Abstract
Purpose
To compare the effects of selective α-1 adrenoceptor antagonists on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and pupil diameter size (PDS).
Methods
This prospective study included 87 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia who were treated with tamsulosin hydrochloride (n = 41) or silodosin (n = 46). SFCT measurements were obtained using spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and PDS measurements were obtained under mesopic, photopic and scotopic conditions using a photography-based topography system. SFCT and PDS were evaluated at baseline and 3-, 6- and 12-mo follow-ups.
Results
The initial mean SFCT was 270.53 ± 21.48 µm in tamsulosin group and 271.95 ± 24. 73 in silodosin group (P = 0.078). There was no statistically significant change in SFCT at the 3-mo visit. At the 6-mo follow-up, the mean SFCT was 281.34 ± 22.09 µm in tamsulosin group and 272.5 ± 22.4 µm in silodosin group. At the 12th month, the mean SFCT in tamsulosin group was 290.80 ± 17.27 µm, and it was 270.80 ± 13.14 µm in silodosin group. There was statistically significant difference in at 6th and 12-mo visits (P = 0.014 and P = 0.00). During the follow-up, both drugs induced a similar significant decrease in PDS under all conditions.
Conclusions
Tamsulosin hydrochloride caused a significant increase in SFCT. In contrast, SFCT did not increase in silodosin group. The decreases in PDS achieved using both drugs were similar. This should be kept in mind when choroidal disease and its response to treatment are followed by CT imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E, Jordan A, Dykes TA, Neal DE Jr et al (2019) Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol 8(5):529–539. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.10.01 (PubMed PMID: 31807429)
Alcaraz A, Carballido-Rodríguez J, Unda-Urzaiz M, Medina-López R, Ruiz-Cerdá JL, Rodríguez-Rubio F et al (2016) Quality of life in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH: change over time in real-life practice according to treatment—the QUALIPROST study. Int Urol Nephrol 48(5):645–656
Erkoç M, Beşiroğlu H (2020) Comparison of bipolar TURP and monopolar TURP patients who underwent surgery due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Arc Med Res 36(1):8–11
Yonguc T, Sen V, Bozkurt HI, Aydin ME, Polat S, Yarimoglu S (2019) Impact of chronic constipation on lower urinary tract symptoms and uroflowmetry parameters in men. J Urolo Surg 6(4):308–313. https://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2019.2612(PubMedPMID:WOS:000501997300007)
Aydogan TB, Kaya E, Gazel E, Yalcin S, Aybal HC, Tunc L (2019) Impact of metabolic syndrome on pre- and postoperative parameters in patients undergoing a HoLEP surgery. Turkish J Urol 45:98–103. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.88027 (PubMedPMID:WOS:000502637300017)
Gürbüz C, Drake MJ (2019) Where can urodynamic testing help assess male lower urinary tract symptoms? Turkish J Urol 45(3):157
Verim L, Yıldırım A, Peltekoğlu E, Başok EK, Keskin SK, Çanakcı C (2015) Evaluation of the lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction with uroflowmetry, IPSS and IIEF questioniares. J Urol Surg 2(2):75–80
Yap TL, Brown C, Cromwell DA, Van Der Meulen J, Emberton M (2009) The impact of self-management of lower urinary tract symptoms on frequency-volume chart measures. BJU Int 104(8):1104–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08497.x
Bishr M, Boehm K, Trudeau V, Tian Z, Dell’Oglio P, Schiffmann J et al (2016) Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 10(1–2):55–59. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3058 (PubMed PMID: 26977208)
Michel MC (2010) The Forefront for novel therapeutic agents based on the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction: α-blockers in the treatment of male voiding dysfunction—How do they work and why do they differ in tolerability? J Pharmacol Sci 112(2):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.09R15FM
Oelke M, Gericke A, Michel MC (2014) Cardiovascular and ocular safety of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Expert Opin Drug Saf 13(9):1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2014.936376
Suzuki F, Taniguchi T, Nakamura S, Akagi Y, Kubota C, Satoh M et al (2002) Distribution of alpha-1 adrenoceptor subtypes in RNA and protein in rabbit eyes. Br J Pharmacol 135(3):600–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704503 (PubMed PMID: 11834607)
Lunacek A, Mohamad Al-Ali B, Radmayr C, Weber M, Horninger W, Findl O et al (2018) Ten years of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome in the era of α-blockers. Cent European J Urol 71(1):98–104. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.1234 (PubMed PMID: 29732214)
