Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of education seminars on pediatric vision screening in the primary care settings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to assess the practice behaviors of physicians on pediatric vision screening (VS) in primary care settings in Turkey and compare the groups in respect of previous education on VS.

Methods

All physicians working in the primary care settings of Kayseri province of Turkey were directly administered a 24-item questionnaire at planned education seminars. The groups were compared according to a history of VS education (Group 1) and no history of VS education (Group 2). The self-reported questionnaire results were analyzed statistically.

Results

A total of 124 of 453 physicians completed the survey with a response rate of 27.3%. VS was reported to be performed as recommended by 70.2% of the participants. The physicians in Group 1 were significantly older (P < 0.05) and more experienced (P < 0.05) than those in Group 2. Group 1 performed the red reflex (RR) test significantly more frequently (P < 0.05) and referred the patients to an ophthalmologist less frequently than Group 2 (P < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that age (P < 0.05) and previous education (P < 0.05) were the independent factors for visual acuity and RR testing, respectively. Practice-related factors were the most commonly reported barriers to VS in primary care settings.

Conclusion

Although there is a high rate of reported full adherence to the recommendations for pediatric VS, it seems to be more likely to be performed insufficiently. Practice-related barriers should be handled by publicly available education materials (e.g., YouTube videos). VS education should be added at an earlier stage of medical training programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data is available upon request.

References

  1. Holmes JM, Clarke MP (2006) Amblyopia. Lancet 367(9519):1343–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace DK, Repka MX, Lee KA, Melia M, Christiansen SP, Morse CL, Sprunger DT (2018) Amblyopia preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology 125(1):P105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azizoğlu S, Crewther SG, Şerefhan F, Barutchu A, Göker S, Junghans BM (2017) Evidence for the need for vision screening of school children in Turkey. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0618-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Caca I, Cingu AK, Sahin A, Ari S, Dursun ME, Dag U, Balsak S, Alakus F, Yavuz A, Palanci Y (2013) Amblyopia and refractive errors among school-aged children with low socioeconomic status in southeastern Turkey. J AAPOS Offic Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 50(1):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, Astle WF, Dagi LR, Donahue SP, Frazier MG, Hertle RW, Repka MX, Quinn GEJAoo, (2011) Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children. Arch Ophthalmol 129(11):1451–1457. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.179

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Donahue SP, Nixon CN (2016) Visual system assessment in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians. Pediatrics 137(1):28–30. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hered RW, Rothstein M (2003) Preschool vision screening frequency after an office-based training session for primary care staff. Pediatrics 112(1):e17–e21. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.1.e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marsh-Tootle WL, McGwin G, Kohler CL, Kristofco RE, Datla RV, Wall TC (2011) Efficacy of a web-based intervention to improve and sustain knowledge and screening for amblyopia in primary care settings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(10):7160–7167. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6566

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clausen MM, Armitage MD, Arnold RW (2009) Overcoming barriers to pediatric visual acuity screening through education plus provision of materials. J AAPOS Offic Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 13(2):151–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams S, Wajda BN, Alvi R, McCauley C, Martinez-Helfman S, Levin AV (2013) The challenges to ophthalmologic follow-up care in at-risk pediatric populations. J AAPOS Offic Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 17(2):140–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Administration TPH (2020) National Visual screening programme education contents for health professionals narrated by Huban Atilla. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lzm2QS-mRWA

  12. Özkurt ZG, Balsak S, Çamçi MS, Bilgen K, Katran İH, Aslan A, Han ÇÇ (2019) Approach of family physicians to pediatric eye screening in Diyarbakır. Turk J Ophthalmol 49(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemper AR, Clark SJ (2007) Preschool vision screening by family physicians. J Pediatr ophthalmol Strabismus 44(1):24–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le TD, Raashid RA, Colpa L, Noble J, Ali A, Wong A (2018) Paediatric vision screening in the primary care setting in Ontario. Paediatr Child Health 23(3):e33–e39. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxx148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kemper AR, Fant KE, Badgett JT (2003) Preschool vision screening in primary care after a legislative mandate for diagnostic eye examinations. South Med J 96(9):859–862. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Smj.0000054937.26303.95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50(10):1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Kayseri City Hospital, Mevlana mh. Tamer cd. 5/14, Talas, Kayseri, Turkey

    Soner Guven

Authors
  1. Soner Guven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.G designed the study, collected the data, drafted the manuscript, and created the tables.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soner Guven.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Ethics approval

Kayseri Erciyes University, Clinical Investigations Ethics Committee, 20.01.2020/35.

Consent to participate

Consent forms were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Consent forms were obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guven, S. The effect of education seminars on pediatric vision screening in the primary care settings. Int Ophthalmol 42, 635–644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02037-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02037-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation