Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fixation stability improvement after occlusion treatment for severe amblyopia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To investigate the improvement of fixation stability of severe amblyopia with traditional patching treatment by the MP-1 microperimeter.

Methods

Eighteen patients with severe unilateral amblyopia were enrolled and received prescribed 6 h per day of patching of the fellow eye with optical correction if needed. Fixation test was performed on eighteen severe unilateral amblyopia patients by the MP-1 microperimeter in baseline, 3-month and 6-month after treatment. The bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA, deg2) was used to quantify fixation stability.

Results

The RMANOVA showed that significant differences were found in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between amblyopia eyes/fellow eyes (AE/FE) group (F = 113.52, p < 0.001) and among follow-up time (F = 74.684, p < 0.001). Moreover, a significant interaction could be found between AE/FE group and follow-up time (baseline/3-month/6-month, F = 60.189, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis by Bonferroni showed significant improvement of BCVA in AE at 3-month (p < 0.001) and 6-month (p < 0.001), compared to baseline, and also significant between 3-month and 6-month (p = 0.002). The RMANOVA showed that significant differences were found in BCEA between AE/FE group (F = 8.432, p = 0.006) and among follow-up time (F = 10.431, p = 0.003). Moreover, a significant interaction could be found between AE/FE group and follow-up time (F = 9.099, p = 0.005). The mean BCEA of AE changed from 13.14 ± 17.97 deg2 at baseline to 6.03 ± 7.27 deg2 at 3-month (p = 0.084) and 3.38 ± 6.40 deg2 at 6-month (p = 0.018). No significant difference of BCEA in fellow eyes was found during the follow-up period (between baseline and 3-month: p = 0.230; between baseline and 6-month: p = 0.692. 0.89 ± 1.02, 0.58 ± 0.40, and 0.03 ± 0.04 deg2 for baseline, 3-month and 6-month, respectively). No significant correlation could be found between BCEA and BCVA of AE, both in enrollment and follow-up (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The fixation stability in the amblyopic eyes is significantly worse than that of the fellow eyes in patients with unilateral severe amblyopia. The fixation stability became better after 6-month occlusion treatment, but the change of fixation stability was not correlated with visual acuity improvement. These quantitative results highlight the importance of fixation in the mechanism of amblyopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BCEA:

Bivariate contour ellipse area

BCVA:

Best-corrected visual acuity

AE:

Amblyopia eye

FE:

Fellow eye

VA:

Visual acuity

References

  1. Johnson DA (2006) The use of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in the evaluation of amblyopia (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 104:414–436

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickmann A, Petroni S, Perrotta V et al (2011) A morpho-functional study of amblyopic eyes with the use of optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. J AAPOS Off Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 15(4):338–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.03.019[published

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Nubile M et al (2007) Fixation patterns evaluation by means of MP-1 microperimeter in microstrabismic children treated for unilateral amblyopia. Eur J Ophthalmol 17(6):885–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subramanian V, Jost RM, Birch EE (2013) A quantitative study of fixation stability in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(3):1998–2003. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-11054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Koylu MT, Ozge G, Kucukevcilioglu M et al (2017) Fixation characteristics of severe amblyopia subtypes: which one is worse? Semi Ophthalmol 32(5):553–58. https://doi.org/10.3109/08820538.2015.1123739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Regan D, Giaschi DE, Kraft SP et al (1992) Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gaze. Ophthalm Physiol Opt J Br College Ophthalm Opt 12(4):425–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace DK, Repka MK, Lee KA et al (2018) American academy of pediatric ophthalmology/strabismus preferred practice pattern pediatric ophthalmology panel. Amblyopia Preferr Pract Pattern Ophthalmol 125(1):105–142

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crossland MD, Dunbar HM, Rubin GS (2009) Fixation stability measurement using the MP1 microperimeter. Retina 29(5):651–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318196bd65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Molina-Martin A, Perez-Cambrodi RJ, Pinero DP (2018) Current clinical application of microperimetry: a review. Semi Ophthalmol 33(5):620–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017.1375125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaikh AG, Otero-Millan J, Kumar P et al (2016) Abnormal fixational eye movements in amblyopia. PloS one 11(3):e0149953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Verghese P, McKee SP, Levi DM (2019) Attention deficits in Amblyopia. Curr Opin Psychol 29:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China [Grant Numbers 81770957; 81500752], Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC12020116), Pudong New Area Municipal Health Bureau (PW2020E-3), the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China [Grant Numbers 201302015].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WS performed the fixation test for the patients and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. ZLL analyzed and interpreted the patient data. TT, ZAQ and LY provided assistance in data analysis and writing of the manuscript. LH and WW made primary contributions to the design of this study and acquisition of patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wen Wen or Hong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Eye & ENT Hospital and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zou, L., Tian, T. et al. Fixation stability improvement after occlusion treatment for severe amblyopia. Int Ophthalmol 42, 1007–1012 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02084-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02084-6

Keywords

Navigation