Sezer T, Altınışık M, Koytak İA, Özdemir MH (2016) The choroid and optical coherence tomography. Turk J Ophthalmol. 46(1):30–7. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.10693 (PubMed PMID: 27800255)
Shibata K, Foglar R, Horie K, Obika K, Sakamoto A, Ogawa S et al (1995) KMD-3213, a novel, potent, alpha 1a-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist: characterization using recombinant human alpha 1-adrenoceptors and native tissues. Mol Pharmacol 48(2):250–258
Chang DF, Campbell JR (2005) Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with tamsulosin. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(4):664–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.02.027
Chatterjee S, Agrawal D (2017) Silodosin-associated intraoperative floppy iris syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol 65(6):538–539. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_704_16
Ipekci T, Akin Y, Hoscan B, Tunckiran A (2015) Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with silodosin. Acta Ophthalmologica 93(4):e306-e. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12549
Goseki T, Ishikawa H, Ogasawara S, Mashimo K, Nemoto N, Taguchi Y et al (2012) Effects of tamsulosin and silodosin on isolated albino and pigmented rabbit iris dilators: possible mechanism of intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(9):1643–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.025
Patil PN (2004) Parameters of drug antagonism: re-examination of two modes of functional competitive drug antagonism on intraocular muscles. J Pharm Pharmacol 56(8):1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357043978
Dogan M, Kutluksaman B, Keles I, Karalar M, Halat AO (2017) The effects of systemic alfuzosin and tamsulosin hydrochloride on choroidal thickness and pupil diameter sizes in cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Eye Res 42(12):1638–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2017.1359306
Sari E, Sogutlu Sari E, Yazici A, Koç A, Bulbul E, Koytak A et al (2015) The effect of systemic tamsulosin hydrochloride on choroidal thickness measured by enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 40(10):1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2014.971935
Nickla DL, Wallman J (2010) The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res 29(2):144–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.12.002 (PubMed PMID: 20044062; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2913695)
Ölçücü MT, Teke K, Yildirim K, Toğaç M, Işık B, Yilmaz YC (2020) Comparision effects of solifenacin, darifenacin, propiverine on ocular parameters in eyes: a prospective study. Int Braz J Urol 46(2):185–193
Reiner A, Zagvazdin Y, Fitzgerald MEC (2003) Choroidal blood flow in pigeons compensates for decreases in arterial blood pressure. Exp Eye Res 76(3):273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4835(02)00316-0
Bouteleux V, Kodjikian L, Mendes M, Agard E, Machkour-Bentaleb Z, El-Chehab H et al (2019) Increased choroidal thickness: a new feature to monitor age-related macular degeneration recurrence. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257(4):699–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-04216-8
Chen Y, Palczewska G, Mustafi D, Golczak M, Dong Z, Sawada O et al (2013) Systems pharmacology identifies drug targets for Stargardt disease-associated retinal degeneration. J Clin Inves 123(12):5119–34. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci69076 (PubMed PMID: 24231350)
Orban T, Leinonen H, Getter T, Dong Z, Sun W, Gao S et al (2018) A combination of G protein-coupled receptor modulators protects photoreceptors from degeneration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 364(2):207–20. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.245167 (PubMed PMID: 29162627)
Funding
There were no financial disclosure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Hatice Selen Kanar declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mahmut Taha Olcucu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ibrahim Ozdemir declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Local Ethical Committee approval number is: B.30.2ATA.0.01.00.
Human and animal rights
Research involving human participants.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanar, H.S., Olcucu, M.T. & Ozdemir, I. Comparison of effects of tamsulosin and silodosin on subfoveal choroidal thickness and pupil size diameters in patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Int Ophthalmol 41, 3921–3927 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01961-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01961-4