002) Long-term outcome of trabeculectomy in terms of intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80(3):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim SH, Cha SC (2017) Long-term outcomes of mitomycin-C trabeculectomy in exfoliative glaucoma versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 26(4):303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Öztürker ZK, Öztürker C, Bayraktar S, Altan C, Yilmaz OF (2014) Does the use of preoperative antiglaucoma medications influence trabeculectomy success? J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 30(7):554–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Issa de Fendi L, Cena de Oliveira T, Bigheti Pereira C, Pereira Bigheti C, Viani GA (2016) Additive effect of risk factors for trabeculectomy failure in glaucoma patients: a risk-group from a cohort study. J Glaucoma 25(10):e879–e883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Broadway D, Grierson I, Hitchings R (1993) Adverse effects of topical antiglaucomatous medications on the conjunctiva. Br J Ophthalmol 77(9):590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of Mr. Sami Alghamdi, Research co-ordinator, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, for assistance with data entry and verification.

Funding

There were no sources of funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rizwan Malik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any sources of support or competing interests relevant to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dibaji, M., Alghulaydhawi, F., Fahad, N. et al. Surgical outcomes of phakic, pseudophakic and combined phaco-trabeculectomy in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia. Int Ophthalmol 42, 2903–2914 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02280-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02280-y

Keywords

Navigation